Shenyang next gen combat aircraft thread

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
View attachment 142581

You know what, I'm inclined to say that whatever that is, it's a different thing (either that be a previous tech demo, CCA derivative, whatever) that this:
View attachment 142582

Tailsting/nozzles don't match up + a number of other differences. I'm suspecting the one captured in video is a tech demo, an early one at that.

Both aircrafts (assume that they are entirely separate airframes) do have their respective video. Are you referring to the one from December or the one posted today?
 

CaribouTruth

Junior Member
Registered Member
Right before the video loses focus, there's a clear black outline all around the wing. Wonder what that's about. It probably is an earlier model but I'm not sure if the nozzles are actually different or just the same thing from a different aspect. Definitely something funky going on with the wingtips though.
 

Neurosmith

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 142581

You know what, I'm inclined to say that whatever that is, it's a different thing (either that be a previous tech demo, CCA derivative, whatever) that this:
View attachment 142582

Tailsting/nozzles don't match up + a number of other differences. I'm suspecting the one captured in the video posted today is a tech demo, an early one at that.
Hold up. There's a way bigger issue.
View attachment 142587
Where's the IWB? You've got a massive groove and intakes... What in the aircraft design?

This genuinely might be a downscaled tech demo.
I am now 80% certain that the airframe spotted in the newest video is distinct from the black one captured in the initial series of photographs.
1. The airframe in the newer photo is clearly white or gray-white, as compared to the dark gray / black airframe in the first photos.
2. The white/gray airframe does not have a "sting" between the engine nozzles whereas the black one does.
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
I am now 80% certain that the airframe spotted in the newest video is distinct from the black one captured in the initial series of photographs.
1. The airframe in the newer photo is clearly white or gray-white, as compared to the dark gray / black airframe in the first photos.
2. The white/gray airframe does not have a "sting" between the engine nozzles whereas the black one does.
I concur that it's different, but you can indeed make out the tailsting in that.

Two separated IWB?
There is clearly a rectangular lump ahead of each engine.
But I don’t understand why it is separated.
Then your intake ducting would need to avoid that part and therefore run into the landing gear bay. No.

We genuinely should stop shooting shots in the dark until actual discernable imagery appears.
 

Robin161518

New Member
Registered Member
I am now 80% certain that the airframe spotted in the newest video is distinct from the black one captured in the initial series of photographs.
1. The airframe in the newer photo is clearly white or gray-white, as compared to the dark gray / black airframe in the first photos.
2. The white/gray airframe does not have a "sting" between the engine nozzles whereas the black one does.
1.I don’t think color is a issue.If you compare those CAC aircraft images, some of them look dark and others look gray-white
IMG_3497.jpegIMG_3498.jpeg
2.Though the video provide more information, it’s still vague.I can say for sure wether there is a “sting”
 
Top