But a lot of these are not in Ukraine right now... Will be interesting to see bradleys in Ukraine, they are quite near fielding day.A compilation of military supply lists from the US since the start of the war.
But a lot of these are not in Ukraine right now... Will be interesting to see bradleys in Ukraine, they are quite near fielding day.A compilation of military supply lists from the US since the start of the war.
at this point its getting personal between zelensky and zaluzhny. if bakhmut is lost then zelensky will look like an idiot. i think whatever offensive potential ukraine has accumulated so far might be prematurely deployed to bakhmut for a counter-offensive against the wagner pincers to secure a line of communication with the city. if zelensky doesnt do this, then he will look like he made a blunder (which he did) then zaluzhny comes in and saves the day with a major summer offensive. something tells me zelensky is no longer a fan of this offensive as it benefits him much less than it does zaluzhny.They are trading lives to buy time. The problem is that it’s unclear what they are buying time for.
It made some sense if they are actually going to get all the promised modern western armour in the quantities promised at the times promised, so they would have been trading infantry lives to buy time to train up their armoured crews for the big spring offensive.
The problem is that the vast majority of the promised armour are turning out to be empty words only, with countries finding all sorts of excuses on why they cannot provide the promised armour ranging from ‘heartless Germans said no!’ to ‘All our tanks are actually broken’ to ‘We won’t sent our old tanks until America deliveries us newer and better replacements first’.
But Ukraine’s infantry losses are real and mounting, and they are depleting their reserves just as the Russians are gearing up for their own spring/summer offensive. To me, it looks like the Russians are in no hurry to interrupt Ukraine as they are making this giant strategic mistake, and are happily milking this gift cow for all its worth for as long as Ukraine is willing to keep pumping in enough lives, even if it means they push back their own offensive.
So in a way, it is working in delaying the Russian offensive, but the problem is what happens next, as the Ukrainians would be drained, bloodied and depleted and without much new western armour to make up for their losses. All the while the Russian regulars are rested, re-equipped and had a massive manpower infusion from newly mobilised troops.
It’s a bad trade in my book.
Just a spare tought, but the 300k mobilised would need tanks as well, means maybe the mothballed ones are to expand the tank fleet, not to replace it ?To compensate for the tank losses, T 62s (built in the sixties and sixties) were demothballed. Even BTR 50s, built from 1953 onwards, were put back into service.
T 62s (built in the sixties and sixties) were demothballed. Even BTR 50s, built from 1953 onwards, were put back into service.
That equipment is from Russian units from the Far East. They have way worse equipment than the others. As they rotate those units into the combat zone, they bring their own equipment, and it is crap, but it is what they have and know how to use.Russia welds outdated naval turrets to old armoured personnel carriers to make crude tanks as Vladimir Putin's forces face a growing arms shortage.
If you read that article you would believe those vehicles are new constructions shoddily put together, but they have in fact been part of the Far Eastern units arsenal for yonks. Should have been replaced but hasn't. The Far Eastern units are still using the Shilka while the others are using the Pantsir for example.The crudely constructed vehicles are being used in a likely attempt to shoot down Ukrainian drones as the armed forces face a severe shortage of combat vehicles and ammunition.
So what? The Turks used the M60 in Syria as well. And the Leopard 2A4 did not prove itself to be any better in that conflict.To compensate for the tank losses, T 62s (built in the sixties and sixties) were demothballed. Even BTR 50s, built from 1953 onwards, were put back into service.
Zelensky is basically under the thumb of the nationalists at this point, and for the nationalists any sort of retreat is perceived as a failure. So of course they won't retreat.at this point its getting personal between zelensky and zaluzhny. if bakhmut is lost then zelensky will look like an idiot. i think whatever offensive potential ukraine has accumulated so far might be prematurely deployed to bakhmut for a counter-offensive against the wagner pincers to secure a line of communication with the city. if zelensky doesnt do this, then he will look like he made a blunder (which he did) then zaluzhny comes in and saves the day with a major summer offensive. something tells me zelensky is no longer a fan of this offensive as it benefits him much less than it does zaluzhny.
i agree with this analysis. also adding that tanks are likely not supplied to naval infantry but prioritized to army. navy is forced to make do with their own equipment, and also what their personnel are familiar with, since they can now take a sailor and put him right into one of those turrets without additional training. they also likely have good supply of ammo, since they havent used much of it. overall the modification looks silly but makes sense.Russia welds outdated naval turrets to old armoured personnel carriers to make crude tanks as Vladimir Putin's forces face a growing arms shortage.
Military experts say Russia probably has to improvise from dwindling stocks to make up for destroyed or lost equipment in Ukraine.
According to Justin Crump of Sibylline, a company specialising in intelligence and geopolitical risk, Moscow is likely to have turned to naval turret because its navy is far less depleted than its battle-scarred ground forces.
"I suspect it was improvised from naval turrets because they had access to them and the relevant ammunition," he said.
The new vehicle could be used to combat the growing number of active Ukrainian drones or sent to a quieter section of the front line so that Russia could move more advanced equipment closer to the main battles." Taken from YAHOO/The Telegraph
Please refrain from quoting Western propaganda like The Moscow Times trying to pass it as legit. The Moscow Times is headquartered in The Netherlands and the owner is Dutch.