Sleepy34 is such a fool. By the same logic, China could hurt the American auto industry badly because the US uses so many Chinese auto parts like tires, windshields, etc. Same can be said for many other industries of the US, too.
All capital inputs in general, actually.
Ever heard of RIGOL? It is a Chinese company which makes alternative better spec and cheaper products for the segments Agilent (now Keysight) used to sell in.
That's some fancy lawyer tongue for "We made it harder for you and you took it like a training exercise to become self-sufficient." The politicians got to say that they stuck it to China, but they burned their own fields on the way out leaving the next generation of US politicians to face a much stronger and self-reliant China.
LOL What wishful thinking! When has that ever happened despite the countless desperate attempts from America? When has China ever failed to develop a technology denied to it? Many places are insulated but know what's so special about the Galapagoes Islands? They're small as hell. Know why they don't call it "Australia-ized?" Because even that is way too large to be isolated not to mention a China that is the largest innovation tech country in the world.
Try it. Lose a tentacle every time you reach out with it as a weapon. America never learns from the past and I wouldn't have it any other way.
China plans to launch an ultra-secure global communications service by 2027, integrating its quantum satellite constellation with ground-based networks. Led by physicist Pan Jianwei, known as the "father of quantum", the project aims to provide practical large-scale quantum communications within the next decade..
In the future, please change your link from x.com to twitter.com to have it show up correctly.
What would be some uses of this type of network? Would it be primarily for military purposes? Or financial transactions?