I thought Zaluzhny was 'silenced' for his opposition in the stay and hold situation in Bakhmut. I guess he truly was hurt from the missile strike which does suggest these strikes have underlying and profound latent damage to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
The War in the Ukraine
- Thread starter SampanViking
- Start date
I thought Zaluzhny was 'silenced' for his opposition in the stay and hold situation in Bakhmut. I guess he truly was hurt from the missile strike which does suggest these strikes have underlying and profound latent damage to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Wtf is wrong with these people?
The Russians even have a thermobaric grenade launcher, its distribution is wide, there are many videos of Russian soldiers launching these just before storming trenches, the explosion is big for something that small.
In the range:
He also gives Ukrainian casualties, which is like over 50,000 killed and 75,000 wounded, with a 3.2 kill ratio in favor of Wagner. I take all figures with a pinch of salt.
If you want to know more, happening in the Artemevosk front,
There's a Lancet variant that's alleged to use a thermobaric warhead, and the way some explosions happen in videos which is disproportionate of what to expect from a 3kg warhead, that this variant is already being used and for some time now.
There's also a variant of the Kornet ATGM that also has a thermobaric warhead, and I suspect that some videos of the Kornet being used against Ukrainian troop groupings have used this variant, because of the huge explosion produced that I didn't expect of an ATGM. I suspect the use of this version to be more prevalent, and it comes from seeing so many videos where Russian ATGMs are used in so many non tank and non vehicular targets.
Last edited:
S-24 and S-25 rocket are huge... we talk about over 100kg warheads.
The Russians put thermobaric warheads into basically everything they can. From infantry weapons like the RPG-7, or Shmel, to ATGMs like the Kornet, rocket artillery, airplane dropped bombs, etc. The thing with fuel air explosives is that you basically get twice the explosive power with the same weight. So why not have them.
Hmm I don't know about this claim. Maybe it's the way the slow motion makes the missile look but the missile that hit the Mi-8 looked small or at least much smaller than a PAC2
How does the "Russian affiliate" even know? If this is true that would mean a PAC 2 launcher carrying 4 missiles was able to be deployed much further distance from the radar than the publicized 10-15 kms.
How does the "Russian affiliate" even know? If this is true that would mean a PAC 2 launcher carrying 4 missiles was able to be deployed much further distance from the radar than the publicized 10-15 kms.
Seems the crane wasn't rated for that weight. Probably a video from last year or earlier this year by the weather.
Some finger wagging by the US
Some finger wagging by the US
The Russians only confirmed the loss of a single Mi-8 and Su-34. Not two Mi-8s, a Su-34, and a Su-35.
I personally consider it was more likely that it was a system like NASAMS. The Patriot just isn't mobile enough to be there and the damage inflicted on the aircraft is not nearly large enough.
I personally consider it was more likely that it was a system like NASAMS. The Patriot just isn't mobile enough to be there and the damage inflicted on the aircraft is not nearly large enough.
I found that publication.
It's a real eye opener.
Here are a few excerpts:
It's basically confirming what a lot of what the pro-Russian crowd are saying for some time. Because of the overwhelming artillery disparity Ukrainian soldiers are getting serious life threatening injuries. While Russian soldiers are getting minor injuries which can be treated quickly.
They're saying things the western media aren't allowed to say, I bet it gets retracted soon.