ajaybhutani
New Member
and now its 2005.. its already in service and is being produced at 20-24 a year.the fact that army went ahead with it. even before the upgrades are not in the copters yet.. ( shaki and israeli avionics are not in production yet).. itself shows that its good..or else it wouldnt have said yes to induction and instead gone for a foreign heli.. like it did at the time of arjun( procured T90).MIGleader said:because the indian army thought the 1999 war was a good time to test the dhruv in actualy combat. but it didnt meet expectations, therfor got soem upgrades, ENTERING SERVICE in 2001.
i wouldnt make claims like dhruv is the best in its class. of course i dont have enough technical info to claim that.. but i would definitely say one thing.. its decent as it has met indian armed forces specifications( which are quite stringent..considering that they even rejected T90 in trials and sent it back for improvements.. ). or that they decided to wait and get an SU30MKI with all not so good russian stuff replaced with indian israeli french stuff.
to add on israeli avionics are well known...
israeli's have plans to purchase a few and are also marketing it.
of course the cost advantage is quite evident here.. due to low cost of production in india..