The War in the Ukraine

pmc

Major
Registered Member
Satellite image capture alot of dummy and old vehicles not necessary operational in places likely to be attack.

they are using it but it does not mean every operation has video.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
I do not think so. But on Wednesday there were rumors that drones are already operating in Ukraine and that the results are quite satisfactory with the Russian military's praise of Iranian drones. On the western side, as published on well-known and relevant websites and media, they claim that the Russians were disappointed with the performance of Iranian drones.


It is worth remembering that from the point of view of operational art, the forces and means of the enemy must be stretched to the left bank and destroyed there. So as not to pursue later, and go on the offensive on the shoulders of the retreating enemy. Surprisingly, Zaluzhny understands this very well. But nothing can be done. Now everyone is hostage to circumstances.
=====
Several photos of Russian vehicles stopped waiting for their turn to cross.
The text on the 6 unmoving trucks in Kherson area with some blocking small road is a bit lame, they are probably using them for road block/gates... They move one when convoy pass and block the road when not. So no suicide truck or something can go blow the pontoon. The guards have somewhere to wait and it's not a target of value for a strike like a pair of IFV ...
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
I wonder why they don't use Mi-26 helicopters to ferry things across the river. These helicopters are huge and there's only a few hundred meters distance to fly back and forth.
The objective of any transposition operation is to bring the power of combat through a water obstacle, ensuring the integrity and impulsion of forces. Crossings must be as fast, timely and confidential as possible, and it is essential that the rivers be crossed without wasting time, giving continuity to ongoing operations. Air support during the execution of a watercourse crossing must be to ensure the air superiority of the site, in the crossing area, not to transport cargo/soldiers.

They became averse at using Mi-26's near combat zones after one was shot down in Chechnya with 140 soldiers onboard.
I don't know if during the landing in Hostomel, they used the Mi-26, because they had some of the models in Belarus in bases close to the Ukrainian border, there is even a photo and video of it at that airport. If I remember correctly, I haven't seen them using the Mi-26 in the images released so far, but they probably must have used it during the landing in Hostomel, I follow a Telegram channel that they post some videos of this operation, for now it's still in doubt whether still employed or not.

Satellite image capture alot of dummy and old vehicles not necessary operational in places likely to be attack.
I agree with that. But in a watercourse crossing operation, while the enemy is still strong enough to repel the crossing and is organized in a defensive manner on the opposite bank, it forces the attacking force to make a stop to plan and concentrate the necessary means. crossing the watercourse. This is another hypothesis.
 
Last edited:

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
To make it easier to reach consensus, these are the places the author posted in sequential order of tweets:
post 1.JPG
post 2.JPG
post 3.JPG
post 4.JPG
post 5.JPG
I don't know if during the landing in Hostomel, they used the Mi-26, because they had some of the models in Belarus in bases close to the Ukrainian border, there is even a photo and video of it at that airport. If I remember correctly, I haven't seen them using the Mi-26 in the images released so far, but they probably must have used it during the landing in Hostomel, I follow a Telegram channel that they post some videos of this operation, for now it's still in doubt whether still employed or not.
The text on the 6 unmoving trucks in Kherson area with some blocking small road is a bit lame, they are probably using them for road block/gates... They move one when convoy pass and block the road when not. So no suicide truck or something can go blow the pontoon. The guards have somewhere to wait and it's not a target of value for a strike like a pair of IFV ...
It makes sense;
 
Last edited:

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
The news is a bit incomplete as there is now a Russian counterattack coming out from Blahodativka, turning eastward to Andriivka or Lozovye. That's a particularly dangerous position for the Ukrainians as it is happening right at the back of the salient.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
The news is a bit incomplete as there is now a Russian counterattack coming out from Blahodativka, turning eastward to Andriivka or Lozovye. That's a particularly dangerous position for the Ukrainians as it is happening right at the back of the salient.
Yes RYBAR have now updated about it:
2-09-en-1.jpg
That arrow to the west of the bridgehead. The Russians actually managed to force a successful crossing of the Ingulets and gained a bridgehead on the Ukrainian side.
 

Fedupwithlies

Junior Member
Registered Member

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Yes RYBAR have now updated about it:
View attachment 96795
That arrow to the west of the bridgehead. The Russians actually managed to force a successful crossing of the Ingulets and gained a bridgehead on the Ukrainian side.
No wonder the silence is deafening from Ukrainian side and US online army.

Reading US state sources, they're just constantly repeating the unverifiable claims of 100s of Russian casualties each day and Russians running out of supply "any moment now".

Live maps of the battle are curiously completely absent from Ukraine reddit. No points for guessing why.
 
Top