Shenyang next gen combat aircraft thread

M

Mearex

New Member
Registered Member
InfamousMeow said:
I saw the SAC 6-gen flew really really close above my head, TODAY!!!

I was too stunlocked by the overall gorgeousness of the plane that I didn't even pay attention to the details of the plane, even though I should. But there are at least two things I can get away from this experience:

1. The underside of this plane is absolutely gorgeous!!!
2. Aesthetically speaking, the cleavage is not pronounced enough to ruin the beauty of that plane. (Cause it was really close to me)

If there is a next time, I would definitely look REAL DEEP~~ into that cleavage! Hope it wouldn't ruin it for me:p.
Click to expand...
so it still has a groove ._.

IT'S JOEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1744313969593.png

at least tell me that the groove doesn't have 2 sharp edges that ruin RCS and is instead somewhat rounded
 
I

InfamousMeow

Junior Member
Registered Member
Mearex said:
so it still has a groove ._.

IT'S JOEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
View attachment 149810

at least tell me that the groove doesn't have 2 sharp edges that ruin RCS and is instead somewhat rounded
Click to expand...
I think my phrasing caused some misunderstanding.

1. I didn't actually pay attention to the groove(cleavage), because I was too fascinated by the futuristic and stunning overall configuration.
2. Since the supposed groove(cleavage) didn't catch my attention, that means even if the groove exists, the groove isn't pronounced enough to make the belly ugly.
3. That's why I want to pay extra attention to the groove next time to make absolutely certain of the existence and aesthetics of the groove.

Based on all the non-first-hand information that I see online, my personal assumption is that there exists a groove, and therefore my curiosity of the cleavage.

Belly looks amazing!

Hope this clears up the confusion:D.
 
Nx4eu

Nx4eu

Junior Member
Registered Member
by78 said:
A
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from Shenyang on a certain nose design. This was mentioned previously, but the document itself was not posted.

54442298841_55c48eba4e_k.jpg
54442546303_93a1698f8b_o.jpg
54442668140_7abc357e2d_h.jpg
54442486159_09cbc52f14_h.jpg
54441440712_6ed5ce885f_h.jpg
54442544903_fa68c26938_k.jpg
Click to expand...
I'm a bajillion percent sure this nose model has nothing to do with the SAC-6 aircraft, instead it could possibly be for a high altitude, high speed speed aircraft.
 
BillRamengod

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
Nx4eu said:
I'm a bajillion percent sure this nose model has nothing to do with the SAC-6 aircraft, instead it could possibly be for a high altitude, high speed speed aircraft.
Click to expand...
I believe we both (and the author) understand that the true configuration and specifications of sixth-generation fighter aircraft would not be disclosed in publicly available papers.

SDF01.jpg
However, the nose cross-sectional shape described in the paper shows remarkable similarity to observed photographs - particularly the ventral section featuring a semi-circular streamlined profile rather than the polygonal shapes seen in J-20 and J-36 designs.
SDF02.jpg
(So he use this theasis as refrence to show us) This configuration forms what the authors describe as the front conical segment of the Biconical Bump Compression Surface, constituting the forward portion of the dual-cone structure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top