Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
Well they will still need stuff...for example : no gaz no car in Germany. China will build a sh**load of LNG ship, the US will sell his fuel and fracking gaz to Europe. We have new oil industries projects here in Canada for this booming prospect, government is salivating. The price of grains will go sky high too. Who will feed Europe next winter ? Europe will be milked until they look like dry grapes.

So they will pay for Russian gaz...or darkages for 10 years.
So your saying i should buy a bigger fridge and stock up for 3 months o_O

Highly Implausible in the first place. Secondly, if he had been captured, they would have already been sharing the video and/or photos of him in captivity.

I wonder who it is that goes around even starting this type of rumour.
Its something that can be easily dispelled by the west just do a short live stream with the suppose high level people.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
Here are interesting articles by Justin Bronk, a British analyst of airpower.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Getting Serious About SEAD: European Air Forces Must Learn from the Failure of the Russian Air Force over Ukraine"

"The failure of the Russian air force to gain and exploit air superiority over Ukraine has been a surprise for most air power professionals.
However, far from inspiring complacency, Russian failure should make Western air forces reflect honestly on how they would fare under
similar circumstances."

"The immediate lesson is that Russia’s failure and Ukraine’s inability to conduct successful suppression and/or destruction of enemy
air defences (SEAD/DEAD) operations has crippled the battlefield effectiveness of both air forces."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Is the Russian Air Force Actually Incapable of Complex Air Operations?"

"One of the greatest surprises from the initial phase of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has been the inability of the Russian
Aerospace Forces (VKS) fighter and fighter-bomber fleets to establish air superiority, or to deploy significant combat power
in support of the under-performing Russian ground forces."

"Unlikely or Insufficient Potential Explanations

One potential argument is that the VKS fighter fleets are being held in reserve, potentially as a deterrent against direct intervention
by NATO forces. This is unlikely to be the case. If the VKS is capable of large-scale combat operations to rapidly establish air superiority
over Ukraine, by not doing so, it is, in fact, weakening its potential deterrent value against NATO forces rather than preserving it.
The failure of the much-feared Russian Army to rapidly overwhelm the much smaller and poorly positioned Ukrainian forces, and
its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and personnel, have already seriously damaged international perceptions of Russia’s conventional
military power. From a NATO deterrence standpoint, the Russian General Staff and the Kremlin have every incentive to employ their
airpower to maximum effect to re-establish some of this lost credibility.

Another argument has been that due to the relatively low proportion of the VKS fixed-wing fleet that can effectively employ
precision-guided munitions, large-scale strikes with unguided bombs and rockets were being avoided due to a desire to avoid
damaging critical infrastructure which Russia hopes to conquer and use, or from a desire to minimise Ukrainian civilian casualties.
This was a potentially valid assumption in the initial days of the invasion, when the Russian leadership was planning on a quick
military victory. However, as this possibility has rapidly faded and Russian forces have settled into a pattern of heavy artillery and
cruise missile bombardments against multiple encircled cities – most notably
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– this theory no longer
explains the lack of large-scale VKS strikes.

Another theory is that Russian commanders are less willing to risk suffering heavy losses to their expensive and prestigious fast jets,
and so have held back the VKS due to low risk tolerance. This also does not make sense. Russian ground forces have lost hundreds
of modern tanks, armoured personnel carriers, short- and medium-range air-defence systems and thousands of troops including a
disproportionate number of elite paratroopers (VDV) and special forces in a week. The Russian economy is being rapidly choked by
crippling sanctions, and the Russian leadership has burned its carefully developed influence networks and alliances throughout Europe
and the wider world. In short, the Kremlin is risking everything – holding back the air force to avoid losses does not make sense in this
context.

The Only Currently Viable Explanation

While the early VKS failure to establish air superiority could be explained by lack of early warning, coordination capacity and
sufficient planning time, the continued pattern of activity suggests a more significant conclusion: that the VKS lacks the
institutional capacity to plan, brief and fly complex air operations at scale. There is significant circumstantial evidence to
support this, admittedly tentative, explanation."

"Russia has every incentive to establish air superiority, and on paper should be more than capable of doing so if it commits to
combat operations in large, mixed formations to suppress and hunt down Ukrainian fighters and SAM systems. Instead,
the VKS continues to only operate in very small numbers and at low level to minimise the threat from the Ukrainian SAMs."
Probably one of the better western assessments. I mean it's still bad but at least he tried to break down the possibilities in a logical manner. I disagree with it's conclusion obviously.

My opinion. We don't know the state of Ukraine's air defences, we can say that pre-war it could have been better. It consisted of older ex-Soviet platforms like S-300Vs, Strelka-1s, Buks and so on. Russia has been targeting them heavily but we can't say how much they've been weakened. Despite that they've managed to score some kills and it's clear that they pose some threat and must be respected. Ukraine's air force is a similar story. It's ex Soviet, has taken losses, but Russia can't discount the possibility of some sorties.

Thanks to NATO AWACS giving 24/7 coverage it will be known exactly where Russian aircraft have taken off and which direction they are going. They can feed this to local SAM operators whenever they have a chance to engage. There's no need for them to turn their radars on except for then.

