The War in the Ukraine

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
Looks like those “massive losses” from that Tonenoo attack was only half the story. Pretty significant space was captured as a result of that attack. Umanske is now being threatened.
The Russian "advance" was insignificant compared to the losses. The Russians only expanded the gray area.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Road of Death full of dead Ukrainian vehicles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
We see some light military utility vehicule but they are not the majority used. The number of civilian vehicules used is surprising me quite a lot. If something have been build in numbers is light military vehicules... more than a quarter of a million Humvee have been build, more than 100 000 M151, where are they ???

All the old ones are scrapped and Humvee got so savagely attritioned in IRAQ and Afghanistan that they have just enough to give a couple of thousand ( less than 2000 on paper) to Ukraine ?
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
The Russian "advance" was insignificant compared to the losses. The Russians only expanded the gray area.

We don't even know what "the losses" are. I've seen how OSINTers count them. How many men actually lost? How many vehicles irrecoverable? How many Ukrainians killed by the Russians during the advance?

Let's not just jump to conclusions please.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Lets see what is more logical.... A nation that got invaded by Russia and has been at war with Russia for couple years now sending small drones into Russia and yesterday sending cessna size drones with longer range deep into Russia or some random nation that they aren't at war with..?

You're trying hard not to use logic because logic dictates this came from Ukraine which then makes Russian IADS and air force look really bad/incompetent that several cessna size drones penetrated deep into Russian airspace in a time of war.

Sometimes the simplest answer is the most logical. No need for mental gymnastics on this one.
Russia is a big country. You can't have full radar coverage of every square mile of the country.

Yes, of course there is a war and you have high alert, but likely this plane is flying quite carefully below the radar horizon of large search radars. Once it gets past the bulk of the short range sensor networks which are deployed near the front, then how many AD assets do you expect to encounter?

The US ignored a Cessna was crashing on the White House lawn BEFORE 9/11. It took the Pentagon attack, the HQ of all US armed forces, before they installed NASAMs around DC.
 

SolarWarden

Junior Member
Registered Member
Russia is a big country. You can't have full radar coverage of every square mile of the country.

Yes, of course there is a war and you have high alert, but likely this plane is flying quite carefully below the radar horizon of large search radars. Once it gets past the bulk of the short range sensor networks which are deployed near the front, then how many AD assets do you expect to encounter?

Russia's air force is a top 3 air force when it comes to quantity and quality (at least on paper) and for over a year now the nation they are at war with has been penetrating Russian air space but this latest one is inexcusable. This latest attack was done by more than one cessna aircraft which have the RCS of a barn. Where was the Rusian air force? Why during wartime knowing their airspace is getting penetrated is there no CAP? There's two answers to this, sheer incompetence or they don't have the capability to secure their airspace from their neighbor they are at war with.
The US ignored a Cessna was crashing on the White House lawn BEFORE 9/11. It took the Pentagon attack, the HQ of all US armed forces, before they installed NASAMs around DC.

These aircraft came from within and during peace time if US was at war with Mexico the US would have 24/7 CAP with AWACS especially if they one time penetrated US airspace and struck a target in the US.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
We see some light military utility vehicule but they are not the majority used. The number of civilian vehicules used is surprising me quite a lot. If something have been build in numbers is light military vehicules... more than a quarter of a million Humvee have been build, more than 100 000 M151, where are they ???

All the old ones are scrapped and Humvee got so savagely attritioned in IRAQ and Afghanistan that they have just enough to give a couple of thousand ( less than 2000 on paper) to Ukraine ?
Just seen some posts, they have many of them left... just waiting for it.

 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Russia's air force is a top 3 air force when it comes to quantity and quality (at least on paper) and for over a year now the nation they are at war with has been penetrating Russian air space but this latest one is inexcusable. This latest attack was done by more than one cessna aircraft which have the RCS of a barn. Where was the Rusian air force? Why during wartime knowing their airspace is getting penetrated is there no CAP? There's two answers to this, sheer incompetence or they don't have the capability to secure their airspace from their neighbor they are at war with.


These aircraft came from within and during peace time if US was at war with Mexico the US would have 24/7 CAP with AWACS especially if they one time penetrated US airspace and struck a target in the US.
My point is that you can never have 100% coverage and 100% interception. You are just dreaming if you think otherwise. In any case, it's not like Su-24s are flying into Russia and lobbing Storm Shadows at Moscow.

If 50 Cessna-drones got through and killed Putin and all the senior government officials along with blowing up the Winter Palace and the Kremlin, then we can say it's inexcusable. 3 getting through becomes a carefully planned attack.

You say "RCS size of a barn", but a Cessna is a small aircraft, it is hard to detect. This is why civilian aircraft normally carry transponders, makes it easier and more precise to track.

You've also invalidated your own excuse. Your logic is a prior attack should be a reason for heightened precautions. Do US presidents still ride in convertibles just because JFK was killed in peacetime?

Putting it another way, why do you think it is "Russians don't know what they are doing" rather than "Ukrainians know what they are doing"?
 

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
The US ignored a Cessna was crashing on the White House lawn BEFORE 9/11. It took the Pentagon attack, the HQ of all US armed forces, before they installed NASAMs around DC.
Or the "spy balloon" they didn't pick up until it was over the midwest.

Just seen some posts, they have many of them left... just waiting for it.
There were multiple articles about how many of the tactical vehicles received by Ukraine were outright junk given the state they were in, with Hummers with rotten tires, seized engines, etc.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Or the Italians who sent trucks rusted and in pieces
 

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
I thought the Cessna drone was jammed and failed to hit the Geran-2 drone producing facility. Hitting some residential buildings and injuring two people there. Is that what passes for a Ukrainian success these days?
 
Last edited:
Top