The Sino-Russian Strategic Partnership starts to get serious!

Blackstone

Brigadier
If EU and USA are willing to provide us high-latitude weapons as Russia.
We will not do this.

That's debatable. Even if China hasn't sold high-altitude weapons to Russia, and there's no evidence she has, it doesn't preclude her from selling them to Russia in the future.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
ver significant development, Russia will procure a lot of sensors and electronic parts from china..

 俄航天界迫切希望与中国合作

  俄罗斯《消息报》8月6日报道称,俄导弹-航天领域企业及军工综合体从下一年度计划向中国一些电子元件基地购买价值约10亿美元的产品。俄航天署消息人士表示,在未来2年左右时间内,俄罗斯的电子元件基地还无法生产航天和军事领域所需数量的电子产品,因此,计划向中国购买数十亿美元的相关产品。该消息人士表示:“我们正在与中国航天科工集团公司合作。它的研究所已向我们提供数十个方案,这些产品要么可以直接替代,要么稍作修改就可以替代美国的产品。在大量购买前,我们正在翻译技术资料,测试产品在敏感性温度、振动、重带电粒子等作用下是否符合所需性能。”本月18日,中国公司的12个从事电子元件研发生产的研究所代表将赴莫斯科参加为俄生产商举办的特别研讨会。之后,类似研讨会还将在圣彼得堡举行。这名消息人士称,这一研讨会是由俄罗斯航天署、列舍特涅夫信息卫星系统股份公司等单位组织的。列舍特涅夫信息卫星系统股份公司已确认中国代表团将访问和准备举行研讨会的消息。俄罗斯导弹航天集团联合公司办公室也表示对发展与中国的合作感兴趣。该公司信息政策部部长伊戈尔·布连科夫表示,该公司准备与所有生产电子元器件的基地合作,只要他们能够在质量、交付日期和价格领域给出具有竞争力的报告。而在西方制裁的背景下,与中国的合作变得尤为迫切
Mao, DO NOT post such articles without an English translation.

The rules are very specific about this

READ THE RULES!

More such posts without translation will simply be deleted.

This is a WARNING
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
The combined population of Russia and China is about 1.5billion, and their combined GDP is about 17 trillion. Though bilateral trade between the two is much smaller than between China and the EU, it shows the huge potential from the low base. China needs agricultural products and minerals that Russia can undercut Australia while Russia needs China's manufactured goods. Those are the sectors that Chinese companies can invest in with their capital.

The longer the trade ban continues, the stronger the economic bond will be between the two.

Marriages of convenience are seldom stable over time, and Sino-Russo partnership wouldn’t be the exception that proves the rule. I say that because the centrifugal forces pushing the national interests of the pair apart are greater than centripetal forces holding them together. Russian population, by all accounts, is on a downward trajectory, especially in the RFE (Russia Far East). Combine that with huge and increasing disparity in economic output, which fuels military capability, one could reasonably say Moscow’s anxiety of being Beijing’s satellite would erode political/economic convenience over time. In the long-run, I see relations between the two less positive and more zero-sum.
 

MagnumCromagnon

New Member
Marriages of convenience are seldom stable over time, and Sino-Russo partnership wouldn’t be the exception that proves the rule. I say that because the centrifugal forces pushing the national interests of the pair apart are greater than centripetal forces holding them together. Russian population, by all accounts, is on a downward trajectory, especially in the RFE (Russia Far East). Combine that with huge and increasing disparity in economic output, which fuels military capability, one could reasonably say Moscow’s anxiety of being Beijing’s satellite would erode political/economic convenience over time. In the long-run, I see relations between the two less positive and more zero-sum.

Yes, Yes...we already heard this tired story before...China is the Yellow Peril of this era blah blah blah...and it's the white mans burden of the U.S. to look out for Russia best interests...because we all know with the U.S. pointing thousands of nukes in Russia's direction, that it's soooooo obvious that their fighting for Russia's best interests against the evil Yellow Peril that's aggresively (grrrrrrrrrrr aggression) investing over half a trillion Dollars in to Russia's economy through peaceful methods...*wink wink*:eek:
 

mr.bean

Junior Member
The combined population of Russia and China is about 1.5billion, and their combined GDP is about 17 trillion. Though bilateral trade between the two is much smaller than between China and the EU, it shows the huge potential from the low base. China needs agricultural products and minerals that Russia can undercut Australia while Russia needs China's manufactured goods. Those are the sectors that Chinese companies can invest in with their capital.

