PLAN Carrier Strike Group and Airwing

by78

General
Re: What will the 1st PLAN Carrier Air Wing look like?

Sorry, and maybe I misunderstand Your comment, but why do You thin so in regard to NOT having a degree in English literature ?? Is his English so bad ? :confused:

I know him since many years both from Harpia Publishing (for my book) and Combat Aircraft Monthly where he's always responsible to edit my typical "German-School-English" into an understandable and readable text and so far I think he did a fine job. :eek:

Deino, you missed my point completely.

I was referring to David Axe, who has an English Literature degree.

Your friend's English is just fine, and his article is very well written.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: What will the 1st PLAN Carrier Air Wing look like?

Deino, you missed my point completely.

I was referring to David Axe, who has an English Literature degree.

Your friend's English is just fine, and his article is very well written.

Then I need to apologise ... I really misunderstaood You.

Sorry,
Deino
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: What will the 1st PLAN Carrier Air Wing look like?

I suppose the article is one of the better ones posted on war is boring in the sense that it doesn't make any major mistakes.

However there is a little part where the author says "Intriguingly, China appears to be planning to use its carriers to hunt submarines, a capability most other navies have abandoned, owing to its complexity and the perceived reduction in the undersea threat."

I have no idea where he extrapolated that from. The presence of the Z-18FQ doesn't mean liaoning is only going to carry ASW choppers, hell we don't even conclusively know if Z-18FQ will be necessarily stationed on liaoning. But if it is, it would hardly be strange, because all flattops have an ASW airwing component anyway.
So no, the liaoning isn't planning on using liaoning to "hunt submarines," because there is no evidence for that. More likely, they will carry a small ASW centred airwing onboard for anti submarine missions when they arise, but it will be a small fraction of the overall airwing.


Also, there's the payload of J-15 which he kind of glosses over, but I can accept that it may be a little much for some writers to consider that fighters can actually take off from ski jumps with heavy payloads.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: What will the 1st PLAN Carrier Air Wing look like?

However there is a little part where the author says "Intriguingly, China appears to be planning to use its carriers to hunt submarines, a capability most other navies have abandoned, owing to its complexity and the perceived reduction in the undersea threat."

... the liaoning isn't planning on using liaoning to "hunt submarines," because there is no evidence for that. More likely, they will carry a small ASW centred airwing onboard for anti submarine missions when they arise, but it will be a small fraction of the overall airwing.
Exactly Bltizo.

Usually, the ASW groups on the carriers (outside of the longer ranged S-3s the US carriers used to carry) are used for close-in...inner ring...ASW duties to protect the carrier and its immediate goal keeper escort. While the other DDGs and FFGs and their helos cover the other threat axis approaches further out.

In addition, you will have an SSN ranging around the carrier for ASW duties.

The JMSDF Hyuga carriers are better examples of what he is talking about...having a carrier tasked as the centerpieces of a hunter killer ASW group/task force.

The Liaoling is clearly going to be a traditional CV, whose ASW aircraft help protect it while it conducts its principle mission...that of conducting strike at sea and air support operations with its strike aircraft..
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views


PLAN-CSG-04.jpg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

chuck731

Banned Idiot
Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Those planes couldn't have flown off the Liaoning.

I haven't seen evidence of flight operation while Liaoning is in company of the task force (in other words actual operational training as oppose to conversion training). I imagine that will take another 1-2 years.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Those planes couldn't have flown off the Liaoning.

I haven't seen evidence of flight operation while Liaoning is in company of the task force (in other words actual operational training as oppose to conversion training). I imagine that will take another 1-2 years.

I don't think Jeff was implying they were but rather hoping that when he sees some photo op in the future again it will be. Besides in that picture it's quite evident those are not Flanker airframes but clearly JH-7s in formation
 

Lezt

Junior Member
Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Those planes couldn't have flown off the Liaoning.

I haven't seen evidence of flight operation while Liaoning is in company of the task force (in other words actual operational training as oppose to conversion training). I imagine that will take another 1-2 years.


Jeff did say that they are JH-7 which are land based in his comments... check the link. I think he meant the photo show aircraft overflight off the carrier. not that they took off from it.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Those planes couldn't have flown off the Liaoning.

I haven't seen evidence of flight operation while Liaoning is in company of the task force (in other words actual operational training as oppose to conversion training). I imagine that will take another 1-2 years.
The whole point of the photo and the discussion was precisely that those aircraft, JH-7s, did not fly off of the Liaoning.

You are taking the single picture out of context and also not placing it in reference to the discussion it was posted as a part of.

I was speaking to AFB, who indicated that when the Liaoning goes out this time, with what we hope are 4-6 J-15s, he hopes that they will do a formation flight of the Liaoning aircraft.

I then responded that and said, "this time" (meaning the new exercise), that they would need to actually fly off of the carrier, as opposed to "last time," when they had a fly over of land based aircraft as a part of the photo op and exercise.

I showed that picure of the last time the Liaoning was out to show that during those exercises a flight of land based JH-7s is what flew over.

But this is all something that could have been deduced by simply reading a few of the posts, rather than jumping to a conclusion that was never meant. Anyhow, apparently other posters got that point. Sorry if I was not clear.

So...of course those aircraft pictured in my post couldn't have flown off the Liaoning. They are land based JH-7 aircraft, which was my point.

I don't think Jeff was implying they were but rather hoping that when he sees some photo op in the future again it will be. Besides in that picture it's quite evident those are not Flanker airframes but clearly JH-7s in formation

Precisely.

...and at the link I provided, I did say this about that particular picture:

Jeff Head Link said:
Several JH-7A land-based Strike aircraft fly over the carrier and DDG escort

Anyhow, I felt I had made it clear what I meant. Sorry if there was any confusion.
 
Top