The War in the Ukraine

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
I really doubt that. Transformers are complex, expensive, specialised equipment, not something you just make a couple hundred of, nor does anyone have them sitting on shelves waiting for a customer to show up. Keep in mind, these weigh several hundred tons. While it isn't unthinkable that Germany may have dug up some disused ex-Soviet/DDR stuff in a warehouse somewhere (happened in Latvia and Lithuania after all), there is only a finite number of those.

I have internal konwledge how about the time required to make a transformer, and if there is spare capacity and the customer pushing hard then it takes to roll out one in six month time, if no worker in the plant touched the winding with dirty hands.

If happened anything like that it will fail on test, and add 1-3 month to the schedule.

Means untrained personel making transformer will take lot of time.
 

tabu

Junior Member
Registered Member
The Ukrainian military has no MIC to equip every single brigade with maneuver and support equipment that can destroy the Russian military. They are literally relying on Russia’s decayed military, industrial, and command structures to advance. However that advantage is slowly but surely being eroded since the Russians are learning and reforming via trial by fire as we speak (this is shown via the consolidations of many brigades into divisions, footage of Russian military factories reactivating, the sudden appearances of modern Russian military equipment like T-90M’s and Lancets, and etc). In addition, the West, particularly Western Europe as a whole, is struggling to reactivate their previously massive industrial production of military equipment. If Ukraine wants to truly “turn the tide of the war”, the West’s military production as a whole must completely outstrip that of Russia.
I agree with the general thought process, but why do you see division consolidation as a good thing? It is a vicious addition of an unnecessary level of control in a shortage of controlling capacity. So is the withdrawal of a lot of aircraft under army command.
 

SolarWarden

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lol. Belarus allows Russia to attack through its territory including launching missiles but how dare Ukraine allow an out of control s300 missile to cross over to Belarusian territory!

Someone needs to tell Belarus/its President that they are not forgotten by Ukraine for what they have done in this war and a reckoning by Ukraine is coming in the near future.

MOD WARNING: NO CHEST THUMPING THREATS ALLOWED
 
Last edited by a moderator:

reservior dogs

Junior Member
Registered Member
The Ukrainian military has no MIC to equip every single brigade with maneuver and support equipment that can destroy the Russian military. They are literally relying on Russia’s decayed military, industrial, and command structures to advance. However that advantage is slowly but surely being eroded since the Russians are learning and reforming via trial by fire as we speak (this is shown via the consolidations of many brigades into divisions, footage of Russian military factories reactivating, the sudden appearances of modern Russian military equipment like T-90M’s and Lancets, and etc). In addition, the West, particularly Western Europe as a whole, is struggling to reactivate their previously massive industrial production of military equipment. If Ukraine wants to truly “turn the tide of the war”, the West’s military production as a whole must completely outstrip that of Russia.
If the West crank up its MIC to outstrip production with Russia and Russia started to lose the war, I am pretty sure the Chinese will step in with their ginormous production capabilities to right the scale. Of course this is all hypotheticaL With all the financial mess we are in, there will not be large contracts to produce cannon shells in the scales used in Ukraine by the Russians today.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

9 million or approximately 25% of Ukrainian population (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
total) has lost electricity, or roughly 1 out of 4 Ukrainian has no electricity. While significant, it is not anywhere close to the infrastructure destruction to force unconditional surrender. If the goal is make Ukraine collapse by targeting infrastructure, then >75% of population needs to lose electricity, not only 25%.
 

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member
If the West crank up its MIC to outstrip production with Russia and Russia started to lose the war, I am pretty sure the Chinese will step in with their ginormous production capabilities to right the scale. Of course this is all hypotheticaL With all the financial mess we are in, there will not be large contracts to produce cannon shells in the scales used in Ukraine by the Russians today.
if we are talking just cannon shells i imagine north korea will have sufficient production capacity to supplement any russian shortfall.
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
I agree with the general thought process, but why do you see division consolidation as a good thing? It is a vicious addition of an unnecessary level of control in a shortage of controlling capacity. So is the withdrawal of a lot of aircraft under army command.
Let's start off with what brigades were for and how they were organized. Technically speaking, a division is in charge of brigades. Brigades were the primary unit of manuever since they were originally formed to allow a rapid deployment of a self-sustaining force that contains all of the elements necessary for combined arms operations without having too many people. Those elements include anti-air defenses, artillery, recon, repair units, and etc. The division command staff basically became admin and was commanding on the operational level. Such a brigade centric structure would allow militaries to deploy more units of manuever than a division centric structure would. This is great if your capabilities far outstrip that of potential adversaries. However, in a near-peer/peer to peer conventional war, operations are conducted on an extremely large scale, and the enemy is almost or equally as advanced as your forces are. That means divisions need to be used as the main elements of manuever rather than brigades to achieve tactical level results, and corps commanders will be the ones in command of the operation rather than division ones. TLDR: Conventional operations are huge. Divisions will take the place of brigades as units of manuever, and Corps will take the place of divisions in operations.

As for the aircraft under army command, what do you mean by that?
 
Last edited:

pmc

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

9 million or approximately 25% of Ukrainian population (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
total) has lost electricity, or roughly 1 out of 4 Ukrainian has no electricity. While significant, it is not anywhere close to the infrastructure destruction to force unconditional surrender. If the goal is make Ukraine collapse by targeting infrastructure, then >75% of population needs to lose electricity, not only 25%.
It will be 50% of about 18m population. as I am sure Russia has drones and AWACS flying around to give some estimate.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sensitive information​

Thus, barely 17-18 million people live in the rest of Ukraine
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
It will be 50% of about 18m population. as I am sure Russia has drones and AWACS flying around to give some estimate.
Russia State News agency and United Nations says 8 Million people left Ukraine....

According to the UNHCR, 16,867,334 people have arrived in neighboring countries from Ukraine since February 24. At the same time, 8,952,486 people crossed the border into Ukraine.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So the net flow is 8 million, not 16 million.
 
Top