Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brumby

Major
What's your point? Everybody here understands that America complains that China's "not playing fair." That doesn't make its complaints legitimate and that's also because America wants to be the only country that doesn't play fair. Obviously, China's not going to let that happen.
The point is US is just responding to a set of actions that China started. Since as you acknowledged that China is behaving "unfairly', what is the issue then with the US's reciprocity?
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
The point is US is just responding to a set of actions that China started. Since as you acknowledged that China is behaving "unfairly', what is the issue then with the US's reciprocity?
There's no issue; I always believed that the US would do whatever it takes to contain China and China would do whatever it takes to grow out of it.

There's only discussion and commentary on how ugly the US is making itself and how its efforts are doomed to fail. You are confusing this commentary and observation with a complaint that the US should take it easy; no it shouldn't. Nobody wants to win a championship from a guy who threw the game.
 
Last edited:

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Why then the complain about US bullying China? How ironic then.
I don't. In fact, I find it verging on insanity that some people blame the Chinese government's rhetoric or policies for "turning" the US. This confrontation was written in the stars, and the only reason it didn't happen sooner was because of the US's decade-long distraction following 9/11. China's rise is the twilight of not just America's, but the West's historical epoch - I fully expect some "rage, rage against the dying of the light", as it were.

For my part, I welcome these increased tensions. Nothing unites like an enemy, and a lot of Chinese people have been drugged into a stupor and blinded to the US's true nature by the economic relationship.
 

Brumby

Major
China’s navy is being forced to rethink its spending plans as cost of trade war rises
China is having to reassess its naval shipbuilding plans in the face of economic, technical and strategic challenges at home and abroad, according to military insiders.
While President Xi Jinping’s goal for modernising the military remains a priority, the nation’s top brass are mindful of the high costs of building a new generation of military ships, like aircraft carriers and destroyers.
Beijing has said repeatedly that the impact of its trade war with the United States would be bearable, but observers say the PLA Navy is under pressure to adjust its spending plans because of the uncertainty over the country’s economic outlook, as well as slower-than-expected technological and personnel developments.
“The escalating tension between China and the United States has reminded Beijing’s leaders that they need to be careful how much they spend on new warships,” a military source, who asked not to be named, told the South China Morning Post.
With an aircraft carrier, for instance, once the price of the hi-tech weaponry, control and communications systems, and fighter jets had been added to the basic cost of building the hull, it came in at about 50 billion yuan (US$7.2 billion), the person said.
Plans to build eight next-generation Type 055 destroyers, the largest of its class in China’s fleet with a displacement of more than 12,000 tonnes, also needed to be reconsidered, the source said.
“Each Type 055 costs over 6 billion yuan to build, which is twice as expensive as a Type 052D, the navy’s current main warship,” he said.
But military experts said that it is not just the cost of building vessels that needs to be considered. Operating an aircraft carrier battle group at sea, which comprises the carrier, at least two destroyers, two frigates, several submarines and a supply ship, is hugely expensive.
Then there is the maintenance cost – aircraft carriers spend about half the year in dock undergoing checks and repairs – which puts another immense burden on the navy’s budget.
 

zgx09t

Junior Member
Registered Member
US is tussling for their own interests and benefits and why some Filipino expat found a surrogate cause in it is worthy of some psychoanalysis.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
China’s navy is being forced to rethink its spending plans as cost of trade war rises
Yet another example of your pattern of deceit. That article was written by Minnie Chan. You didn't include that because you know exactly what sort of reputation she has around here. China shall have the navy it needs to dominate the Indo-Pacific (and perhaps more down the road), and there's nothing America or anyone else can do to stop it.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
China’s navy is being forced to rethink its spending plans as cost of trade war rises
LOL OK Cool as long as some reporter from somewhere cited unnamed "military sources" then it must be true, right? Where's your "free thinking" against propaganda? LOL I can find you 100 articles about the Chinese navy expanding.

And once again, no link, because you didn't want people to find that it's SMCP written by Minnie Chan, who specializes in getting it wrong when it comes to the military. First you try to discredit all polls in general (LMAO), then you post Minnie Chan?? I think Deino actually has an unofficial ban on posting from her because she's so full of crap. The no link trick is not gonna work after people catch you for it one time, "free thinker!"

Trade with the US is a very small part, less than 4% if that at all, of China's economy and China's military is currently under-spending by percentage. Plus, this 4% is not going away; there is still a huge deficit that keeps accumulating every period. If this trade war does anything it will increase Chinese military spending because of the danger of decoupling.
 
Last edited:

Brumby

Major
Yet another example of your pattern of deceit. That article was written by Minnie Chan. You didn't include that because you know exactly what sort of reputation she has around here. China shall have the navy it needs to dominate the Indo-Pacific (and perhaps more down the road), and there's nothing America or anyone else can do to stop it.
First of all I don't care about Minnie Chan or what you guys think of her. What is deceitful about posting an article written by Minnie Chan? Global Times articles are posted all the time. Should I label anyone who post an article by Global Times as deceitful? Think before you post.
 

xiabonan

Junior Member
I'm sure anyone with a half working brain would arrive at the conclusion that if anything, an intensifying trade war will only accelerate Chinese navy buildup or military buildup in general but not slowing it down....

People arm up when feel threatened, and the more threatened they feel the more armed up they will be.

If you have a farm, and there are foxes or wolves going around your farm killing your livestock, your reaction won't be "I now have less property and wealth so I'll save up by stop buying guns and bullets or even sell my gun", that's obviously stupid. Your reaction will be "I'll buy more guns and bullets and kill all these foxes and wolves so that I can build up my livestock again".
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
I know who the expert mention in the Minnie Chan It is none other than Andrew Erickson who for years bad mouthing Chinese defense built up .
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

First they say Chinese frigate is crap citing one article in Chinese military magazine about malfunction air condition unit in the early day of pirate patrol in Somali coast

But low behold 10 years has passed and Chinese frigate has been working perfectly and now entered what 36th patrol mission

Then they say China economy cannot possible support large naval build up because the economy entered S curve
Or china will get old before it get rich
But again to their disappointment The Chinese shipyard keep churning destroyer, frigate and now even bigger ship Cruiser. And Chinese economy goes from strength to strength

So their prejudice does not panned out with reality Well they have to invent another alternative reality And now they say surely the maintenance cost will halt the naval expansion.

What all these fantasy says is they cannot live with strong China How nice would it be if China stay the sick man of Asia and the west rule the sea
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top