Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Because Russia is declining, while China is rising. China does not need to rush military action.
The US might just decide to lick its wounds for like a decade. They will be much more annoying afterwards than they are now.
China needs to make alternative to petrodollar system.

the western Ukrainians, such as the Lviv Ukrainians, are rabidly anti Russia, and they are tough fighters. they won't give up. expect hard battles ahead.
the strategy for the West is simple: turn Ukraine into a quagmire for Russia, they did it once in Afghanistan.
The US did jack shit. The Afghans did the Soviets in. It isn't called the graveyard of empires for nothing. Do you think it was the Stingers? That is US mythology. The Soviets adapted to that in two months by developing new flares for the helicopters and flying bombers at altitude. Did they need Stingers to kick the US and NATO out?

Is this video legit?
No.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Then why is China neutral at UNSC? Can you explain why morals and principles does not matter, but China's actions at UNSC suggests opposite - China is neutral at UNSC and does not openly support Russia's brazen actions. If US imperialism is an existential threat to China, then why doesn't China openly support Russia's brazen actions to fight against US? Oh yea, because "non-interference in internal affairs" principle still matters. This is my point.
This is so very simple; I cannot believe I need to tell you. Principles matter at the surface; you must keep up appearances. When I wrote that to you, I wrote it in candor; you cannot speak to the masses like that. You cannot say, "There is no right or wrong. The same thing is right when we do it, wrong when they do it." You cannot appear a hippocrit in public. China cannot openly support what Russia is doing because it looks like China supports one country invading another. But at the highest level, morals don't matter, only results and benefits, and it benefits China for Russia to depress NATO, so Chinese actions must support it. China can and should give Russia support whereever it needs in action; to defeat sanctions, to get critical materials. Russia needs no lip service at UNSC, and to remain neutral when seeing one side attack another is pretty much being on the side of the attacker because objectively, one would condemn such an action. This is the same as the Anglo game of saying one thing, doing another. Saying they don't support Tibetan or Taiwanese independence, but in action, they do, saying they support China's peaceful rise while trying to stop China from making so much as a computer chip. Please don't take things at face value and think with the depth of a child; this is international politics. Everyone is fork-tongued.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top