US representatives prepare Obama letter on F-16s
By William Lowther
STAFF REPORTER IN WASHINGTON
Thursday, Sep 17, 2009, Page 1
US Congresswoman Shelley Berkley, the Nevada democrat who co-chairs the Taiwan caucus, told a Washington conference on Tuesday that she was preparing to write a letter to US President Barack Obama asking him to sell Taiwan the F-16 fighter aircraft it has requested.
A similar letter to former US president George W Bush about a year ago, spurred the White House to announce the last major arms deal with Taipei.
Reluctant to anger China — Obama plans to visit Beijing in November — the president seems to have shelved Taiwan’s request for 66 F-16s to boost its fleet of aging fighters.
There has been speculation that Obama will make no decisions about the planes until after his November visit, but a campaign led by Representative Berkley, who is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, could force his hand.
She said that she was “going to make sure” that the Obama administration acted on the issue.
“I think it is very important,” she said.
She said that after the Taiwan caucus sent a letter about a year ago to Bush urging him to release arms “we had basically promised to Taiwan,” a number were released before Bush left office, but not the F-16s.
“Militarily, they will help to keep peace in the Strait,” Berkley said.
Berkley seemed confident that she would be able to gather significant bipartisan support and that the letter would be co-signed not just by members of the Taiwan caucus but also by other members of the House.
The letter would be sent in the near future, the Congresswoman added, if the Obama administration does not act of its own accord.
Berkley was speaking at a Center for National Policy conference called to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
US
Turning to the life sentences passed on former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁)and his wife Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), Berkley said that the US Congress had a role to play in making sure that the court proceedings “were fair and open and that decisions were reached appropriately and were not politically motivated.”
She refused to make further comments on the case until after the full appeal is completed — which could take a year or more — because “it just wouldn’t be appropriate.”
But several senior members of Congress speaking off the record over the last few days have expressed their “shock” at the severity of the sentences.
There is concern on Capitol Hill that there was political interference in the trial and that the sentences were too harsh.
But any outrage or condemnation would have to wait until after the appeal has run its course before being expressed publicly, they said.
Regarding the TRA, Richard Bush, a Brookings Institution scholar and one of the most respected Taiwan experts in Washington, said that the security section of the Act was not well understood.
Most people, he said, believed that the Act “required” the US to sell arms to Taiwan and come to Taiwan’s defense in the case of a crisis.
But that interpretation, he said, “exaggerated” the real meaning of the Act.
In practice, he said the White House would decide on selling weapons and coming to the nation’s defense while only “consulting” Congress.
Most of the TRA language, he said, was a statement of policy rather than of law.
“The only thing that the TRA requires a US administration to do is to report to the Congress in a crisis, just report,” he said.
