Not more than any other combat vehicle. I sense that discussion turns overwhelmingly negative when any western equipment is involved on this forum.
Because the way western equipment is presented here is inferior and often use methaphor or superiority. I have had enough with how Russian equipment presented using terms like "superior to whatever western had" or "it has no counter". and your kind popped in using the same methods.
What is actually needed is something like famous "5W1H" formula which somewhat forgotten in realm of journalism. Now since Bradley is coming then we could start with :
What ?
What happened in Ukraine ground forces, are they got grinded or they just need more hardened battle taxi
Who ?
Who can supply the Bradley, who can maintain it in the field, who could be in charge of bringing the vehicle in.
Why ?
Why Bradley ? Why not CV-90 or anything nearby ? Why Ukraine needs Bradley ? You can elaborate from that.
When ?
When the first delivery can get through, does it airlifted or does it coming from Black Sea via Odessa or via train.
Where ?
Where likely Bradley can be deployed, does it suits the ground.
How ?
How Bradley is likely changed the Ukrainian tactics, does it allow safer more protected ATGM platform and troop transport or does it like what Col J.G Burton Described. How it will operate, does it get along with T-64 or T-72.. does it use Soviet Radio, and maybe how does it compare with BMP-2 or 3, can it swim like them or does Ukrainian no longer need IFV that can swim.
You can start from those tbh.