Why do you try to pretend to be a moderator when you are not? Nowhere does it says in the tread start that this is some HD only thread so stop spreading your imagination as facts.Is there anything special about these horribly grainy and low-resolution photos of QBU-191? Am I missing something?
Why do you insist on sharing photos that are only 1080 pixels wide? We live in 2023, not 1993. If your photos are less than 1600 pixels in width or don't show something new or interesting, then don't post them.
Let me remind you for the third time: this thread is not a gallery page or for depositing every garbage photos you can find on the internet.
Why do you try to pretend to be a moderator when you are not? Nowhere does it says in the tread start that this is some HD only thread so stop spreading your imagination as facts.
Or if they develop a heavier soft tip or hollow point 5.8mm round specifically for the PAP/policeLet's see... even shorter barrel, new buttstock...
Probably in response to those operators who already got used to the compactness of 95-1 carbine. Sure the ballistic performance will suffer but since the typical operational environments are those <100m engagement range, that's acceptable I guess?