The War in the Ukraine

Zichan

Junior Member
Registered Member
M. Koffman and Rob Lee opine that holding Bakhmut is probably no longer strategically sound. The attrition ratio no longer favors Ukraine. Furthermore, Russia is well past Bakhmut both north and south. Should Russia reach Chasiv Yar that would put them in a strong position. However, they both believe that Bakhmut is not going to decide the outcome of the war.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
M. Koffman and Rob Lee opine that holding Bakhmut is probably no longer strategically sound. The attrition ratio no longer favors Ukraine. Furthermore, Russia is well past Bakhmut both north and south. Should Russia reach Chasiv Yar that would put them in a strong position. However, they both believe that Bakhmut is not going to decide the outcome of the war.

Attrition ratio never favored Ukraine in any time. Artillery is responsible for 80 to 90 percent of the losses for both sides, and the Russian advantage in artillery went up from 5-6 last summer to 7-8, sometimes as much as 10 to 1 depending on whose report. If you want to see who is losing more casualties, figure out first who is crying for more ammunition. Personally I don't count human losses as much as I do who is destroying more artillery units.

Chasiv Yar doesn't have as many fortified places like Bakhmut or Ugledar. It's going to be an artillery magnet.

Wagner advancing towards Konstantinovka.

 

RottenPanzer

Junior Member
Registered Member
I wonder why all Western couch experts believe that the tanks are over and the losses there are 1000-3000 tanks, do you yourself believe in this? But who do I ask, you clearly believe and see the truth in this, but Russia has no losses of 1000 tanks ... this is bullshit!
I'm just criticizing people who push the narrative of the usage of T-55s by the Russians, by their logic Russia should have already exhausted their modern tank stockpiles to the point to deploy their handful T-55s in yo Ukraine which i find unlikely.

Also, the war has lasted more than 1 year, it's possible the number of tanks the Russian loses already around a thousand or more.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Those tanks came from Arseniev, 1295th Central Tank Reserve and Storage Base. Base way way in the far east near Japan. Setup in the days of Brezhnev and the tanks set aside to be used in the event of an invasion by China. This base only houses T-54/55.

Ukraine is using M-55S in recent days on the front so... meh?
I can think of a certain place with lots of T-55 like objects armed with 105mm L7 guns if more is required.

The Russian seem really happy with their BMPT Terminators, which is a T72 chassis with an anti-infantry remote turret.

That might be a reason to pull T55s out of storage since T72 hulls are a lot more precious and useful now. Especially if Russia can get vast quantities of engines and spares as non-lethal foreign aid for their T55s.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Ukrainians spotted setting up a Starlink antenna.


Ukrainian T-64BV destroyed by artillery. The turret sticking up.


Russian artillery hitting at Ukrainian positions in Avdiivka.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Avdeevka's air defense has been all screwed for some time now, VKS has been dropping a lot of bombs there lately.
More important question is how is it Russians were able to detect this concentration before they could start the counterattack? Has there been improvements in Russian ISR.
Maybe some non lethal aid is there.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
I think this is pretty big news, given Medvedev's high status and hawkish credentials. Medvedev wants a Korean-style demilitarized buffer zone for it's annexed territories. Did Xi Jinping propose this idea ??

Russia wants demilitarised buffer zones in Ukraine, says Putin ally​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

We need to "throw out all the foreigners who are there in the broad sense of the word, create a buffer zone which would not allow the use of any types of weapons that work at medium and short distances, that is 70-100 kilometres, to demilitarise it," Medvedev said.

Like I predicted months ago..... Korean-style frozen conflict... that eventually ends in a stalemate along line of actual control. It does not appear Russia is banking on infrastructure attacks, oil/gas embargos, or disproportionate K/D ratios to collapse the regime.... they simply want to get the maximum territories within the annexed oblasts/provinces, and set up an DMZ-style buffer zone. That means Kiev, Odessa, and Kharkiv are not on the table, and why retreat from Kherson makes strategic sense if they wanted defensible buffer zones.

Edit: From same article, Medvedev did make this comment:
"Nothing can be ruled out here. If you need to get to Kyiv, then you need to go to Kyiv, if you need to get to Lviv, then you need to go to Lviv in order to destroy this infection," said Medvedev.
So Kiev (and Lviv!!!) are still on the table... but I think his DMZ-style buffer zone is very telling.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
I think this is pretty big news, given Medvedev's elite status and hawkish credentials. Medvedev wants a Korean-style demilitarized buffer zone for it's annexed territories.

Russia wants demilitarised buffer zones in Ukraine, says Putin ally​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Like I predicted months ago..... Korean-style frozen conflict... that eventually ends in a stalemate along line of actual control. It does not appear Russia is banking on infrastructure attacks, oil/gas embargos, or disproportionate K/D ratios to collapse the regime.... they simply want to get the maximum territories within the annexed oblasts/provinces, and set up an DMZ-style buffer zone. That means Kiev, Odessa, and Kharkiv are not on the table, and why retreat from Kherson makes strategic sense if they wanted defensible buffer zones.
If Ukraine still exist and got absorbed in the EU, it will just help collapse it... imagine that abysmal debts without any PIB to offer, destroyed infrastructures, more than half the frontiers closed down from business. It's way worse than having Greece onboard.

Don't know how big the pie slice will fall in Russia hands but Ukraine is dead as a nation. It will be a burden for the west for the next century if they don't cut it in pieces to give it to Poland, Romania and Hungary. It would be a way to get rid of the corrupt government and give a chance to put the surface area to good uses.
 
Top