I’m sorry but I have to point out that you have also not understood my point, I have never said that J-31 should be developed into an air superiority fighter, I was very clear that it would be multi role. So everything you said is null. I am not throwing a tantrum.
You are putting words in my mouth, I never said we should ditch the J-20. This contribution was completely useless. I do want to be a productive and good member, but I expect what I have written to be at least read carefully.
It is very frustrating to put an idea out there and to have two people misread it and attack me because of it.
@Deino seems to think I am talking about the J-35 and you think I am putting an enlarged J-31 against J-20 when one is clearly multi role and one is air superiority.
Look, I think it’s a good idea to have two large fifth generation fighters, one focused on air superiority and one focused on multi-role. This is what I have been proposing, but for some reason some of you don’t understand my proposal.
So, clearly, my vision for 2 large fifth generation fighters is this.
1. A large air superiority fighter, namely the J-20.
2. A large multi role fighter, based off an enlarged J-31 airframe.
They will both be powered by WS-15.
The justification for this proposal is:
1. PLAAF should specialize these roles, like the PLAN does.
2. Having 2 independent platforms makes it more resilient, eg to hacking.
3. It shouldn’t cost too much, due to 3D printed airframe, shared components, training, maintenance etc, between J-31 and the enlarged version.
The assumption I am making is that the J-31 exists and is going to find success in the export market.
Regarding the possibility of an Interceptor, I made a post in the J-20 thread to show where this idea came from.