As to where the RuAF is. First, it needs to be acknowledged that at this point of the war operations have ground to a halt everywhere but in a few locations for the past few weeks. Even when towns are captured or lost, most engagements have been small scale from both sides with defenders preferring to withdraw than to reinforce and fight.

If Russia started supporting the small scale operations it is currently undertaking, it would be playing EXACTLY to Ukraine's strengths. Small numbers of Tu-22s, Su-25s and pretty much everything else is very vunerable to mobile SAMs. Ideally you'd use ground attack drones in this situation because they scale down well and it isn't important if they are lost or not, but Russia lacks these in significant numbers. Russia's alternative seems to be a combination of low flying Su-25s, attack helicopters and Orlan UAVs guiding ground artillery and that's what we're seeing. The first two are vunerable to the new western manpads Ukraine has received, but losses don't seem to be too bad.

Once Mariupol has been mopped up and forces have been redeployed I expect a big change. At this point, Russia can go back to traditional overwhelming force both on the ground and in the air. What air defence Ukraine has left will be able to much against heavy aerial Russian attack, it will simply be overwhelmed with targets. When engages one it'll give it's position away and be vunerable to counter attack. It's simple strength through numbers.

Short range SAMs could quickly be overrun by ground forces if they're close to front lines. Long distance S-300s could still pose a threat but they don't have many left. I think that's why we've been seeing things like Iskander missiles taking out single batteries.

So to put it simply, the RuAF is waiting for "strength through numbers", and that will only happen when the ground forces are ready.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
Its obvious that drones of all sizes need to be both used and protected against in modern conflicts.
Not wanting to veer to far off topic, but for the small drones, what are the best counter measures?
I can think of directed energy weapons (sounds very sci fi, but I am thinking electronic pulse to burn out delicate electrics or small lasers to do the same)
Otherwise very small kamikaze defender drones.

For short-range, lightweight drones (think DJI-type), a laser CIWS or a gun-based solution with a high rate of fire (think CS/SA5 or LD-2000) in combination with microwave- or EM-based countermeasures would be the safest option.

For HALE/MALE drones, something akin to the FK-1000, FK-2000, Sky Dragon 12, or FB-10 would likely be the most cost-effective option, with the HQ-17 or similar systems reserved for faster targets.
 

Stealthflanker

Senior Member
Registered Member
They (the Russians) don't have counter-battery radars or Orlans/Orions to scout Ukrainian hardware?

They do and 1 was captured. The thing is that you only know there is artillery battery firing at you when they actually fire.

The vid is of course not showing whether there is Russian counterbattery or airstrike after that.
 

enroger

Junior Member
Registered Member
The thing about thousands drones are, they gonna need thousands of Ground control systems too, current tech are not really "smart enough" yet for a fully autonomous drones. they also need large bandwidth communications to support them.

Don't necessarily need to send them all at once, think of drones as consumable, you just circulate drones throughout the battlefield nonstop and expect them to be shot down by the dozens. Overall the fallen drones will earn you many times their own values
 

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
Natural gas energizing the ruble...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ruble stronger than before Ukraine crisis​

The Russian currency is trading at a six-week high

The Russian ruble strengthened to 76 rubles to the US dollar and 82 against the euro on Thursday, reaching its strongest levels against major currencies since February 23.

The ruble plunged to historic lows after Russia launched the special military operation in Ukraine, and the US and its allies imposed unprecedented sanctions targeting the country’s financial system. On March 7, the Russian currency fell to as low as 150 rubles to the dollar.

The ruble nosedived on February 24, immediately after the start of the military operation, as international penalties targeted its freely traded currency. Western countries froze Moscow’s foreign reserves, making it difficult for the Bank of Russia to support the ruble by selling foreign currencies.

The Russian government took steps to stabilize the sanctions-hit economy, helping the currency to bounce back from record low levels. The central bank introduced immediate capital controls, including a ban on foreigners selling Russian assets, as well as mandated hard currency sales by exporters.

The Russian currency received another boost after President Vladimir Putin announced in March that “unfriendly countries” that imposed sanctions against Moscow must now pay for Russian natural gas in rubles only. The demand received a negative response from the EU; however, Hungary and Slovakia said they were ready to accept the new way of payment. Moscow has also indicated that in the future, all Russian commodities will have to be paid for in rubles.

Another factor in favor of the ruble was the announcement by the Bank of Russia on March 25 that the regulator is resuming gold
purchases at a fixed price of 5,000 rubles ($52 at the time) per 1 gram between March 28 and June 30. The move effectively links the ruble to gold, and since gold trades in US dollars, this sets a floor price for the ruble in terms of the dollar, establishing a new exchange rate between the two currencies closer to the levels seen on Thursday.

FPuY6iBakAAva5-.jpg
 
Last edited:

Stealthflanker

Senior Member
Registered Member
Don't necessarily need to send them all at once, think of drones as consumable, you just circulate drones throughout the battlefield nonstop and expect them to be shot down by the dozens. Overall the fallen drones will earn you many times their own values

As consumables as they are, they still needs infrastructure. Especially if you want them to actually return. Otherwise the better term would be Loitering munitions or cruise missile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top