Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
The cold-hard reality is everyone is 'imperialistic' to one degree or another, just a different flavor of power and influence of the day. In no particular order:
  • Realistically, China is an 'imperialistic' power that is prioritizing peacetime growth and soft power influence over violence/excursions/adventurism.
  • American is an 'imperialistic' power that is prioritizing soft power, salami-slicing and blatant shit-stirring over excursions/adventurism.
  • Russia is an 'imperialist' power that is prioritizing raw military might over salami-slicing and soft influence.

Faux outage and condemnation is superficial, it doesn't scratch the surface of the necessary evils underlying realpolitik decision-making. If we get bogged down with condemnation and outrage, it doesn't solve anything. However, it is still important to atleast acknowledge Russian (and US) actions as imperialistic as a matter of fact, but labels and condemnations alone won't solve the geopoltical issues such as anti-China containment by US or limited strategic autonomy for Russia if Ukraine becomes a NATO state.
 
Last edited:

KYli

Brigadier
1. The way the tanks are being employed lends them to getting whacked more often. They are the tip of the spear most of the time. Therefore, they'll get targeted first. First come, first served, erm, shot at. That makes sense.
Stay off the roads. It is as simple as that. Most of tank companies were ambushed and destroyed on the main roads.
While constricting Mauripol hard, it hasn't cracked yet. I seem to recall a poster claiming Mauripol had fallen in a few hours the first night of the war. That post definitely aged well. I expect it will fall and probably by Sunday, but I thought it would have fallen already. Not yet. Not yet.
I don't think there were any better ways to fight urban warfare. If your enemies are determined, you just need to go house by house, apartment by apartment, and block by block. Unless you want to indiscriminately kill everyone with carpet bombing.
The rumors of attacks, thrusts, parries and counteroffensives are about as clear and accurate as a blind man flinging mud and calling it a clear hit. No sign of the kessel I've heard for the last few weeks. Artillery still falls on Donetsk, so any DNR offensives can't have made that much progress. The claims of the counteroffensive by the Ukrainians to Kherson were being followed by CNN and then...crickets? hmm. Hmmm, I say. The Ukrainians have encircled the Russians outside Kiev! um. (x) doubt. The Russians have encircled Kiev! uh, about those Prime Ministers. I'm totally sure the Russians let them pass freely. Oh, sure, go ahead! Feel free to pass through our lines to conspire against us!
Ukrainians want to bait Russians to launch a full assault towards Kyiv. It is the only way for Ukrainians to defeat Putin and win the war. Putin isn't taking the bait. All the propaganda about Russia is running out of ammunition, supplies, foods are just an attempt to pressure Putin. The counter offensive is the same thing. The aim is not to drive out Russian troops but to put pressure on Putin so Putin would tell Russian troops to launch a full assault to Kyiv when it is not ready to do so in both strategically or tactically.

Ukrainians believe they can outlast the Russians. Many NATO and American experts also believe Russian economy would be crippled within a few weeks due to the war and sanctions. I think they are both wrong. Russian economy is more resilience than they think and Putin is more determined to win the war no matter what.
I am becoming dubious the Russians can win either. Oh, they might on the battlefield, but...after that...a full capitulation requires breaking the will to fight. If anything, the resolve, the rage, of Ukrainians has grown. I don't think people here are taking that rage seriously. Ukrainians are a passionate people in their own way. When they love, it is deep. When they hate, it is far, far worse. And they are just as stubborn and obstinate as any Russian. Probably more so, at least in my sample of one (my own) experience.
I actually see it the other way around. After witnessing all major cities got completely destroyed. After so many Ukrainians were forced to flee. When most of those who dare to fight back are either dead or wounded. The will to continue to fight would be broken. Mongols invaded, sacked, siege, destroyed every cities on their ways. By doing that, Mongols also broke the will to those dare to oppose them to continue to fight. Rage and anger are meaningless when you need to feed your families.
If the Russians cannot free up troops from Mauripol after they have taken it, I think Russia is in trouble. If they do not conduct another serious and successful offensive, they are serious trouble. in If the Russians are still fighting this war in July, they are screwed.
That really depends upon how desperate Putin wants to win. After Mariupol, Russians look to attack from both sides of Dniper and a major push to encircling the East front. An amphibious assault on Odessa is still plausible or just an attempt to tie down Ukrainian troops from preventing them to aid Kyiv.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It seems Biden is still unable to rein in the Europeans.
Frankly with Russian cats and trees sanctioned I think the west is out of ammunition on that front.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
which yes, is high, but much lower than the 90% during the 1998 Russian Financial Crisis, and even 90% inflation did not cause the Russian state to collapse. At this rate Russia could maintain current pace of combat for ages.

