Strange that they need tanks when they say they didn't loss many... still more tank is better if you have the fuel to make them run !
Ukrainian War Developments
- Thread starter james smith esq
- Start date
- Status
i mean South Korea trust Russia infrastructure (No one stealing them) and financial system to store products this in addition to R&D.
prices are not much different than international level.
It is non-sense that current Economic structure is shaped by EU. In just one Month Turkey is practically largest trading partner of Russia in that part of world.
operating 72 cargo flights related to S-400 delivery shows that they have surplus cargo capacity and willing to use it. Syria alone is 1000X of it every year. than add whole Africa. you are underestimating the amount of high quality manpower required to keep aviation products at high tempo operation. reliability and supply chain to make product that is remotely usable in 21st century need huge experience and time. 16 ton engine become 20 ton to make sure plane can keep flying on one engine.
do you count every part and design that Russia supplied to Boeing , Airbus and various engine manufacturers.
they are gong to increase production capacity certainly not for global export level but end product is very competitive. there is no competitive analysis done in de-globalization era for aviation products.
Ukraine was primarily in helicopter and marine engines. so that took a decade or two to replace them. As mentioned Russia industrial policy is for different world than the world we have lived until now.
this company is from small town by global standards. so i am not sure why you think they are not investing to build products that take advantage of 5G connectivity.
Russia does not need European money it has plenty of money of its own and from Middleast. what it need from Europe is the competent and skilled people that have left Russian world since 1917 to move back to take jobs and built products outside EU system.
they started working on it with money since 2007. this fundamental conflict between Germanic world and Russian world. the rest are just side actors.
USSR does not have strength when you look at quality of leadership they were producing and putting way more investments in Ukraine relative to other places. it is that unbalanced investment that more population of USSR end up near Ukraine rather than in Far East.
so you think only fighters and drone that fly at medium altitude are future proof?. there is no gun/rocket/ATGM developed yet that can reliablity take mobile targets from such altitude especially in simultaneous multi-shot engagement. infact with introduction of hypersonic missiles with Mach 10+ speeds, high performance radars and radar satellites. there is less difference between hitting bases far away from battlefield than near to battlefield. cheap widely disperse airbases with high tempo rate much effective than stealth fighters parked thousands kms away that need much more support infrastructure.
Looks like Polish Krab SPG's and M113
Naturally. only your kind of exceptional intelligence can divine the great merits of giving argentinians land weapons suitable for fighting the Russians on land, and antiship missiles with a range of 75 nms, ito threaten a British held island 300 nms out to sea.
more like M577 Command Post Carrier and M109A6 Paladin
Uniformed Ukrainian soldiers will likely be treated with dignity per Geneva Convention, if for nothing else, then for pragmatic reasons.
Russia can't wash it's hands of the aftermath of Ukraine. It has to somehow deal with Ukrainians and the easiest and most moral way is to keep it as clean as possible.
Ukraine and Belarus got these advantages because they suffered the most during WWII. Plans for Belarus Traktors plants were set before Belarus liberated of Nazis. Belarus is the little gem of Soviet social engineering, a 9 million country that produces almost everything and has a very good level of living comforts despite being sanctioned hard for years
- Status