PLAN SCS Bases/Islands/Vessels (Not a Strategy Page)

Equation

Lieutenant General
Can you please explain to me why the hell you think I am flame baiting here. If I asked whether a PLAN SOF team could overrun a Vietnamese atoll in the SCS, I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that you would NOT consider it a flame baiting question, so EXPLAIN YOURSELF.

So why didn't you in the first place? I thought so. You were targeting towards a specific audience therefore that makes your previous comment as flame bait.
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
So why didn't you in the first place? I thought so. You were targeting towards a specific audience therefore that makes your previous comment as flame bait.
JHC I posed the question because a PLA soldier was standing guard at a SCS base. I might have posed the question if a Vietnamese soldier were photographed standing guard at one of their SCS bases. The fact that you think I am flame baiting speaks FAR more about what kind of easily-butthurt mentality you have than about any kind of motivation on my part. I don't flame bait. EVER. Get that into your fanboi head.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
JHC I posed the question because a PLA soldier was standing guard at a SCS base. I might have posed the question if a Vietnamese soldier were photographed standing guard at one of their SCS bases. The fact that you think I am flame baiting speaks FAR more about what kind of easily-butthurt mentality you have than about any kind of motivation on my part. I don't flame bait. EVER. Get that into your fanboi head.

But you knew this is Chinese defense forum, therefore you posted that comment as flame baiting. You knew that there isn't a Vietnamese soldier standing guard on the photograph along one of their bases in SCS and to use it as an excuse hide your intention. Of course you could open up a thread that shows a pic of any Vietnamese soldier guarding in post in SCS and make that same comment, but you didn't. Therefore that says a lot about your character. I'm just calling you out as troll, that's all. If you don't like it, than go see therapy.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
But you knew this is Chinese defense forum, therefore you posted that comment as flame baiting. You knew that there isn't a Vietnamese soldier standing guard on the photograph along one of their bases in SCS and to use it as an excuse hide your intention. Of course you could open up a thread that shows a pic of any Vietnamese soldier guarding in post in SCS and make that same comment, but you didn't. Therefore that says a lot about your character. I'm just calling you out as troll, that's all. If you don't like it, than go see therapy.
Unless you claim you could read the OP's mind, there's isn't enough evidence to call him or her a forum troll, not for non-fanbois anyway.
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
But you knew this is Chinese defense forum, therefore you posted that comment as flame baiting. You knew that there isn't a Vietnamese soldier standing guard on the photograph along one of their bases in SCS and to use it as an excuse hide your intention. Of course you could open up a thread that shows a pic of any Vietnamese soldier guarding in post in SCS and make that same comment, but you didn't. Therefore that says a lot about your character. I'm just calling you out as troll, that's all. If you don't like it, than go see therapy.
Delicate tulip, if the definition of "flamebait" was whatever offended your easily-offended sensibilities, then SDF would be reduced to talking about nothing except how massively awesome and overwhelming the PLA is and how it would kick ass in any and every possible situation throughout all of time and space. You sound just like those deluded easily-triggered fanbois on Bharat Rakshak forums. Asking about ways in which the US military could attack China's SCS holdings is entirely legitimate and well-within the scope of this forum. That you became triggered into a foaming-at-the-mouth rage by something so simple says mountains about you. You've been easily triggered multiple times in the past by legitimate statements from other posters, so there is DEFINITELY conclusive evidence that you are, in point of fact, a rabid fanboi.
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
Delicate tulip, if the definition of "flamebait" was whatever offended your easily-offended sensibilities, then SDF would be reduced to talking about how massively awesome and overwhelming the PLA is and how it would kick ass in any and every possible situation throughout all of history. You sound just like those deluded easily-triggered fanbois on Bharat Rakshak forums. Asking about ways in which the US military could attack China's SCS holdings is entirely legitimate and well-within the scope of this forum. That you became triggered into a frothing rage by something so simple says mountains about you.

You sound like you have nothing smart to say. This is what a troll such as yourself will resort to childish name calling and inventing lies to ignore the debate. When you are done crying feel free to go see a psychiatrist to get you the medication that you needed.
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
You sound like you have nothing smart to say. This is what a troll such as yourself will resort to childish name calling and inventing lies to ignore the debate. When you are done crying feel free to go see a psychiatrist to get you the medication that you needed.
I could much more easily say the same about you, my easily-triggered tulip. Now please tell me which "lies" I have "invented" in order to "ignore" the "debate". Which debate are you referring to, BTW? The one about whether you're an easily-triggered PLA fanboi? I think that debate has already been definitively settled a long time ago.
 

jacksprat

New Member
I could much more easily say the same about you, my easily-triggered tulip. Now please tell me which "lies" I have "invented" in order to "ignore" the "debate". Which debate are you referring to, BTW? The one about whether you're an easily-triggered PLA fanboi? I think that debate has already been definitively settled a long time ago.


Both of you need to a time out before the moderators do it for you.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
I could much more easily say the same about you, my easily-triggered tulip. Now please tell me which "lies" I have "invented" in order to "ignore" the "debate". Which debate are you referring to, BTW? The one about whether you're an easily-triggered PLA fanboi? I think that debate has already been definitively settled a long time ago.

No you don't. You are the one that started this flame baiting and I'm just calling you out for it. You can try all your might masking the debate by name calling someone a fan bois and such and pretend to demand proof, won't change the fact that you made the shot and than call foul.
 
Top