Sanctions are also causing confidence problems for future US dollar reserves:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
India is feeling dollar reserve is no longer safe and looking to reduce it.
 
Last edited:

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Wow. I ducked out to deal with the rest of life and came back to read. This thread has become...disappointing. Meming, ad hominems, mockery of sources, etc. If I wanted that, I'd hang out on reddit. I think I saw 1, maybe 2 attempts to do analysis. That the signal to noise ratio is so bad tells me not much is really happening.

One of the things I have thoroughly enjoyed here has been the divergence of views and the respectfulness of those. I have been told I have a minority view here before. Yet, no mockery. No derision. I hope I have returned that same courtesy. I hope it would be extended to others as well.

I really want to reemphasize NOT to plainly accept anyone's propaganda. The Ukrainians and Russians would both shame Buratino's nose at this point. And let's not even go near the other players in this war. Perhaps they can end the war with nasal jousting? Be critical. Don't just accept things because they fit your worldview or hopes. Sometimes the truth is bitter and we must accept the world is not as we would wish it to be.

Mild chastisement done. Let's do something of a bit of analysis: be the change you wish to see, I think they say?

Everyone knows our friend Oryx.

(stop groaning!)

As of the time of writing, the Russians have 'lost' 279 tanks, 265 IFVs and 71 APCs. This adds up to 16 and change BTG and tank battalions. Saying that though is a little deceptive. A BTG has, iirc, 3 mech companies and a tank company. A tank battalion is 31 tanks. Really, it is 10 BTG plus 6 tank battalions. That's actually interesting. Please, allow me to attempt to explain.

When the invasion was imminent, it was said there were 130 BTGs positioned. That would mean 1300 tanks and 4030 IFVs+APCs. I don't think I ever heard how many independent tank battalions there were. Does someone know?

Assuming Oryx's numbers are semi accurate, then the Russians have lost 21% of their tanks from the original BTGs. The Russians have only lost about 8% of their IFVs+APCs. Starting to see what I think is interesting?

The question is why? The IFVs and APCs are not more resistant to ATGM. So why the tanks? Let me take a couple guesses:

1. The way the tanks are being employed lends them to getting whacked more often. They are the tip of the spear most of the time. Therefore, they'll get targeted first. First come, first served, erm, shot at. That makes sense.

2. Also...I think the Ukrainians are intentionally targeting the tanks. Tanks in mobile warfare are the most effective weapon against other tanks. IFVs and other lighter AFVs can take out tanks, but BTR videos aside, it's not as easy and far more prone to getting yourself killed. Preserve your own tank force (debatable if that is happening) and let the jerks in a jeep, cyka in a machina, chew up and get chewed up. When it is favorable to you, concentrate your surviving tanks and counterattack. IFVs are going to get rough treatment by tanks, even the older T-72s and T-64s.

edit add: Right now, the tanks are more vulnerable, too. General Mud, the Raputitsa, makes picking them off easier than it will be when everything dries out come late May.

So! Are the Ukrainians selectively killing tanks and preserving a nontrivial portion of their tanks for a larger counteroffensive.

Test the hypothesis? Do we see less tanks than we would expect being whacked on the Ukrainian side? erm. Probably not, but no good data. We only have suspect sources here. The only other way to check quickly is based on Russian air strikes. Do we see them hitting larger groups of tanks or mostly tanks? Are those groups behind the lines? Longer term, let's see if the Ukrainians attempt to do a true armored assault. If I am right, they will. If I am smoking something good - I'm sure a 19th century Brit would sell it to me! - then, it will never materialize.

My intuition is to doubt my hypothesis and think it is pretty wrong. However, it is an interesting idea. And it is an attempt to some analysis more than on the meme level

A few more observations.

4 weeks in and Russia hasn't won. Not in 72 hours. Not in 15 days. still not 28 days later. World War Z has yet to play itself out.

While constricting Mauripol hard, it hasn't cracked yet. I seem to recall a poster claiming Mauripol had fallen in a few hours the first night of the war. That post definitely aged well. I expect it will fall and probably by Sunday, but I thought it would have fallen already. Not yet. Not yet.

The rumors of attacks, thrusts, parries and counteroffensives are about as clear and accurate as a blind man flinging mud and calling it a clear hit. No sign of the kessel I've heard for the last few weeks. Artillery still falls on Donetsk, so any DNR offensives can't have made that much progress. The claims of the counteroffensive by the Ukrainians to Kherson were being followed by CNN and then...crickets? hmm. Hmmm, I say. The Ukrainians have encircled the Russians outside Kiev! um. (x) doubt. The Russians have encircled Kiev! uh, about those Prime Ministers. I'm totally sure the Russians let them pass freely. Oh, sure, go ahead! Feel free to pass through our lines to conspire against us!

