Why do proponents of social-Darwinism all look like they were born in the shallow end of the gene pool???
Trump 2.0 official thread
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
Why do proponents of social-Darwinism all look like they were born in the shallow end of the gene pool???
I swear the evil/vileness in these people molds them to look like 'shallow end of the gene pool'
Even the Borg will see these folk and be like 'Not worthy of assimilation'
I thought I was reading The Onion.
Edit: Well, to be honest, reading the news from the U.S every day feels like this now.
Last edited:
The Chinese saying that "the heart is reflected in the face"-so true here in the entire administration.
Oof, that's no good... Perhaps Donroe should start looking at some islands in Norway? Or maybe it's time to change Norway's prime minister?
Of course. And the fact that Christopher Columbus landed in America in the 1400s doesn't mean that those lands belong to Westerners, let alone Americans.
Considering how some MAGAs are claiming that China already has a 2000-year plan to destroy the USA (i.e. since the Han Dynasty), that means those lands in North America actually belong to China! Amirite?
China doesnt US. But they want and will eventually try to get, Australia. Its an easy pickings and extremely hostile to China. Sooner or later China will have to takeover Australia.
It's just a mask off moment for the white colonial man, who has never respected other peoples' right to their lands, to begin with.
Trump's words will just make it easier for China to ignore the West's hypocritical appeals to historical sovereignty. That is to say, if China should choose to take Australia in the future, it won't have to make up some historical justification for it any more - just because the white colonials landed there 250 years ago, doesn't make it theirs, same logic.
Also makes it easier to ignore Western propaganda around Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, etc. If Trump can make claims on random territory the US has never owned, why would China need to even make an argument about territory it used to own?
Trump's words will just make it easier for China to ignore the West's hypocritical appeals to historical sovereignty. That is to say, if China should choose to take Australia in the future, it won't have to make up some historical justification for it any more - just because the white colonials landed there 250 years ago, doesn't make it theirs, same logic.
Also makes it easier to ignore Western propaganda around Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, etc. If Trump can make claims on random territory the US has never owned, why would China need to even make an argument about territory it used to own?