Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

thunderchief

Senior Member
Russian designations are well forgettable. normally a randomized combination of numerals and letters often used only by technical papers that rarely leave the military environment.

Well, not exactly :p

Killer Names: The Funny Side of Some of Russia's Most Lethal Weaponry


From small arms to tanks to aircraft to intercontinental ballistic missiles, Soviet and Russian military design bureaus have a long history of trolling potential adversaries by thinking up funny and endearing names for their weapons systems.


Russian tank designers seem to be some of the best-known trolls, making up understated and gentle names for their death on wheels designs. For instance, designers named the T-72B2, a heavily modernized variant of the T-72, the 'Slingshot' (Rogatka). Another modernized variant of the T-72, the T-72M1, has been nicknamed the 'Banana' (Banan). Meanwhile, the world's most powerful flamethrower system attached to a tank chassis, the TOS-1, has been given the moniker 'Pinocchio', (Buratino).

1019006443.jpg

© Sputnik/ Artem Zhitenev
The TOS-1A variant of the TOS-1 'Buratino' (Pinocchio) heavy flamethrower, nicknamed the 'Solntsopek' (Sun Heat).
Designers of self-propelled artillery systems are just as humble, if a little less creative, naming a series of vehicles after flowers. This includes the 2S1 'Gvozdika' (Carnation), the 2S3, 'Acacia' (Akatsiya), the 2S4 'Tulip' (Tyulpan), the 2S5 'Hyacinth' (Giatsint), and the 2S7 'Pion', the last of which is capable of shooting nuclear artillery rounds. The Russian military analysis site TopWar.ru once commented on this series of weapons, noting that "it is unlikely that any potential adversary would like to smell such a bouquet." ...........................................

Continues :
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Russian-Navy-to-Expand-Its-Black-Sea-Fleet.jpg

Naval Today said:
The Russian Navy plans to expand its Black Sea Fleet with at least one Admiral Grigorovich-class frigate this year.

The second warship of this project, Admiral Essen, should soon be launched from the Yantar shipbuilding plant in Kaliningrad. The shipyard expects to build six vessels of the same class in the near future.

Other vessels that will be added to the Black Sea Fleet include 2 small-sized missile ships “Zeleny Dol” and “Serpukhov”, and submarines “Novorossiysk” and “Rostov-on-Don” (project 636.3), which are the first in the series of 6 new diesel-electric submarines to be built for the Fleet. Also, in 2015 the Black Sea Fleet sailors will be introduced to a modern tug boat “Professor Nikolay Muru” (project 22870).

The Fleet received more than ten motor vessels and auxiliary ships over the past year and a half, among them anti-sabotage motor boats, speed patrol boats, diving boats and tugs.

Naval Today Staff, Image: Russian Ministry of Defence
 

aksha

Captain
lApBxdf.jpg

found this in one of the russian forums
they say that this be the reason why their isn't flat nozzles on the PAK-FA.
Round nozzles that reduce IR-signature without getting rid of 3-D vectoring. but i do not know russian
 
lApBxdf.jpg

found this in one of the russian forums
they say that this be the reason why their isn't flat nozzles on the PAK-FA.
Round nozzles that reduce IR-signature without getting rid of 3-D vectoring. but i do not know russian

aksha: from what I know (from the translation I did :) https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/pak-fa-fgfa-discussions.t7155/page-18#post-322468) about the T-50's nozzles is that they
can be changed from round to flat (to hide the turbine, but at the expense of loosing five to seven percents of the thrust);
the top-middle panel of the chart you posted
(https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/russian-military-news-thread.t1545/page-153#post-330013)
shows the respective IR signatures ... I went through the whole page anyway, but didn't see anything related to what you said ... I might've missed something ... or could be some wild stuff on that Russian forum (which would pretty normal ROFL) or you misunderstood -- what forum was it? you used google-translate?

EDIT
if you want, post the link here and I would have look at what the Russians "exactly" said
 
Last edited:
Top