I think I posted about it some time ago: I start (or may start) to nose bleed after three or so hours of a flight
(I know you probably wouldn't be flying me around for that long
but still)
No I wouldn't, and we wouldn't be spam in a can, I'm rather certain that you yourself could be doing some of the flying after about 5 mins in the cockpit, its real easy, and I hate heights, but flying is just a blast! No flying would prolly be rather intuitive for you and your mechanical aptitude, not like being stuffed into the back end of a sardine can and strapped in?? LOL
Back to the Super Hornet, its an awesome airplane with outstanding aerodynamic performance, prolly my favorite 4 gen besides the SU-27-SU-35s! Our first truly high alpha fighter, built on the basis of lessons learned with the T-38-F-5.
My concern about the conformal tanks on top of the wing are two fold:
1. Loss of some of the tremendous aerodynamic advantage of the Super Hornet, that tank will cost it some lift and high alpha capability, how much?? I don't know, but that is what scares me, no one has even mentioned that? have they? but that my friend is the real world, add to that additional weight that must be carried??
2. and much more important, I am a pilot, you DO NOT want all that fuel in your proximity, that's why fuel is in the wings, behind you, or under the wings. You put that bird on the ground, or put a rocket near those tanks and you have a flying bomb, look at the world trade centers, even that glorified kerosene will burn like the pit of hell!
fuel in the wing, or behind the aft bulk head, or preferably under the wing has a "fire wall"! Firewalls are on EVERY AIRPLANE for a reason, and its not for looks!