The truth is in the future volunteers will be manning the high-end weapons while the 4-monthers will be fed into the meat grinder. Currently the entire Air Force and Navy is almost 100% staffed with volunteers already, that leaves 4-monthers to either the MP (Taiwan's MP's main job during war is to protect senior govt. officials), Marines or Army. Not many go to the MP since they are already staffed with mostly volunteers, so the great majority either goes to the Marines or Army. While most in the Army or Marines are infantry and get trained with your run-of-the-mill infantry weapons (assault rifle, machine gun, rocket launcher, grenade etc.) and infantry tactics (making fortifications, marching, weapons maintenance etc.), some are assigned to various positions, such as tankers, combat engineers, artillery crew, anti-air gun/missile etc.. Of course there are also a small minority who gets assigned to desk jobs as well. One can also become an officer if one takes a test and is qualified (I can be wrong on this one), but most are just infantry anyway. After all you need cannon fodder to defend the beaches, right??With regards to the recruitment, I have posted on this before as well. Colourful language aside, the numbers simply are not there. MND are not meeting their targets (not the "revised goals"). Even if you counted these 4-month campers as effective strength, they would not be able to operate Harpoon/HF-2/SHORAD or any advanced systems, they would barely be able to operate a rifle accurately. Here's the rub, although advanced systems can act as a force multiplier, making a single person more productive, multiple of zero is still zero.
Look at your recent post of air power comparison. Only 10 years and it is basically totally out of date. J-20, PL-12, PL-15, PL-10 and all of that stuff are not there. Even crusty J-11A has been upgraded to carry R-77. How will you engage these high-end platforms without your own high end forces?
Most of the infantry's job will be similar to this:
Last edited: