Neck shothead shot is difficult. chest shot is easier since it has a much larger surface area.
Neck shothead shot is difficult. chest shot is easier since it has a much larger surface area.
It wasn't through the head or the chest. Through the neck is even harder for the shooter, and even worse for the victim, because you'd have to get pretty lucky for the bullet to not mangle something important on the way through. Being shot in the head from distance with small calibre might actually be better, although if it is it isn't by much.head shot is difficult. chest shot is easier since it has a much larger surface area.
Trump confirmed Charlie Kirk died:
![]()
Racial supremacy definitely existed. Han is above all and is frowned upon to intermarry or expand. Mongolian and Manchu had their own caste when they ruled. Instead of looking at situation purely from race perspective, we must ask ourselves why race matters? It is largely a security driven measure. You want people who are loyal, and people that identify differently are rarely loyal. In the end racial policy is all about security. Taking away the security aspect away it cease to have merit to maintain. If different race are equally loyal, then it is pointless to maintain purity. If foreigners are more loyal than domestic, then foreigner would be prefered. In the end it is all security.We are not talking about royal bloodlines. We are talking about racial supremacy. Racial has only one meaning, which is common descent, and can never refer to cultural concepts of identity. This plainly means that the concept of racial supremacy has never existed in East Asia, so my point stands.
So it was never enforced, so my point stands. Thank you for agreeing.
We are not comparing Asian identities with ancient Roman concepts of identity, who obviously had not invented concepts of racial supremacy, as they were still holding culturalist concepts of Romanitas. We are talking about the modern Western-White identity, which definitely has been a racial identity since the 16th century at the latest, because it excludes different-looking people even if they don't have a single distinctive cultural trait. Cf. any of the secondary literature on the historical development of racial discourse
I don't know why do you think that is wrongful. Perhaps you think that such a policy somehow contradicts with sexual slavery. It does not remotely. The comfort women system does not imply anything whatsoever about the Japanese belief in their ability to integrate the conquered peoples into the Japanese people, because the Japanese applications of cruelty and kindness do not map well onto European concepts of race. Refer to this paper
and this paper
this issue of encouraging Japanese women to marry colonial subjects was very widely discussed in Japanese society during the war, as seen in this novel earning literary prizes from the Imperial government:
It will bring out the worse in the conservative right wing groups to stir the pot even more.This is not right to say yet I am glad there is one less conservative MAGA white alpha male mouthpiece that we will be hearing from.
His lack of symphathy towards people from other races, beliefs and nations makes me lack sympathy for him.
Also Trump just had to address his wife "beautiful" in a post declaring his death. What a sick asshole.
Had the same thought. Typical narcissistic perverted behavior.Also Trump just had to address his wife "beautiful" in a post declaring his death. What a sick asshole.
What a huge loss for mankind. My prayers go out to his beautiful wife.
Also Trump just had to address his wife "beautiful" in a post declaring his death. What a sick asshole.
Had the same thought. Typical narcissistic perverted behavior.
What a huge loss for mankind. My prayers go out to his beautiful wife.