manqiangrexue
Brigadier
And arguing with him on culture/communism stunting innovation is stupid as well. Look at all the democratic nations, especially India, that lag so far behind China in technology and patent filing. The US poaches its scientists from foreign countries baiting them with their own greed so real American beer-guzzling communications majoring frat boys can claim that USA invented all these techs.He's saying the problem is cultural. Chinese in the US can and often do find success because they aren't suffering from Communism. At least this is how I've interpreted it. He's making a case for the trade war presumably because it threatens American dominance due to Chinese Communists stealing the technologies and know-how without spending the efforts (that's if the people can even innovate at all). All the while eroding American quality of life through the billions allegedly lost from unfair trade practices between the two nations. Chinese piggyback on American inventions and tech. That's the gist of what I think is being expressed. Possibly expressed poorly to an audience that is overwhelmingly pro China. These allegations are only partly true and the relationship is more complex than it is made out to be. e.g. it's not fair to say Germany possesses the best automotive engineers and the credit can only go to German people, all while ignoring the possible fact that 80% of their profits come from foreign sources. These sources being the driving force behind the success. Point is these things are difficult subjects and certainly not as one dimensional as he thinks it is. Especially true when no specific grievances are expressed in detail so of course we go downhill.
The reason why this antiquated notion that Chinese do not innovate exists is so very simple. Decades ago, China was in a state where it couldn't build a calculator, looking at peers who could build supercomputers. At this stage, it's just stupid to "invent" things because your knowledge base is too small. First you must learn from the world to catch up before you out-invent them. At this point, Westerners rejoiced at this observation that the Chinese do not innovate; they only copy. They were happy to conclude that this was an inherent flaw with Communism, but in actuality, it is true for all nations starting at a low technological point. So for China, at that point, could not innovate, in the same sense that a first grader does not invent tech; he learns what is taught in school to build his knowledge base and it would be very stupid to conclude that it is because he is inherently incapable. As Chinese tech matured and drew to even footing with its peers (some areas faster than others), it is the equivalent of this boy graduating his PhD. At this inflection point, he is ready to innovate on his own and even surpass his instructors as we see in many areas today. In some other areas, China may still be working on its degree. But everywhere, Chinese tech is rising and the trends point to ubiquitous catching up to its peers through obtaining tech, and then overtaking those peers through Chinese innovation.