No surprises. Twitter bar analysts are claiming this is a possible signal that China "condemns" the Russian invasion.Anyone surprised by this?![]()
No surprises. Twitter bar analysts are claiming this is a possible signal that China "condemns" the Russian invasion.Anyone surprised by this?![]()
I'm getting the feeling it is just the begining.I am baffled by Russia's decision to go balls deep in Ukraine. Is it satisfying to do it? Heck yes. But as @MarKoz81 has noted in his excellent analysis, the best case scenario for Russia is to become a nuclear equipped henchman of the PRC. Is it really worth it for Putin to go all in and jeopardize Russia's hope for greatness?
They sure are welcome in Poland. You know, cause we have such a great history of co-habitating, and nothing ever going wrong. No, sir.The european readiness to welcome Ukrainian refugees is far greater then to accept those from the middle east. The most anti-refugee states of eastern europe especially, since there already is a sizeable Ukrainian community and they are culturally close to each other.
Like it or not, Europeans tend to be more welcoming to white skinned christians then to other ethnicites. So the refugee tactic will at most work with severly dimished return.
No surprises. Twitter bar analysts are claiming this is a possible signal that China "condemns" the Russian invasion.
It is so obvious that China does not need to align itself with the position of condemning the invasion of Ukraine in the UN Security Council vote when Russia has the power of veto. Everyone surprised by China's abstention.They are a very delusional bunch.
With anti-armour weapons provided by the West, Kiev is a deathtrap for armour entering it blindRussia sending in SOF instead of Armor? Trying to minimize collateral damage?
Do not use childish principles on the international stage. There is no right or wrong because there is no judge. These are the highest powers in the world doing all they can to vie for an outcome. The West is underhanded; Russia can be more underhanded to beat them. America justifies killing innocent children because the Taliban "made" them do it as if not surrendering is the crime that led the US to commit those attrocities. Same thing applies to Russia; everything they had to do, they did because NATO forced them; it's all NATO's fault. If two wrongs don't make a right, then what's right? Complain about a wrong committed upon you while taking abuse and refuse to defend yourself with similar actions? Two wrongs don't make a right because there is no wrong or right; this is a fight. If your opponent hits, hit harder. If he's vicious, be more vicious. If he's underhanded, be more underhanded. There are no rules. Anything he does, you do better. Win at all costs for your nation and your people. And when it's over, you dictate what was right or wrong in the history books that you write as the winner. That's all there is to it. I support Russia no matter what they have to do and any attrocities committed are the fault of NATO for pushing Russia.
Russian armor are about 50 km from Kiev to the north and west.Russia sending in SOF instead of Armor? Trying to minimize collateral damage?