Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

NeoIsolationist

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Columns of armored vehicles sighted in DPR territory

Moscow. February 22. INTERFAX.RU - A large number of armored vehicles were seen on the territory of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR).

As eyewitnesses told Interfax, two columns of armored vehicles are in DPR territory and heading towards the north and west of the republic.

The day before, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree recognizing the independence of the People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk and instructed the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to carry out peacekeeping functions in the DPR and LPR.
I think recognition is just step one. The Russian Army still surrounds Ukraine on three sides. Next step in the playbook should be a false flag against Donbass, with massive actual casualties to the ethnic Russian population. Russia would then use that as an engineered Casus Belli against Ukraine and start an invasion.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
China doesn't support "recogniziation of independence separatist states" because what if separatists in Xinjiang/Taiwan/Tibet declare independence, I bet you will say you oppose that. But with separatists in Ukraine, it's fine because "US BAD" , that isn't any different from US supporting Xinjiang independence because "CHINA BAD". What's up with the double standards.
That is what you think what China's principle is, I am afraid.

Examples include but not limited to: China recognized Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan, recently China recognized South Sudan's breakaway from Sudan.

China's decision is NOT based on some paper or referendum but on the fact on the ground as proof of separation being acceptable.
A bloody conflict can be a proof, such as Sudan. An absolute ethnic majority can be another one such as Crimea and Donbas. Failure of the government in keeping the country together can be also one, such as breakup of Yugoslavia.

But China can refuse and has refused to recognize breakaways such as Kosovo because Serbia is our friend even though Kosovo does fulfil some said conditions (war and ethnic).

One can only be "double standard" if one breaks ones stated principle. But China has never made such statement as you suggested.
 

PhSt

Junior Member
Registered Member
China doesn't support "recogniziation of independence separatist states" because what if separatists in Xinjiang/Taiwan/Tibet declare independence, I bet you will say you oppose that. But with separatists in Ukraine, it's fine because "US BAD" , that isn't any different from US supporting Xinjiang independence because "CHINA BAD". What's up with the double standards.

China doesn't need to openly support Russia in liberating Ukraine from the US puppet regime. A Russian victory in Eastern Europe will be beneficial to China. Should I remind you about how the EU and America regularly Spit on China's face in the name of Democracy? Double standards is a norm in world politics since ancient times. You are clearly just using your supposed "opposition" to double standards as an excuse to push your Pro-American narratives. You claim to support China but at the same time also support China's enemies lol.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
So the US should take on both Russia and China at the same time. Great advice.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
That's exactly the kind of foreign policy blob we want in the West. Delusional halfwits who are going to lead the US into total failure. But on the other hand, it's not like they have much choice - what other moves do they have left to play?

Edit: LOL, they're so pathetically transparent
American airpower, admittedly, is stretched across the two theaters, which is an argument for a larger Air Force in the years to come.
Raphael S. Cohen is a senior political scientist and director of the Strategy and Doctrine Program, Project AIR FORCE
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
That is what you think what China's principle is, I am afraid.

Examples include but not limited to: China recognized Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan, recently China recognized South Sudan's breakaway from Sudan.

China's decision is NOT based on some paper or referendum but on the fact on the ground as proof of separation being acceptable.
A bloody conflict can be a proof, such as Sudan. An absolute ethnic majority can be another one such as Crimea and Donbas. Failure of the government in keeping the country together can be also one, such as breakup of Yugoslavia.

But China can refuse and has refused to recognize breakaways such as Kosovo because Serbia is our friend even though Kosovo does fulfil some said conditions (war and ethnic).

One can only be "double standard" if one breaks ones stated principle. But China has never made such statement as you suggested.
Indeed, why is China being held to standards that the white caucasoid west has historically and concurrently failed to live up to?

Ever since the Opium Wars, the white west has proven that Cannons are the Final Argument of Kings, and as for the inevitable whining from the West: Vae Victus
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
I think recognition is just step one. The Russian Army still surrounds Ukraine on three sides. Next step in the playbook should be a false flag against Donbass, with massive actual casualties to the ethnic Russian population. Russia would then use that as an engineered Casus Belli against Ukraine and start an invasion.
I highly doubt a false flag operation will happen or is needed. I believe Ukraine will be the one who may set it off because they HAVE to react. If the Ukrainian leadership just shrugs and let the regions go unofficially or they don't do s**t and just talk, they will have internal strife, which can lead to an ultranationalist uprising. If they fight, they will fight against Russia. This is a lose lose situation for them. The only way Ukraine can win is that China to sanction Russia. The West's sanctions are clearly not enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top