Trump 2.0 official thread

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
No, overall its an advantage. Since one day a dictatorial leader can come to power and abuse power unto himself thereby undermining state imsturions and the country itself. Just like we see in many developing countries who have no real institutions. In fact the institutions become just a tool for the leader or sometimes the leader himself is the institution and nobody can even dare go against them or challenge their abuse of power. Lol
That's straight up what Trump is doing lol

And it's no coincidence that's the third world playbook - most third world countries are US vassals with political systems based on US.

You've confused inertia for strength when it comes to institutions. Being unable to fire anyone, no matter how dumb or corrupt and/or if they're a disability hire from a political dynasty, does not make it strong. America has weak institutions with armies of strongly rooted employees, not strong institutions. Strong institutions would be ones capable of self-pruning and learning.

When times are good due to external factors in systems like this, there can be a false appearence of effectiveness. Times are simply not good in many third world countries, and recently not so in US anymore either.
Denmark is the biggest American cocksuckers in Europe. In the war in afghanistan, they were the one that sent the biggest military support to America. I really wonder how they are feeling now. Too bad their response is to suck American cock harder and hope for appeasement

Also, America basically controls Greenland already, they have bases, they are free to get American companies the right to mine resources there and Denmark/Greenland is bending the knee to allow for more concessions, but Trump wants total control. Which says a lot really. This isn't about negotiations to get a better deal, he already accomplished that and rejected it . He actually wants take Annex Greenland for real during his term.
I suspect the Greenland thing is meant as a deal for US to drop its claims on Taiwan without losing too much face. KMT is becoming US' Assad.

Btw US claims it can refuse to update Denmark's F-35s, now I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself, but with a decent level of engineering skill, it is full well possible to restore them to flight despite US objections (essentially making a F-35 fork lol).
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Btw US claims it can refuse to update Denmark's F-35s, now I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself, but with a decent level of engineering skill, it is full well possible to restore them to flight despite US objections (essentially making a F-35 fork lol).
Lmao, no way. The MIC would force trump to nuke Denmark before it ever gets to that point.
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
I suspect the Greenland thing is meant as a deal for US to drop its claims on Taiwan without losing too much face. KMT is becoming US' Assad.

Btw US claims it can refuse to update Denmark's F-35s, now I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself, but with a decent level of engineering skill, it is full well possible to restore them to flight despite US objections (essentially making a F-35 fork lol).
Hilarious if Denmark then approached China to jailbreak the software and reverse engineer spare parts
 

EmoBirb

New Member
Registered Member
That's straight up what Trump is doing lol

And it's no coincidence that's the third world playbook - most third world countries are US vassals with political systems based on US.

You've confused inertia for strength when it comes to institutions. Being unable to fire anyone, no matter how dumb or corrupt and/or if they're a disability hire from a political dynasty, does not make it strong. America has weak institutions with armies of strongly rooted employees, not strong institutions. Strong institutions would be ones capable of self-pruning and learning.

When times are good due to external factors in systems like this, there can be a false appearence of effectiveness. Times are simply not good in many third world countries, and recently not so in US anymore either.

I suspect the Greenland thing is meant as a deal for US to drop its claims on Taiwan without losing too much face. KMT is becoming US' Assad.

Btw US claims it can refuse to update Denmark's F-35s, now I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself, but with a decent level of engineering skill, it is full well possible to restore them to flight despite US objections (essentially making a F-35 fork lol).

The US has no claims to Taiwan. Neither is Taiwan Americas Syria, as Syria was Americas Syria. The US goal is simply to keep Taiwan going without the Mainland getting involved. Greenland is first and foremost important for it's natural resources and strategic proximity to Russia and possibly to intercept the potential of Chinese ICBMs flying from the north.

> I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself

Do we count LEGO® Technic? Otherwise very little. Doubtful they could keep their F-35s operational. Places like the UK, Japan, South Korea or Germany probably could, but I seriously doubt that Denmark would be able to.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
The US has no claims to Taiwan. Neither is Taiwan Americas Syria, as Syria was Americas Syria. The US goal is simply to keep Taiwan going without the Mainland getting involved. Greenland is first and foremost important for it's natural resources and strategic proximity to Russia and possibly to intercept the potential of Chinese ICBMs flying from the north.

> I have no idea if Denmark has any engineering prowess by itself

Do we count LEGO® Technic? Otherwise very little. Doubtful they could keep their F-35s operational. Places like the UK, Japan, South Korea or Germany probably could, but I seriously doubt that Denmark would be able to.
De facto they have claims because they have little green men infiltrated into Taiwan province.

The same way an Ukrainian nationalist can say Russia has no claims to Crimea or the Donbass, but reality contradicts the legal reality.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"Agents identified themselves to the school principal and provided business cards with their contact information. The agents left without incident. The Secret Service investigates all threats made against those we protect, we do not investigate nor enforce immigration laws," the Secret Service said in a statement.

Sources said the Secret Service was investigating an online threat that a Hamline student made against President Trump following the U.S. ban on TikTok.

The jokes just write themselves.
 
Top