Type 95 Assault Rifle II

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

why did they not design the type 95 to be fitted out for left and right handed shooter. They should have looked at rifle like the FAMAS and AUG while designing their rifle system.

Because in China virtually all naturally left-handed people are trained to use their right hand from a very young age. Thus there are almost no left-handed adults in China so there was never a real need for Chinese firearms to be ambidextrous.
 

jango

New Member
Registered Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

will the PLA get a railing system for the Type 95 so that they can use a variety of scopes and torchs and laser systems and so on . Because the way it is right now seems to limit what you can install on the rifle.
 

HKSDU

Junior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

China already has a rail system on top of the carrying handle. And if they really want to add such accessories they can easily install snap on rails. Its not that much of a hassle or concern. They have done that in their police force. You can see those Type 95 rifle or dished out like the ones in hollywood SWAT movies.
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

China already has a rail system on top of the carrying handle. And if they really want to add such accessories they can easily install snap on rails. Its not that much of a hassle or concern. They have done that in their police force. You can see those Type 95 rifle or dished out like the ones in hollywood SWAT movies.

Those are non-official, 3rd party accessories, while they can get business from the police departments the army with far stricter procurement procedures won't accept them so easily, though to a certain degree they tolerate certain self initiatives - time to bring out some old pics...
Escort%20Taskforce%20529-086.jpg

Escort%20Taskforce%20529-093.jpg

The commonality here is that the torchlight and the camo drape are non-standard issue, the soldiers purchased / make their own.
 

tanlixiang28776

Junior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

Well the 95 series does have a rail on the carrying handle.

However it is proprietary, but can add a standard rail as well if needed.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

The PLA has always gone out of its way to make its standard issue kit non-compatible with foreign standard issue equipment.

The choice of the 5.8mm was to make it different from NATO and Russian standard small cal. as much as it was because of the 5.8's own ballistic properties.

The PLA has always been a defensively oriented force, and they do not want any invaders to be able to easily use captured Chinese weapons or supplies.

Now that the times have changed of course, but old habits die hard, and I really cannot see the PLA making large purchases of foreign optics as expensive as some of the rifles they are mounted on for all its troops, or even its elite troops.

They will get some in for study, and maybe try and come up with a cheap Chinese made model to secure supplies and keep costs down.

But frankly, the PLA has far more important things to spend their money on than fancy optics for the grunts.
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

The PLA has always gone out of its way to make its standard issue kit non-compatible with foreign standard issue equipment.

The choice of the 5.8mm was to make it different from NATO and Russian standard small cal. as much as it was because of the 5.8's own ballistic properties.

The PLA has always been a defensively oriented force, and they do not want any invaders to be able to easily use captured Chinese weapons or supplies.

Now that the times have changed of course, but old habits die hard, and I really cannot see the PLA making large purchases of foreign optics as expensive as some of the rifles they are mounted on for all its troops, or even its elite troops.

They will get some in for study, and maybe try and come up with a cheap Chinese made model to secure supplies and keep costs down.

But frankly, the PLA has far more important things to spend their money on than fancy optics for the grunts.

It's more due to political satire of the time than due to a "passive defense" strategy. Until the end of Mao's era, China was swept by the "Great Leap Forward" and then the "Cultural Revolution", ok those are known facts but most importantly was the feverish drive for "Chinese innovation" and "go the Chinese way" on all fronts, everything is politically driven not by rationale, and that affects the military-industrial complex as well.

Such chaos resulted in some failed products, like the Type 63 rifle - they tried to merge the merits of SKS and AK-47, but plagued by quality control problems due to un-professionalism (set forth by the political satire of the time, in the name of innovation) at the manufacturing level, such as un-authorized modification of the schematics and manufacture procedures.

And in fact, should the Soviet invades (until the collapse of the USSR, it was a stark reality the Chinese braced themselves for all the time), they can easily utilize the ammo cache of virtually all calibers, artillery munitions, and spare parts of AK-47 (alas, not for AK-74 and 5.45mm ammunition it uses). Now how you explain that?

Even so, despite the project initiated right in the middle of the Cultural Revolution era, it somehow managed to steer away from the chaos (most notable would be drop the political-correct 5.81mm and go for 5.8mm) and by 1978 it has been finalized as the next-generation of small-caliber munition for the PLA.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Re: Type 95 assault rifle

Those Fancy optics are proven combat enhancers. Studies by both the british and American Marine Corps have proven it. and here another preliminary.
29 December 2010
PRELIMINARY REPORT OF THE COMPARATIVE PISTOL PROJECT
By James E. Ryan, D.P.A.
Associate Professor of Criminal Justice
Department of Justice Studies and Sociology
Norwich University
Northfield, Vermont 05663
This report summarizes the findings of the “Comparative Pistol Project” conducted on 28 and 29 September, 2010. This report is organized as a description of five (5) figures that depict the descriptive statistics compiled by the author. A more extensive and detailed report will follow. The figures depict the results of a comparison of the effectiveness of conventional iron pistol sights and Trijicon’s “Red Dot Optic. The project consisted of four (4) stages of fire and the analyses included information both on the number of “hits on paper” and the accuracy of hits.
FIGURE 1: HITS BY STAGE
Figure 1 illustrates the percentage of shots that hit an International Defensive Pistol Association (IDPA) standard target (“hits on paper”) by sight type and shooting stage;

Stage 1- 15 yard slow fire-

75 percent of the shots fired with iron sights hit the target;
98 Percent of the shots fired with the red dot optic hit the target;

Stage 2 – 5 yard rapid engagement-

95 percent of the shots with iron sights hit the target
99 percent of the shots with the red dot optic hit the target

Stage 3- 10 yard rapid engagement

81 percent of the shots with iron sights hit the target
96 percent of the shots with the red dot optic hit the target

Stage 4 – 10 yard multiple threat

77 percent of the shots with iron sights hit the target
94 percent of the shots with the red dot optic hit the target

The following four figures depict hits by “zone.” Zone 1 is the center mass of the IDPA target. Zone 2 refers to the inner octagon of the target. Zone 3 refers to hits on the target outside of Zones 3 and 2.

FIGURE 2 – STAGE 1- HITS BY ZONE

Figure 2 illustrates the percentage of hits by zone and type of sight used

Iron sights- 30% of shots hit zone 1
43 % of shots hit zone 2
27 % of shots hit zone 3

Red dot optic – 57 % of shots hit zone 1
30 % of shots hit zone 2
13 % of shots hit zone 3

FIGURE 3- STAGE 2- HITS BY ZONE

Figure 3 illustrates the percentage of hits by zone and type of sight used

Iron sights- 59% of shots hit zone 1
27% of shots hit zone 2
14% of shots hit zone 3

Red dot optic- 74% of shots hit zone 1
23% of shots hit zone 2
3 % of shots hit zone 3

FIGURE 4- STAGE 3- HITS BY ZONE

Figure 4 illustrates the percentage of hits by zone and type of sights used

Iron sights- 30% of shots hit zone 1
50% of shots hit zone 2
20% of shots hit zone 3

Red dot optic- 46% of shots hit zone 1
42% of shots hit zone 2
12% of shots hit zone 3

FIGURE 5-STAGE 4-HITS BY ZONE

Figure 5 illustrates the percentage of hits by zone and type of sights used

Iron sights- 30% of shots hit zone 1
46% of shots hit zone 2
24% of shots hit zone 3

Red dot optic- 44% of shots hit zone 1
47% of shots hit zone 2
9 % of shots hit zone 3
 
Top