i liked this analysis on the Chinese ambassador’s interview on CBS. We have seen the video before but I liked Cyrus breakdown.
They have been training nazis, they have been arming nazis, they KNOW they are nazis and not a single time has NATO pressured the Ukrainians to drop their nazi bullshit as a prerequisite to get support.
And for the past two months, they have even been running cover for them and their atrocities.
And they have been doing this shit since they helped coup Ukraine in 2014.
So, tell me how NATO isnt at least partially responsible for this?
The video of the interview is cut and edited so bad that anything said is fluke, lol !
i liked this analysis on the Chinese ambassador’s interview on CBS. We have seen the video before but I liked Cyrus breakdown.
i agree every system has its own utility and effectiveness. it is just that attack drones have been used for less. so why would they add more drones with similar characteristics?It isn't an either or option. You can use attack helicopters, ground support aircraft and drones.
helicopter is part of combined system of assaults and attack choppers and engine reliability/ maintenance are known to a higher degree of confidence.Compared to the number of personnel required to maintain helicopters or aircraft sorties?
this also need increasing drone operators, increasing small weopons. as drones are only used from long runways in well developed fields. it limit where and when it can show up when dealing with such large geographic area like Ukraine.They do carry less ordinance, but you can mitigate that by increasing the number of drones you deploy. You can also have those drones split up and covering a larger area, something you can't do with a single plane.
unlike drones. Ka-52/Su-25 have option of low altitude flight with protection. it is time and effectiveness important to clear area for ground troops as fast as possible. Pilot alone is not only person that is important.Self protection from what? Ukraine's defences have already been largely suppressed. Even if one is shot down, it's better that missile hit a drone than a su-25.
PGB need to be carried by air force. using CM/BM decrease the need of sorties. Russia maximum known sortie rate of aircraft is 300 per day.If you bought them before the war started you would have been fine. Now it will be a political issue.
It's much more expensive to use large ballistic & cruise missiles than PGB.
i never said drones are only solution it is just they are way underutilized in strike form. Russia has alteast two or three manufacturing plants that make attack drones.Again, drones aren't the solution to all problems. But you are refusing to acknowledge the unique advantages drones have.
or they have learned from long middleast conflicts what works and what not works . remember ground troops need to be rotated for rest. they cannot wait months for airpower to soften the targets and still have to deal with insurgency. currrent low altitude flight mode is to decrease the burden on ground troops by doing classic CAS.To me it seems Russia isn't able to deploy enough Orions for it to make a difference so they're not bothering. Or they're just stubborn and refuse to integrate a new platform.
Here's the video. Looks to be true, and if so, really despicable stuff -
View attachment 85978
sanctions against Russia, introduced (in yellow) and who ignored (in gray) :
View attachment 86008
Yeah, it seems this is the only way to stop the Ukrainians from painting 'Z' on all their losses.That's quite a large munition used for such a vehicle. At least the crew went straight to Valhalla without a hitch.
As I recall, Ukraine earlier threatened to execute all captured Russian artillery crew members because it blamed themGood to see Zelensky addressing reports that Russian POW have mistreated. It's just words of course, and it would need to be followed by action. But better than ignoring it and letting it get out of hand.
Despite what the media is saying, death rates on both sides have been relatively low given how many soldiers are currently in action. Civilian casualties also are likely to be less military deaths.
It doesn't take much for a war to descend into a total bloodbath.
He's still not doing anything about the fact that Ukrainian civilians are being publicly tortured by nazi militia in regions he controls, but until Ukraine is liberated that's his problem.
I liked the analysis but Cyrus, never said his editing was good. the real interview was ruined by the constant interruptions, but we get the idea.The video of the interview is cut and edited so bad that anything said is fluke, lol !