Chinese spies in Taiwan could launch a "decapitation strike" to destroy political and economic infrastructure, it added.
Doesn’t the DPP already do that by dragging its feet with Mainland vaccines?
Chinese spies in Taiwan could launch a "decapitation strike" to destroy political and economic infrastructure, it added.
As per requested, a great twitter thread on the impact of a ROC led China; sure we'd have Outer Mongolia but at what cost? At the cost of being forever slaves to the anglo americans in another Unequal Treaty
China under ROC rule would have been regime changed and balkanised by the US decades ago.China would have neither Outer Mongolia, Tibet, nor Xinjiang under ROC rule.
I disagree. Imo ROC winning is far preferable over the communists. Communist takeover immediately triggered massive capital flight and migration out of China to Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the US. That was on top of the capital flight and migration that already occurred due to the Civil War and Japanese Invasion. KMT would have recognized Mongolia 'independence' to be on better terms with the Soviet Union. China would have also avoided the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. China is too large and Chiang is far too nationalistic to be subjugated by the US. Japan had to sign the Plaza Accords because Japan had to be on good terms with the US. China would not have the same need.China under ROC rule would have been regime changed and balkanised by the US decades ago.
The nature of the US means it cannot and will not tolerate any rivals, even potential or imagined ones. They were even feeling insecure about the Japanese so they neutered them via the Plaza Accords just to be safe. Had the Japanese tried to resist that economic subjugation, all sorts of independence movements would have magically appeared all over the place to give the US the pretext to use military force to dismember Japan to permanently solve that problem.
Doesn’t the DPP already do that by dragging its feet with Mainland vaccines?
So is the transport landing problem still not solved? I'm hearing different claims from different places.Although Taiwan's report noted, like last year, that China still lacked transport abilities and logistical support for a large-scale invasion, the Chinese military is working to boost those abilities.
I disagree. Imo ROC winning is far preferable over the communists. Communist takeover immediately triggered massive capital flight and migration out of China to Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the US. That was on top of the capital flight and migration that already occurred due to the Civil War and Japanese Invasion. KMT would have recognized Mongolia 'independence' to be on better terms with the Soviet Union. China would have also avoided the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. China is too large and Chiang is far too nationalistic to be subjugated by the US. Japan had to sign the Plaza Accords because Japan had to be on good terms with the US. China would not have the same need.
Of course, who knows what would've happened. Another socialist revolution backed by Stalin would have been likely as he did not like Mao. We may have had a North China and South China split. KMT may have continued to govern poorly as they did during the Republic era, leading to another regime change. Tbh either way we would have ended up where we are now, but for me I far prefer a non-communist route.
Why? even knowing what the country has actually managed to achieve that's actually unequal and unprecedented in the history of the world. You seem to hold this view that China regardless of political system, or in your case the American-democratic system would have accomplished the same accomplishments in the same breadth and manner as the CPC has done is frankly insulting and demeaning to the party, the Chinese people that made enormous sacrifices into making the Chinese rejuventation closer into reality. Am I misunderstanding your meaning?I far prefer a non-communist route.
Jiang would have been regime changed the second the communists were eradicated and a series of weak US puppets put in his place. Just casually look anywhere in history for such examples, ranging from the Iranian Shah to Ghani to any number of middle easter and Latin American despots for examples.I disagree. Imo ROC winning is far preferable over the communists. Communist takeover immediately triggered massive capital flight and migration out of China to Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the US. That was on top of the capital flight and migration that already occurred due to the Civil War and Japanese Invasion. KMT would have recognized Mongolia 'independence' to be on better terms with the Soviet Union. China would have also avoided the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. China is too large and Chiang is far too nationalistic to be subjugated by the US. Japan had to sign the Plaza Accords because Japan had to be on good terms with the US. China would not have the same need.
Of course, who knows what would've happened. Another socialist revolution backed by Stalin would have been likely as he did not like Mao. We may have had a North China and South China split. KMT may have continued to govern poorly as they did during the Republic era, leading to another regime change. Tbh either way we would have ended up where we are now, but for me I far prefer a non-communist route.
Doesn’t the DPP already do that by dragging its feet with Mainland vaccines?
So called ''Chinese spies'' are probably just ''ROC loyalists'' getting annoyed with the DPP antics. Why defend a party or cause that is destroying the last vestiges of the government you are supposed to die for?
I disagree. Imo ROC winning is far preferable over the communists. Communist takeover immediately triggered massive capital flight and migration out of China to Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the US. That was on top of the capital flight and migration that already occurred due to the Civil War and Japanese Invasion. KMT would have recognized Mongolia 'independence' to be on better terms with the Soviet Union. China would have also avoided the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. China is too large and Chiang is far too nationalistic to be subjugated by the US. Japan had to sign the Plaza Accords because Japan had to be on good terms with the US. China would not have the same need.
Of course, who knows what would've happened. Another socialist revolution backed by Stalin would have been likely as he did not like Mao. We may have had a North China and South China split. KMT may have continued to govern poorly as they did during the Republic era, leading to another regime change. Tbh either way we would have ended up where we are now, but for me I far prefer a non-communist route.