Then why is China neutral at UNSC? Can you explain why morals and principles does not matter, but China's actions at UNSC suggests opposite - China is neutral at UNSC and does not openly support Russia's brazen actions. If US imperialism is an existential threat to China, then why doesn't China openly support Russia's brazen actions to fight against US? Oh yea, because "non-interference in internal affairs" principle still matters. This is my point.
This is so very simple; I cannot believe I need to tell you. Principles matter at the surface; you must keep up appearances. When I wrote that to you, I wrote it in candor; you cannot speak to the masses like that. You cannot say, "There is no right or wrong. The same thing is right when we do it, wrong when they do it." You cannot appear a hippocrit in public. China cannot openly support what Russia is doing because it looks like China supports one country invading another. But at the highest level, morals don't matter, only results and benefits, and it benefits China for Russia to depress NATO, so Chinese actions must support it. China can and should give Russia support whereever it needs in action; to defeat sanctions, to get critical materials. Russia needs no lip service at UNSC, and to remain neutral when seeing one side attack another is pretty much being on the side of the attacker because objectively, one would condemn such an action. This is the same as the Anglo game of saying one thing, doing another. Saying they don't support Tibetan or Taiwanese independence, but in action, they do, saying they support China's peaceful rise while trying to stop China from making so much as a computer chip. Please don't take things at face value and think with the depth of a child; this is international politics. Everyone is fork-tongued.