The War in the Ukraine

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Inside the Ukrainian counteroffensive that shocked Putin and reshaped the war​

December 29, 2022 at 1:00 a.m. EST
Russia had to arm and feed its forces via three crossings: the Antonovsky Bridge, the Antonovsky railway bridge and the Nova Kakhovka dam, part of a hydroelectric facility with a road running on top of it.

Russian troops patrol in May at the Nova Kakhovka dam, on the Dnieper River in the Kherson region. The dam and two other river crossings were key targets in the offensive. (AP)
The two bridges were targeted with U.S.-supplied M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems —
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which have a range of 50 miles — and were quickly rendered impassable.
Kovalchuk considered flooding the river. The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with a HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates at the Nova Kakhovka dam, making three holes in the metal to see if the Dnieper’s water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings but not flood nearby villages.
Ukrainian forces in the area were trying to push southward to bisect the Russian-occupied territory west of the Dnieper and get within artillery range of the Nova Kakhovka dam.

The Russians must have done it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

Right_People

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Inside the Ukrainian counteroffensive that shocked Putin and reshaped the war​






The Russians must have done it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yes, but that's when the Russians were on the other side and that dam was one of the two passages under Russian control to bring in supplies, no there is not much logistical damage being done to Russian army
In fact the Russians left Kherson for that reason, as the other bridge became unusable.
Surovikin made the logical decision to abandon Kherson even if they were repelling all Ukrainian attacks, they could have been trapped.
 
D

Deleted member 24525

Guest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Inside the Ukrainian counteroffensive that shocked Putin and reshaped the war​






The Russians must have done it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
This is misinformation. The bridge runs parallel to the dam, it is not the dam itself. The Ukrainians were trying to get in range of it so they could destroy the bridge and pin the retreating Russian forces against the river, which they failed to do. In any case they have been in range of the bridge since November so one would need a convincing explanation for why they waited to do it in June.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
This is misinformation. The bridge runs parallel to the dam, it is not the dam itself. The Ukrainians were trying to get in range of it so they could destroy the bridge and pin the retreating Russian forces against the river, which they failed to do. In any case they have been in range of the bridge since November so one would need a convincing explanation for why they waited to do it in June.
I agree, WaPo is pure misinformation, clearly Russia wanted to cut off water access to Crimea before returning that area to Ukraine. The devilish Russians must have sabotage their own infrastructure again just like the Nord Stream bombings.
 

Right_People

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is misinformation. The bridge runs parallel to the dam, it is not the dam itself. The Ukrainians were trying to get in range of it so they could destroy the bridge and pin the retreating Russian forces against the river, which they failed to do. In any case they have been in range of the bridge since November so one would need a convincing explanation for why they waited to do it in June.
there is like a 30cm separation, is basically one structure
DHX5ECYWJRM35LLZPQTE57G4LE.jpg


photo_2023-06-06_10-40-21.jpg

Russia pulled out of Kherson in November, though.
Yeah but it was because of the same potential risk that now has materialized
 

tank3487

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well let's hope that this time the Russians keep the trend of not responding to these provocations, another missing dam will be a humanitarian disaster, even more so in Kiev.
If you do not respond you would make it worse. Equal response prevent future escalation.

It is just question of time before Kiev would conduct operation to create nuclear disaster in Zaporozhya NPP.So it would not happen. Kiev needs to be sure that the response will be equal.(like strikes on all Kiev controlled NPPs).

It should be simple. You blow up our dam. We blow up you dam. You touch NPP, we touch NPP too.

But of course Russian leadership are probably too toothless for such actions. And it is one of the reason why Kiev had decided that destruction of dam would have little retaliation.
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Pro-Ukraine pundits are reaching new levels of cognitive dissonance. They're admitting Crimea won't have water for a decade...in the same tweets that claim Russia blew up the dam.

The mass gaslighting campaign is already in full swing.

Charles Michel doesn't know who was responsible for the Nord Stream explosion months after the sabotage occurred. However, he was able to quickly determine who caused the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station explosion immediately after the incident.





 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
So how would Ukraine go about blowing up a dam they have no control of? Nothing in their aresnal actually has the oomph to do it in one go from a distance. A dam this large would require multiple tons of explosives.
 
Top