Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Status
Not open for further replies.

FarkTypeSoldier

Junior Member
The photos look new to me. Never see them before.

Then could be CVIC sending a message out to all 'potiential' partners to lure "potiential" $$$ to complete the strike fighter! Like a joint venture something.

My heart tells me that people or there are "great potiential" that are interest in J-31 but they might be lacking in funds since PLA is not sponsoring or supporting them.

Or I am thinking too much :)
 

chuck731

Banned Idiot
Speaking of which, I was going through those early pictures earlier this week, and I was struck by how similar the actual J-20 was to those models we got as early as 2006-7. Anyone else find how remarkably silly it was for all of us to guess at what the J-XX would look like, and it turned out to be exactly like the earliest leaks rather than the later ones?

If the behind the scene schedule of j-20 roughly approximated that of some other recent fighters, then I would say the preferred configuration of j-20 may have been determined long before 2006, I wouldn't be surprised if it were already more or less determined even before 2000. Afterwards the race was for the canard delta configuration to lose, and any alternative configuration had very long shots to overcome the preference.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
If the behind the scene schedule of j-20 roughly approximated that of some other recent fighters, then I would say the preferred configuration of j-20 may have been determined long before 2006, I wouldn't be surprised if it were already more or less determined even before 2000. Afterwards the race was for the canard delta configuration to lose, and any alternative configuration had very long shots to overcome the preference.

We got the triplane and canard delta CGs of the J-XX at the same time, so chances are it's as the unconfirmed timeline indicated, which was that the design was chosen in 2007-8, but both SAC and CAC's entry were finalized by 2006-7.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Speaking of which, I was going through those early pictures earlier this week, and I was struck by how similar the actual J-20 was to those models we got as early as 2006-7. Anyone else find how remarkably silly it was for all of us to guess at what the J-XX would look like, and it turned out to be exactly like the earliest leaks rather than the later ones?

Remember these?

J-XX_42906.jpg

j-xx-image09.jpg


Spooky how close they got to the real thing.
Second one especially. You could overlay a plan image of the J-20 over it and the geometry would fit near perfectly.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Remember these?

J-XX_42906.jpg

j-xx-image09.jpg


Spooky how close they got to the real thing.
Second one especially. You could overlay a plan image of the J-20 over it and the geometry would fit near perfectly.

Exactly what I was referring to XD. And here we were digging around for more exotic planforms for years.
 

Quickie

Colonel
Speaking of which, I was going through those early pictures earlier this week, and I was struck by how similar the actual J-20 was to those models we got as early as 2006-7. Anyone else find how remarkably silly it was for all of us to guess at what the J-XX would look like, and it turned out to be exactly like the earliest leaks rather than the later ones?

It was a genuine leak down to the details, and yet no one realized it as it is at the time. It didn't help either with the CGs looking unfinished with the missing cockpit canopy.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
It was a genuine leak down to the details, and yet no one realized it as it is at the time. It didn't help either with the CGs looking unfinished with the missing cockpit canopy.

Well, nothing spooky about it, somebody had it right, some continued not to accept the truth, but in any respect, right or wrong, it does illustrate .how "cutting edge" the Sino Defense" forum actually is. Lots of fanboy art is entertainning, and "gap filler", whether pictures or aerodynamic speculation, its all good as long as we maintain the standard of truth and honesty.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
:p:p:p:p:p
 

Attachments

  • J-31 - 17.11.13 - 1.jpg
    J-31 - 17.11.13 - 1.jpg
    78.4 KB · Views: 198

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Just found but I don't know if they are already older !
 

Attachments

  • J-31 - 2.12.13 - 1.jpg
    J-31 - 2.12.13 - 1.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 93
  • J-31 - 2.12.13 - 2.jpg
    J-31 - 2.12.13 - 2.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 75
  • J-31 - 2.12.13 - 3.jpg
    J-31 - 2.12.13 - 3.jpg
    71.5 KB · Views: 80
  • J-31 - 2.12.13 - 4.jpg
    J-31 - 2.12.13 - 4.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 87
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top