Really brother? That is the best they could come up with? A walking art gallery? All kind of creepy peoples who do not abide by law of Nature, hates Islam. Islam is not here to be liked by people, specially by those people. Lots have been dispatched, many will follow along with him. The feeling has always been mutual.If they do not bow and serve, they will end up exactly where their beloved Jesus ended up.View attachment 144331
New secretary of defence. This guy is a real piece of work. His books reads like a parody of what a leftist would write a brain dead Christian MAGA to be. I wouldn't want to be in the middle east under his term, he really really hates Islam.
As a brain-dead leftist, it's not a parody then is it?View attachment 144331
New secretary of defence. This guy is a real piece of work. His books reads like a parody of what a leftist would write a brain dead Christian MAGA to be. I wouldn't want to be in the middle east under his term, he really really hates Islam.
I can see this guy having sissy fights with Waltz over whether to blow up Mexico or Iran first (seeing as Waltz drafted the AUMF against Mexico).View attachment 144331
New secretary of defence. This guy is a real piece of work. His books reads like a parody of what a leftist would write a brain dead Christian MAGA to be. I wouldn't want to be in the middle east under his term, he really really hates Islam.
The White House late Friday fired the independent inspectors general of at least 12 major federal agencies in a purge that could clear the way for President Donald Trump to install loyalists in the crucial role of identifying fraud, waste and abuse in the government.
The inspectors general were notified by emails from the White House personnel director that they had been terminated immediately, according to people familiar with the actions, who like others in this report spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private messages.
The dismissals appeared to violate federal law, which requires Congress to receive 30 days’ notice of any intent to fire a Senate-confirmed inspector general.
Oversight of some of the government’s largest agencies was affected: the departments of Defense, State, Transportation, Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Energy, Commerce and Agriculture, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, Small Business Administration and the Social Security Administration.
It was unclear Friday who the Trump administration would install to replace the ousted watchdogs.
Most of those dismissed were Trump appointees from his first term, which stunned the watchdog community. One prominent inspector general survived the purge — Michael Horowitz at the Justice Department, a President Barack Obama appointee who has issued reports critical of both the Biden administration and Trump’s first administration.
“It’s a widespread massacre,” said one of the fired inspectors general. “Whoever Trump puts in now will be viewed as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system.”
The emails informing the watchdogs of their firings rippled across the agencies Friday. Another fired inspector general learned of his ouster by reading the email for the first time while on the phone with a Washington Post reporter who had called to ask about it. The person reacted by saying the new administration “does not want anyone in this role who is going to be independent.”
“IGs have done exactly what the president says he wants: to fight fraud waste and abuse and make the government more effective,” that person added. “Firing this many of us makes no sense. It is counter to those goals.”
The news of the firings came around the same time that the Senate narrowly confirmed Trump nominee Pete Hegseth as defense secretary. In a written question in recent days, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) asked Hegseth if he would commit to maintaining the Defense Department’s independent inspector general.
“If confirmed, I commit to protecting the DoD IG’s independence,” he responded before Friday’s vote, according to a copy of the questionnaire viewed by The Washington Post.
White House aides did not respond to a request for comment.
The purges and corruption continue. It's actually insane how fast Trump is moving here, I think he's trying to overwhelm the public and system with so much shit that they don't notice half of the things that he does. Also, if this was China/Russia, this would be treated as a massive political purge, evidence of massive corruption, signs of being a failed state etc etc.