I don't think the Ukrainians can win: even if the Russians lose, as dubious as it may seem, Ukraine is trashed. Cities smashed on levels not seen in Europe in a life time. Even if the Russians are thrown out and never to come again, it would take enormous amounts of money, more than the meth addled squirrel brains of the west would be able to concentrate long enough to give would give.

I am becoming dubious the Russians can win either. Oh, they might on the battlefield, but...after that...a full capitulation requires breaking the will to fight. If anything, the resolve, the rage, of Ukrainians has grown. I don't think people here are taking that rage seriously. Ukrainians are a passionate people in their own way. When they love, it is deep. When they hate, it is far, far worse. And they are just as stubborn and obstinate as any Russian. Probably more so, at least in my sample of one (my own) experience.

back to predictions!

If the Russians cannot free up troops from Mauripol after they have taken it, I think Russia is in trouble. If they do not conduct another serious and successful offensive, they are serious trouble. in If the Russians are still fighting this war in July, they are screwed.

Feel free to mock and poke holes. I'll return when I can.
Still callin’ it for Ukraine!
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Back to the USSR. Babushkas fighting over sugar
Overblown. Some people panicked for no good reason. For one none of the countries in the West is a major sugar producer. None of the major sugar producers is sanctioning Russia. For another Russia now has substantial production of sugar beets. Which did not use to be the case when the Soviets had a policy to import all their sugar from Cuba. Russia is today the world's largest producer of sugar beets.

It does not really matter because everything is still based on the dollar price. All crude benchmarks are based on the dollar price. Just because it is paid in rupee and yuan does not mean the dollar has lost any influence in the oil market.
So you think keeping this market index peg is enough? You might be surprised to find out the Chinese also trade oil in the Shanghai stock exchange then. And there oil is priced in Yuan. All Russia would have to do is switch to that index.

Not "worried" at all. Just saying that if they used such an expensive missile against a stationary target it's because they had to.
There is such a thing as economy of force. I think they figured out it was worth it.
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Stay off the roads. It is as simple as that. Most of tank companies were ambushed and destroyed on the main roads.

I don't think there were any better ways to fight urban warfare. If your enemies are determined, you just need to go house by house, apartment by apartment, and block by block. Unless you want to indiscriminately kill everyone with carpet bombing.

Ukrainians want to bait Russians to launch a full assault towards Kyiv. It is the only way for Ukrainians to defeat Putin and win the war. Putin isn't taking the bait. All the propaganda about Russia is running out of ammunition, supplies, foods are just an attempt to pressure Putin. The counter offensive is the same thing. The aim is not to drive out Russian troops but to put pressure on Putin so Putin would tell Russian troops to launch a full assault to Kyiv when it is not ready to do so in both strategically or tactically.

Ukrainians believe they can outlast the Russians. Many NATO and American experts also believe Russian economy would be crippled within a few weeks due to the war and sanctions. I think they are both wrong. Russian economy is more resilience than they think and Putin is more determined to win the war no matter what.

I actually see it the other way around. After witnessing all major cities got completely destroyed. After so many Ukrainians were forced to flee. When most of those who dare to fight back are either dead or wounded. The will to continue to fight would be broken. Mongols invaded, sacked, siege, destroyed every cities on their ways. By doing that, Mongols also broke the will to those dare to oppose them to continue to fight. Rage and anger are meaningless when you need to feed your families.

That really depends upon how desperate Putin wants to win. After Mariupol, Russians look to attack from both sides of Dniper and a major push to encircling the East front. An amphibious assault on Odessa is still plausible or just an attempt to tie down Ukrainian troops from preventing them to aid Kyiv.
I feel the same way. I generally agree with your assessments.

My rule of thumb, if western media is saying one thing, either the opposite is true or do the opposite and your will be fine. All that talk about how the Russian military is weak etc, they are goading Russia to rush the offensive and take all the key cities. Once Russia does so, they will expands lot of men and resources, there will be an insurgency to wear them down, trying to force Russia to have a retreat like the US did in Afghanistan. I don’t think Russia is taking the bait. After the initial blitz taking some key locations, they are now methodically wiping out city strongholds full of soldiers that could have otherwise been the insurgency. Hence why you start seeing western media switching gears and talk about bombing civilians and war crimes. This is not what they want Russia to do.

i don’t buy the theory that Russia went into this assuming Ukraine would just surrender and welcome them like crimea. They started the war taking various key locations, and I think they were trying to establish a sort of beach head and their plan was always to take the country side and surround the cities to start a siege, flush out the Ukrainian army and Azov regiments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top