this is getting retarded, why is it that every Indian on every military forum, with no background in aerospace engineering whatsoever, always say the same *****? I mean seriously, DO YOU HONESTLY BELIEVE HAVING 4 CHANNELS EQUATE TO SUPERIORITY?
Reality check please? The Indian aerospace industry is piss poor by almost any standards. Now, it took the French, the British, the Russians (only recently), the Americans, and the Chinese YEARS to get a working model, AND THAT'S YEARS WITH A FLEET OF FLYING PROTOTYPES! Do you have any god damned idea about what ACTUALLY GOES INTO A DIGITAL FLIGHT CONTROL BOX? Do you? You're talking about minute ajustments to lift surfaces once every 0.1 seconds or less for demanding applications. I'm not an aerospace engineer, I'm EE, and I can tell you, right now, that if India can make something as advanced as the system on Rafale/EF or even the J-10, it should have a lot more ranked super computer/clusters. Why? Because this isn't about coding anymore, not that India produces many of the Top Coders anyway-it's about raw power crunching out a few dozen governing equations.
AND WHAT THE **** DO YOU MEAN BY INDIA BEING EQUIPED TO BUILD ADVANCED FBW? That's the dumbest shit I've heard today.
1) To develpe the box, you need a plane, which you haven't had for long
2) Just because you design a chip (I doubt it governs flight logic) doesn't mean you can design a system. Airbus gave India the specs, NOT A COMPLETE TECH TRANSFER.
3) You're just retarded, but that's a given. Here is the real reason: India isn't big at all in Semiconductors. I would know. Which brings us to the question of where they source mil-spec mission specific processors. If it's built in India, well, let's say it would be anything close to the Europeans, or the Chinese for that matter. If it's sourced from abroad, then you can't say India built it.
Add to this the lack of performance of the Kaveri and the SHEER SMALL SIZE OF THE LCA, you think it's going to be a good fighter? Are you going to say that the Bison upgrade is bringing the MiG-21 fleet into the early 4th generation also? Even though Kopyo has like a 500mm radius and the resolution is not enough to actually use R-77 in true BVR?
Now, let's recap why the FBW on the LCA cannot be as advanced as TRUE 4.5 gen fighters.
1) lack of processing power
2) lack of flight time
3) lack of integration experience (which might or might not be the case now, since the curryeaters have had the MKI project for a decade)
Here is what I have to say to any Indian here who still have the guts and/or stupidity to claim LCA/MCA/Arjun/whatever else the Indians are making "world class":
Why don't you update your requirements? Because unless you're the United States, 20 years of paper work does not ensure operational superiority.
Oh, and take some engineering course.
...and Vince/yue, try to remember yourself that you are still hanging on the edge of permanent banning with your two warnings so cut the rudeness and offensivenes rigth now! Understood?
Reality check please? The Indian aerospace industry is piss poor by almost any standards. Now, it took the French, the British, the Russians (only recently), the Americans, and the Chinese YEARS to get a working model, AND THAT'S YEARS WITH A FLEET OF FLYING PROTOTYPES! Do you have any god damned idea about what ACTUALLY GOES INTO A DIGITAL FLIGHT CONTROL BOX? Do you? You're talking about minute ajustments to lift surfaces once every 0.1 seconds or less for demanding applications. I'm not an aerospace engineer, I'm EE, and I can tell you, right now, that if India can make something as advanced as the system on Rafale/EF or even the J-10, it should have a lot more ranked super computer/clusters. Why? Because this isn't about coding anymore, not that India produces many of the Top Coders anyway-it's about raw power crunching out a few dozen governing equations.
AND WHAT THE **** DO YOU MEAN BY INDIA BEING EQUIPED TO BUILD ADVANCED FBW? That's the dumbest shit I've heard today.
1) To develpe the box, you need a plane, which you haven't had for long
2) Just because you design a chip (I doubt it governs flight logic) doesn't mean you can design a system. Airbus gave India the specs, NOT A COMPLETE TECH TRANSFER.
3) You're just retarded, but that's a given. Here is the real reason: India isn't big at all in Semiconductors. I would know. Which brings us to the question of where they source mil-spec mission specific processors. If it's built in India, well, let's say it would be anything close to the Europeans, or the Chinese for that matter. If it's sourced from abroad, then you can't say India built it.
Add to this the lack of performance of the Kaveri and the SHEER SMALL SIZE OF THE LCA, you think it's going to be a good fighter? Are you going to say that the Bison upgrade is bringing the MiG-21 fleet into the early 4th generation also? Even though Kopyo has like a 500mm radius and the resolution is not enough to actually use R-77 in true BVR?
Now, let's recap why the FBW on the LCA cannot be as advanced as TRUE 4.5 gen fighters.
1) lack of processing power
2) lack of flight time
3) lack of integration experience (which might or might not be the case now, since the curryeaters have had the MKI project for a decade)
Here is what I have to say to any Indian here who still have the guts and/or stupidity to claim LCA/MCA/Arjun/whatever else the Indians are making "world class":
Why don't you update your requirements? Because unless you're the United States, 20 years of paper work does not ensure operational superiority.
Oh, and take some engineering course.
...and Vince/yue, try to remember yourself that you are still hanging on the edge of permanent banning with your two warnings so cut the rudeness and offensivenes rigth now! Understood?
Last edited by a moderator:
