Trump 2.0 official thread

tygyg1111

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
tankphobia said:
Straws need to hold liquid, be cheap and easy to transport.
Sustainable packaging needs to dissolve/breakdown, which water tends to do.

At this point they might as well mandate hollow pasta as straws, probably far more preferable for the consumer than paper that becomes mushy 30 second in.
Click to expand...
Be a man and drink straight from the bottle
 
Neurosmith

Neurosmith

Junior Member
Registered Member
antwerpery said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




He's actually bending the knee. I'm guessing that cutting US defense spending that badly will be linked into China and Russia also entering some sort of deal to cut defense spending too, alongside some other concessions. Too bad the 180 policy flip that will happen once the Democrats get elected means that this won't be a long term policy and thus impossible for China and Russia and other countries to actually commit to.

With such a drastic move of cutting the budget in half, I think there's a very good chance that NGAD is on the chopping block. Also I really really find it funny that people still consistently treat Russia like it's some kind of superpower on the same tier as China and America.
Click to expand...
Defense budget cuts like that - even when applied proportionally - would have a different effect on a country like China from what they would on the US. For a colossal budget like that of the Pentagon, such a cut would necessitate pulling away from or downsizing bases in the Pacific & Europe but would still preserve much of the US' current military strength and growth trajectory. If the same were applied to China, however, it would mean that the country would need to either dramatically cut the current deployed strength of its army/AF or slow down its weapons R&D programs. If Russia did the same, that would be a nail in the coffin for its Ukraine campaign.
 
H

Hyper

Junior Member
Registered Member
Neurosmith said:
Defense budget cuts like that - even when applied proportionally - would have a different effect on a country like China from what they would on the US. For a colossal budget like that of the Pentagon, such a cut would necessitate pulling away from or downsizing bases in the Pacific & Europe but would still preserve much of the US' current military strength and growth trajectory. If the same were applied to China, however, it would mean that the country would need to either dramatically cut the current deployed strength of its army/AF or slow down its weapons R&D programs. If Russia did the same, that would be a nail in the coffin for its Ukraine campaign.
Click to expand...
Can't believe people still take his words seriously. Remember he has no opinion, he doesn't like governing, he like running for election. His opinion depends on who he has last talked to which means that his actions are subject to change. Consider his executive power grab, he is going after minor agencies like USAID or CFPB. The moment he tries to go after a larger agency it will be a huge problem for him. He likes to talk a lot but his output is little. The only way to understand is to see and analyse after everything has happened.
 
B

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Neurosmith said:
Defense budget cuts like that - even when applied proportionally - would have a different effect on a country like China from what they would on the US. For a colossal budget like that of the Pentagon, such a cut would necessitate pulling away from or downsizing bases in the Pacific & Europe but would still preserve much of the US' current military strength and growth trajectory. If the same were applied to China, however, it would mean that the country would need to either dramatically cut the current deployed strength of its army/AF or slow down its weapons R&D programs. If Russia did the same, that would be a nail in the coffin for its Ukraine campaign.
Click to expand...
China has pre-Ukraine war Bundeswehr levels spending. It can only go up.

And if US went to 1.3% like China, that's everything over in terms of military then. It'd be like USSR agreeing to go down to 2% in the cold war.
 
R

RedBaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
Messaging of Trump's admin regarding Ukraine. Is it intentionally chaotic or are they simply that uncoordinated ? This comes a day after US Secretary of Defense ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine.

MUNICH, Feb 13 (Reuters) - A senior U.S. official on Thursday said the United States had not ruled out potential NATO membership for Ukraine or a negotiated return to its pre-2014 borders, contradicting comments made this week by the U.S. defense secretary ahead of possible peace talks to end the Ukraine war.
"Right now, that is still on the table," said John Coale, President Donald Trump's deputy Ukraine envoy, when asked whether the U.S. had ruled out possible NATO membership for Ukraine. Speaking in an interview with Reuters in Munich, he added that a possible return to Ukraine's pre-2014 lines was also still on the table.
Click to expand...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
S

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
RedBaron said:
Messaging of Trump's admin regarding Ukraine. Is it intentionally chaotic or are they simply that uncoordinated ? This comes a day after US Secretary of Defense ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

It's simple, they regretted appearing so desperate at first, so now this false bravado (as a negotiation tactic & image). But we all know the truth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top