Other than the subs, you can argue that Russian Navy is not really blue water. In fact, in all of USSR history, they were not really blue water on the level of the US, let alone combined NATO.In 1968 NVAF had 180+ Migs and had a hell of a kill count vs US fighters which were supplemented with Soviet "advised" IADS. Both worked together. Not a good analogy. Ukraine has no navy and has sunk more warships against a blue water navy since Falklands however it's not like Russian navy is traveling thousands of miles. Problem for Russian navy and the whole Russian military, amongst many problems, is they don't fight in a combined arms way there's no Joint-Command in their military. This is what happens when you don't have air superiority and good IRS capabilities.
Most tanks at this point are basically just used as more artillery. M1 being knocked out is not really different from M109.I start to think Ukraine send them to get bonked on purpose...
It's like they are angry that US didn't give them a better stuff like F-35 or something. So, they lashing out with this.
Better to lose a m1 than a m109 in their situation...Most tanks at this point are basically just used as more artillery. M1 being knocked out is not really different from M109.
they're learning the wrong lessons by spending like 10+ cruise missiles and dozens of USVs just to sink patrol boats trapped in what is geographically a lake then.
they're learning the wrong lessons by spending like 10+ cruise missiles and dozens of USVs just to sink patrol boats trapped in what is geographically a lake then.
In a conflict against certain maritime powers which have access to large stretches of open water, possibly like the South China Sea, East China Sea and Westpac, it isn't applicable. Remember that NATO controls the entire western and southern shores of the Black Sea, Russia only controls the east and northeast, and northwest is Ukraine.
The only analogous situation would be the Yellow Sea and even there, at least China controls half and North Korea controls the northerneastern 1/4. Everywhere else, it doesn't even come close to applying.
But patrol boats don't shoot back! So how does it test efficacy?Maybe they just want to know how effective Storm Shadow/SCALP actually is. The whole US strategy is now centered around LRASM, JASSM and JASM, fairly similar types of missiles.
This is just a random essay in a sponsored contest, but it is probably reflective of the thinking which is why it was the winner
Won't get into detail since it is outside the scope of the thread.
"Ukraine". They are using Western naval drones, US Starlink satellite network to remotely guide the drones, and Western satellite ISR to track Russian ships.Ukraine has no navy and has sunk more warships against a blue water navy since Falklands however it's not like Russian navy is traveling thousands of miles. Problem for Russian navy and the whole Russian military, amongst many problems, is they don't fight in a combined arms way there's no Joint-Command in their military. This is what happens when you don't have air superiority and good IRS capabilities.