manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Sorry man, the more you type like this, the more I don't believe you have "semiconductor knowledge" and even if you did, it's clear that you have done nothing with it except talk on forums. That's probably because the depth of your "knowledge" is orientation level at best for a semiconductor firm. Your knowledge is so low, there is no point in explaining the power of genetics to you and that's ok because it's not the topic.I have more semiconductor knowledge than you do, so I feel superior over your useless genetic knowledge. That why I like to talk down to you and look down at you because i feel i owned you.
Still nonsense you talking.
trade surplus??
1)trump determines to shave off the large chunk of trade surplus.
2)This trade war is gearing stop China subsidy into hightech. US is no fool, it will try to stop China from funding into research.
if you want a trade deal from US ,continue to earn surplus(much reduced) from selling low ended good, US will make you do what it wants. Basically stay at low ended goods and no subsidies into hightech funding.
Even China propose it will get rid all trade surplus with US within 5 years time.
Your little proposal won't work !!!!! you call that little proposal as genius work? It's pure garbage that needed to shove back to you.
China running faster in tech scene?
Not the type of tech that matters that most(just like your genetic knowledge is useless in my opinion). China is leading edge at ecommerce that about it.
No solution?
why don't you read my started thread. But you have no semiconductor background . Even if you read it I don't think you can comprehend. Too much jail time stunted your brain becoming a vegetable person.
1. What Trump wants to do and what's happening are opposite. The trade gap is widening. Once again, results are what we want, not single-sided intent.
2. Results, not intent. I know the US want to stop Chinese tech subsidies, but it can't. That's the result.
It's not making a deal to achieve what the US wants; if it was, there would be no negotiation. It's a deal to play by different rules, ones that the US thinks can favor it, but in the end, hand it the same result of defeat anyway.
What I said wasn't a proposal; it's what's actually happening and has been happening for decades now. China sells low end goods to earn money and uses that money to research high tech goods, then out-compete the US first in China, then in the world. That's what the US is trying to stop; this is not a future proposal. You are so ignorant that you are actually saying that a plan can't work while it's been working for 20 years.
Well, what you think matters is not what everyone else here and the White house say "matters" and I don't think you've convinced anyone that you're the wisest of the group.
You have no solution. Beijing has experts that actually know semiconductors advising them on the plan to catch up. Your solution is pointless and your own fantasy. You can't sell it to anybody; it's for you only. That's why you're an angry poster and not in an influential role of power.
"Vegetable person?" LOL I never believed you could mature beyond name-calling. I knew that when someone put you back into an embarrassing losing argument, your angry profane sore loser side would come back and here it is.