说真的,两者没可比性,个别网友胡乱联系。
大明230年,万里三大征全胜,辽东铁骑等快速部队、
等远程精准打击武器亮相,各方蛮夷惊呼大明不可战胜,大家认为大明永不灭亡。
大明248年,东方蛮夷崛起,双方开打贸易战。
大明朝廷认为,蛮夷用人参、貂皮等产品,换取大明的粮食,是不公平贸易。并质疑蛮夷为什么不进口戏曲、四书五经等文化商品和丝绸等奢侈品。
蛮夷表示,人参貂皮都是女真靠低价劳动力换来的。四书五经我们又看不懂,东北这么冷穿丝绸不顶事。我们想买佛郎机炮等核心科技,你们又不卖。
大明249年,国际社会如朝鲜、
等纷纷谴责蛮夷,不按四书五经的规矩办事,与国际主流逆行。
大明252年,大明南部爆发叛乱,蛮夷涌入大明,朝廷在南部修建隔离墙。
大明252年,因为政权交接不顺利,白宫、啊不对是乾清宫移交出现混乱,史称“
”。事后,多位参与该案的人士被逮捕。
大明253年,朝廷开始重用第三性别人士,其佼佼者被称为“九千岁”,其余优秀者深入参与军队(监军太监)、地方建设(镇守太监)。此举被共和派、不对,是
强烈抨击。该党派要求减少政府干预、削减政府支出、减少对富人征税(
),但一度受到朝廷打压。
大明254年,大明决定对蛮夷的睾丸、蛮夷东南部的小岛——
,提供武器和军事援助。
大明255年,跨性别风从朝廷吹到民间,富裕地区更追捧。江南有诗云:昨日到城郭,归来泪满襟。遍身女装者,尽是读书人。---明
大明256年,民间流行“零元购”。
大明257年,大明忽然发现,国际社会比如朝鲜,最大贸易伙伴换成了蛮夷。
大明258年,大明希望联合欧洲,不对是蒙古,共同围剿蛮夷。毕竟蒙古盛产马匹,现在蛮夷搞电动马匹,充半颗人参跑百公里,加速还快,比蒙古马百公里费7L精料强多了,还有貂皮马鞍等高科技乘坐舒适,会冲击蒙古产业。
大明259年,东江镇周边海域被蛮夷控制。东江镇更换领导人。
大明259年,据路边社消息,新皇登基前,曾受到宫中女性如客氏等的阻挠,一度传言有人要暗杀新皇。
大明260年,新皇登基,不愿意再躺平,发誓要“Make DaMing Great Again!”,扬言上任第一天就驱逐跨性别人士,把司礼监派到军队里的太监全部撤回。
大明260年,新皇招安大明首富
。该首富系造船、海洋航运、跨海支付等高科技企业创始人。据悉,因为长子的缘故,决定接受招安。
大明260年,大明发现,蒙古人表面上要对蛮夷加关税,实际上在偷偷谈判,要削减关税了。
大明261年,新皇决心提高政府效率,减少开支。首当其冲的就是裁撤陕北驿站,称这是朝廷最无效的支出。同时,新皇决定围剿“零元购”。
我认为美国跟大明有本质区别,美国一点都不像大明。
Purge, loyalist. What are we? Communist Chyna.
The purges and corruption continue. It's actually insane how fast Trump is moving here, I think he's trying to overwhelm the public and system with so much shit that they don't notice half of the things that he does. Also, if this was China/Russia, this would be treated as a massive political purge, evidence of massive corruption, signs of being a failed state etc etc.
You've been reading too much liberal democratic political theory. As someone with a political science university background, if you have actually gotten to speak personally with those Professors who write these you would realize that they are just glorified journalists whose theories all contradict each other and contradict their own case study data. They love to construct models that suit their own political biases and then distort evidence to fit into their preconceived theories. I have seen it many times up close.The advantage the US has is that they have very strong institutions and division of power between states. So it's impossible for a leader to be a dictator or try to bring in that sort of leadership.. Whenever the president goes overboard on something which goes against something major if the country's constitution or law then he will be called to order by those institutions like the supreme Court, judiciary or federal authorities etc. Just like federal judge who just blocked trumps birthright citizenship order.
I think this is what most developing countries are lacking.. They need strong independent state institutions who can challenge or stop a leader when he goes off rail. Balance of power is crucial for long term stability of a country. Else a dictator can come and monopolise power change the constitution to remain in power and consolidate power under his authority alone which is dangerous.