broadsword
Brigadier
The noise of the zsu-23 firing is insane ! Cannot imagine how the mind state of people at the receiving end.
Men: Ranges from "I'm just a tourist" to "fuck Zel".
Women: "I want to go back to the kitchen".
The noise of the zsu-23 firing is insane ! Cannot imagine how the mind state of people at the receiving end.
Eventually, yes, but right now zalas/lancets with AI(you can see in videos how they suggest targets to operators) are still highly vulnerable to decoys.This is actually a really great illustration on why AI automation is the going to be both the main bottleneck and pathway to unlocking the true potential of suicide drones.
The noise of the zsu-23 firing is insane ! Cannot imagine how the mind state of people at the receiving end.
This is actually a really great illustration on why AI automation is the going to be both the main bottleneck and pathway to unlocking the true potential of suicide drones.
If the Russians are building 300k FPV drones, then that’s artillery shell numbers. But unlike artillery, which can blast off a round and then immediately load the next, FPV operators need to stick with the drone from take off to impact, so there is no concept of RPM, and more like sorties per hour/day.
So that means the practical battlefield impact of the vast production differences might not be that great if both sides only have a relatively small and comparable number of FPV operators/pilots.
With automation, that operator bottleneck disappears and you can launch FPV drones by the dozen, by the hundreds or even thousands. Imagine thousands of drones coming at your position in a vast sun-block swarm, each going after individual soldiers, tanks and hard points based on need and payload. There is no defence against that. The power that can operationalise such a capability will enjoy an overwhelming battlefield dominance similar to what was achieved with the first mass introduction of PGMs.
But neither Ukraine or Russia are anywhere close to that right now or anytime soon. The only powers who might have such a capability deployed or capable of being deployed reasonably soon are China and the US.
Despite the fact that the Russian Strela-10 air defense system was developed in 1974, and in 2014 it was upgraded to the Strela-10MN version of the air defense system, as it turned out, this air defense system can operate quite effectively against small-sized targets. The air defense system can operate covertly and has 8 9M333 missiles; the complex is capable of hitting targets at a range of up to 5000 meters and an altitude of 3500 meters. The 9K35M air defense missile system is valued for its simplicity and reliability. The story of a Russian operator about the effectiveness of the Strela-10MN air defense system in Ukraine.
Some think tanks (just like media houses) are just peddling the state narrative, as part of the information war, the absurdity of which becomes apparent when the reality on the ground never intersects the narrative that was being perpetuated. One that really made me laugh was the narrative on the Afghan Invasion: "ragtag Taliban lost all the battles (state narrative), yet somehow won the war (ground reality)". In the current Russian/Ukranian war, a narrative was peddled that Russia ran out of missiles more than a year ago, yet the ground reality proved otherwise literally every single day.There are Western think-tanks that provide actual non-biased views on the Ukraine War, but they don't get much air time or coverage, especially in MSM.
In Western media, it is currently politically incorrect to provide any positive coverage on Russia (and China for that matter) so the most prominent think-tanks are the individuals that tell the Western public what they want to hear.
At the end of the day, think-tanks are out to make money, their views have no impact on the outcome on the battlefield and it is just better business to go with the flow.
Sudoplatov Battalion (DPR, ex-AFU)