The longer the trade ban continues, the stronger the economic bond will be between the two.

over time we will see china's strength increase over Russia and their respective gap will continue to increase with time but it is very important to respect Russia's role in the neighbourhood and accommodate their sphere of influence. I think Chinese leaders are wise enough to know this and be very willing to let Russia in on most of china's political initiatives and important economic projects across this vast region. like the Chinese saying "one person cannot earn all the money in the world, so why not collaborate and partnership with others''. I agree that agriculture is one important area both sides can cooperate. if the Russians are willing, they could set up huge modern farm enterprises with the best agricultural technologies from Russia/china and the world, all across the fertile areas of the Russian far east. the output can supply both Russia and china. there are so many areas where Russia and china could collaborate with mutual benefit. this ridiculous sanctions war between the west and Russia could be a catalyst for both Russia and china to explore new ways to work together.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
over time we will see china's strength increase over Russia and their respective gap will continue to increase with time but it is very important to respect Russia's role in the neighbourhood and accommodate their sphere of influence. I think Chinese leaders are wise enough to know this and be very willing to let Russia in on most of china's political initiatives and important economic projects across this vast region. like the Chinese saying "one person cannot earn all the money in the world, so why not collaborate and partnership with others''. I agree that agriculture is one important area both sides can cooperate. if the Russians are willing, they could set up huge modern farm enterprises with the best agricultural technologies from Russia/china and the world, all across the fertile areas of the Russian far east. the output can supply both Russia and china. there are so many areas where Russia and china could collaborate with mutual benefit. this ridiculous sanctions war between the west and Russia could be a catalyst for both Russia and china to explore new ways to work together.

There are two extremely corrosive elements of Sino-Russo relations: Russian fear of being the junior partner to China, and Chinese resentment of current and past Russian racism. The leaders, ministers, academia, and officials of both sides could utter googles of pleasantries and assurances, but it could still take generations to resolve the emotion-based problems, if that's even possible.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
There are two extremely corrosive elements of Sino-Russo relations: Russian fear of being the junior partner to China, and Chinese resentment of current and past Russian racism. The leaders, ministers, academia, and officials of both sides could utter googles of pleasantries and assurances, but it could still take generations to resolve the emotion-based problems, if that's even possible.

You can replace "Russia" with the "US" on that sentence as well. Still China and the US economic trades hasn't been hurt. Who is to say China and Russia increasing trades can't benefit from each other as well?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
You can replace "Russia" with the "US" on that sentence as well. Still China and the US economic trades hasn't been hurt. Who is to say China and Russia increasing trades can't benefit from each other as well?

Because the US isn't physically located next China, while holding vast tracks of empty land that used to belong to China. You could say governments of China and Russia settled their borders and the issue is resolved (true statement), however, what about the future? Russia surely isn't blind to the fact large segments of the Chinese population still harbor resentments on unfair treatment and unequal treaties, and signatures on pieces of paper are no guarantee on future intentions and actions. As I said in my earlier post, the centrifugal forces fracturing China-Russia relations exceed centripetal forces keeping them together, and I stand by that.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Because the US isn't physically located next China, while holding vast tracks of empty land that used to belong to China. You could say governments of China and Russia settled their borders and the issue is resolved (true statement), however, what about the future? Russia surely isn't blind to the fact large segments of the Chinese population still harbor resentments on unfair treatment and unequal treaties, and signatures on pieces of paper are no guarantee on future intentions and actions. As I said in my earlier post, the centrifugal forces fracturing China-Russia relations exceed centripetal forces keeping them together, and I stand by that.

But Russia right now is far more concern about the centrifugal forces in the Ukraine crisis than it is about China. Right they need China for trades and geopolitical allies. The more the west continues to outcast Russia the longer the China-Russian relations will thrive. You can't have a future if you don't take care of the present.

The US may not be located next to China, but the elite rulers and some in the population (not all) don't aspire to see a growing and more powerful China that will change status quo that's for sure.
 

delft

Brigadier
There are two extremely corrosive elements of Sino-Russo relations: Russian fear of being the junior partner to China, and Chinese resentment of current and past Russian racism. The leaders, ministers, academia, and officials of both sides could utter googles of pleasantries and assurances, but it could still take generations to resolve the emotion-based problems, if that's even possible.
We saw similarly strong, perhaps even stronger, emotion-based problems between Germany and France not a lifetime ago.
 
Top