The American/NATO army is really plagued by similar issues brought to it by the people they inherited from the Reich.Let me say a few more words.I think this video is not as valuable as the comic I shared.
The content of the military part is only for the first five minutes, and then for the next two-thirds of the time, you must endure the nonsense of this second-rate military science popularization program.Wearing a tactical vest and holding a rifle won't make him look very professional.
The host of the program is just propagandizing a kind of political correctness,what he said was just an excerpt of some cliches.
I don't expect such a network anchor who will produce a new program in a few days to spend a lot of time studying knowledges.
Many western researchers are still examining China roughly based on the experience of the Soviet Union.What's more, they decided that "the American army is the best" from the beginning.
I'm disappointed that even the program "the armchair historian", which I like very much, gives a very bad description of the Chinese revolution,no one is willing to seriously read China's official propaganda materials (even if it is deemed "untrustworthy", it is impossible to completely deviate from history).Considering that Americans once claimed that Americans liberated Auschwitz concentration camp, I can't imagine how much Chinese history will be "modified" by Western propaganda machines.
I don't understand why they are so contemptuous of "political education",at least Americans are not qualified to despise the discipline level of PLA.
In that era when soldiers could rob and escape at will, strict political education was necessary. At that time, Chinese officers were all wealthy property owners. They regarded poor workers as Dalits and soldiers as servants. Looting, massacre, corporal punishment and salary deduction were common.In this environment, the relationship between soldiers and officers is very tense, and no one is willing to devote their lives.Moreover, the military officers, including Chiang Kai Shek, used force many times to destroy the civilian government, making the army the most politically ambitious organization.
Political education is the most important measure for China to establish a modern army. This method has curbed the uncontrolled violent tendency of the army, improved the relationship between officers and soldiers, and shattered the crisis of military coup. In the most difficult period, this also ensured that the army did not waver out of control.
The most important thing is that the discipline of the army has been strengthened, and it has won the maximum trust and support of the people.And American soldiers show the arrogance of conquerors in any country.
Many people, including Taiwanese, have been repeating the lie that "PLA's command is very rigid".Mao Zedong is not Stalin,for a long time, the PLA was limited by poor communication capability, high casualty rate of officers and the power contrast between strong and weak, which placed great emphasis on the "initiative" of officers and soldiers, similar to the "Mission Command" of the German army.
Those claims that PLA was deeply influenced by the Soviet Union are nonsense. Those who say such words have never studied the development history of PLA at all.
In fact, cleaning up military corruption can be regarded as the final cleanup of the consequences of the reduction of military spending in the 1980s.I don't deny that this has a political purpose, but it's not a bad thing, and there is no mass execution of officers like the Soviets.As for other allegations, I just want to ask Americans why the STEED military cart is worth $100000 each.
View attachment 92126
(this kind of electric cart is very common in China,the PLA is also using)
The U.S. military occupation and equipment research and development are the hardest hit areas of corruption, but it seems that it is no longer corrupt to make all this public.
In the middle of writing, I think all this is meaningless, because the Internet is full of baseless speculation about PLA.But I can't bear to delete so much content.So I had to finish it.
This video has nothing to do with our topic other than the title, all it does is blather on about the PLA. the Normandy landings are almost 80 years old and outdated, just like using Napoleonic tactics in WWI.
They don't tolerate failure and therefore planning for failure is taboo.
They're too propagandized, thinking that they're inherently smarter, more capable of taking initiative, etc than a bunch of slavs/asians. Unlike the nazis, they won't admit it openly, but this type of thinking has wormed its way into the military because of the government's political control. Ironically, it makes themselves rigid, to the point where their armored formations could get encircled by infantry in wars like Korea.
Because of this, once things start going poorly, low level commands start covering up failures by vastly exaggerating gains and enemy losses, deceiving high level commands about the true situation on the ground.
Finally, but perhaps most damming, the government's denial of corruption, propaganda painting corruption as a phenomenon that cannot happen within the superior American spirit, they have surrendered unconditionally in the war on corruption. How can you battle something which you refuse to see?
These factors are why I believe the American threat is really much smaller than it looks like.
Remember how Americans despite what the official govt says about their patriotism, they didn't even want to be drafted to fight Vietnam, in a war that's way way less dangerous.
China merely needs a push that decisively shows superiority over the US forces, and US won't have a plan to deal with it aside from coping and blustering. Something like, sinking 2-3 aircraft carriers, shooting down most of the US GPS network and putting long range missiles on Taiwan East coast. When US soldiers realize they're not going on a safari to kill dirty communists from safety, that they're in fact the ones being shot at like fish in a barrel while their command requires them to rush into PLA kill zones, they'll crumble en masse. In fact, highly likely that once USA catches wind that the above is going to happen, they will preemptively save face by withdrawing from Asia before China even fires a single shot.
Of course, betting on a morale break would be negligence on the part of the PLA, so the buildup should still assume that USA will one day attack using full force, that USA military command is as competent as the PLA, that US soldiers are equally professional etc. But just given the absolute joke of corruption within the States, the constant issues they have with overly optimistic reports, it paints a very unflattering picture of how well they will do in modern war.