At this point, how can the Russians actions be interpreted as anything other than either tactical incompetence or ineptitude? They claim, I believe, that their tactical helos can operate from unprepared forward airfields, yet, during active-combat, they line them up on an airbase within enemy strike-range? These things should be hidden in the terrain under camo nets.
At this point, how can the Russians actions be interpreted as anything other than either tactical incompetence or ineptitude? They claim, I believe, that their tactical helos can operate from unprepared forward airfields, yet, during active-combat, they line them up on an airbase within enemy strike-range? These things should be hidden in the terrain under camo nets.
any evidence those are actual Russian helicopters and not captured Ukrainian ones?At this point, how can the Russians actions be interpreted as anything other than either tactical incompetence or ineptitude? They claim, I believe, that their tactical helos can operate from unprepared forward airfields, yet, during active-combat, they line them up on an airbase within enemy strike-range? These things should be hidden in the terrain under camo nets.
Hello guys,Yeah, it looks like they're simply not anticipating any long range strike. It would makes sense if they're certain they've taken out all of enemy's long range fire... which is clearly not the case here
I think this shows just how useless so called war experience is. Russian has been in Syria for many years, but experience in fighting irregulars cannot translate to fighting a modern army with nato support.... I'd say the PLA officer's experience in getting their asses kicked in Zhu Ri He is way more valuable than US military's decades of so called experience in playing wack-a-mole in middle east