Hundreds are easily possible. We're not trying to engage cruise missiles or FPV swarms here. WW2 flak cannons can do the job. For reference, 6000 soviet era Shilkas were built.
Yeah and not all of them deployed as you need backups, spare part sources, exports. and systems used for training new crews. Those are still manned. and not all of them can be online at all times.
Let's say S-400... they have like maybe 48 hours autonomy on their own gas turbine or diesel generator before needing to refuel.
and then crewing. Like something like Pantsyr requires at least 3 crws.. so 6000 Pantsyr needs 18000 crews. That's almost like 2 Division by itself.
to down aircraft target tho.. Megawatt class laser has been devised.It's really not that easy to scale laser power up. It's not like simply making a gun caliber bigger.
I'm not an expert on radar or anything, but I know that small aircraft like the Cessna can be picked up by airport radars.
You should ask how high and what distance tho.
Or you know, Russia can intercept them at the border, before they cross hundreds of kilometers into Russia. The border that should be heavily monitored and covered by thousand of different radar systems already, being an active warzone and whatnot.... Failing that, placing AA at critical infrastructure sites, or sending a fighter to intercept in their multi-hour journey into Russia would work., this planes are flying in at 150km/hr, they're not reaching their targets within minutes.
Earth is not such a cooperative master unfortunately. Especially for ground based radar. Hell Even NATO failed to react on Ukrainian drone crossing it.
Like have you ever see radar coverage diagram tho ? Here is an example. This is Moscow for simething like Pantsyr. This is for altitude coverage 50 m then 100 m and 500 then 1000.
Notice the coverage Gap there. That's because of land contour.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bb84/1bb8483826416c8cd668a1a7b1dea1b7d476c5ee" alt="dlrYYAB.png"