Self Propelled Gun/Rocket Launcher

sr338

New Member
Registered Member
The one in arabic I believe is from 2022 (290km), and the one in simplified/traditional Chinese (400km) from memory was from 2021 if not earlier.

I suspect both were export numbers, but they further downgraded the 400km to "290km" for MTCR purposes.


If we are speculating as to what the true range of the PLA version of the missile is (if it is indeed the same as FD280) then I could definitely see it achieving in excess of 400km, like 500km or even more. Though I do also note that the side profile of the missile in the official PLA image of the missile launch looks a bit longer than the FD280; it may well be a custom PLA version that might be a bit longer than the standard FD280 if the longer profile is not merely an illusion, meaning it could even be longer ranged than 500km if it is longer than FD280 while retaining the same cross sectional diameter.

So the American report posted on another thread has those range numbers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Snag_35ed111b.png

Here is how those range would look like on a map:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
So the American report posted on another thread has those range numbers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 121286

Here is how those range would look like on a map:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The CMSI article was already posted in this thread earlier a couple of pages back, and included some range circles as well in the pdf itself.

Range circles are useful, and both google earth and the mapdevelopers site are useful tools to visualize things, though again the CMSI article's specs for the different rockets/missiles are based on export numbers for most if not all of them, which likely doesn't reflect the PLA versions of the weapons.


I don't see a need to focus in too much detail about the CMSI article's specs based off the export numbers. The important thing is to estimate where the approximate capability/range category of these payloads are likely to be.
 

by78

General
More images of the PLZ-45A4, showing the ammo stowage areas and vehicle interior. Additional rounds (at least 10 rounds?) are stored in separate compartments in the rear of the turret.


53261861416_626fdfe253_k.jpg

More interior images of the PLZ-45A4, including a look at the driver's compartment (first two images).

53329397934_91afb09f7a_o.jpg
53329053351_a04c5d618e_o.jpg

53329515925_7ceab1e15c_o.jpg
53329279383_345bc050b0_o.jpg
 

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member
So the American report posted on another thread has those range numbers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 121286

Here is how those range would look like on a map:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
this kind of range will require a very high level of joint operations, as the PLAGF may not be able to achieve the full potential of its firepower with just its own UAV. it will have to rely on PLAAF assets for some of its target acquisition.
 

sr338

New Member
Registered Member
this kind of range will require a very high level of joint operations, as the PLAGF may not be able to achieve the full potential of its firepower with just its own UAV. it will have to rely on PLAAF assets for some of its target acquisition.
I think the current target acquisition of the PLAGF's UAVs are in the 600km. So having a 500km TBM option make senses
 
Top