PLA Navy news, pics and videos

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just a nice CG model of the flat-deck research and testing platform ship based on current observation, made by Big Bun CG on Weibo.

The U(C)AVs exhibited on the flight deck should be strictly taken as purely envisaged by the maker of this CG model only.

View attachment 140133

Another view, made by the same guy on Weibo.

008k1Segly1hw1qsijjbsj33341qi7wh.jpg
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Here's that test platform at dockside.

54110146736_aaf0aa2b7b_o.jpg

According to several bidding documents for various subsystems, assuming they are indeed for this particular test platform, the ship is called "未来型海洋智能空海潜一体无人系统母船", or "future intelligent air-sea-subsea integrated unmanned system mother ship". It seems to imply that not only is this a mothership for aerial drones, but it's also for unmanned surface and underwater vehicles.

54169848969_0643f681b2_o.jpg
54168669547_624b5b842d_b.jpg

54169545981_42baa529e6_o.jpg
54168669587_e79555ac26_o.jpg
54168669547_73ea1f94b5_o.jpg
 

snake65

Junior Member
VIP Professional
According to several bidding documents for various subsystems, assuming they are indeed for this particular test platform, the ship is called "未来型海洋智能空海潜一体无人系统母船", or "future intelligent air-sea-subsea integrated unmanned system mother ship". It seems to imply that not only is this a mothership for aerial drones, but it's also for unmanned surface and underwater vehicles

If this is the case, there should be a well deck in the aft.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Apparently the spaces for both the hangar deck and deck elevator in the fore half of the platform ship (plus possibly well deck in the aft half) have been reserved (空间预留) onboard the platform ship, i.e. the features can be added on during future retrofit/modification works, should the need arises.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Very likely to be a flatdeck testbed platform ship seen in a tender announcement document from September 2022. Pretty good chances that fixed-wing UAVs will be operated from this ship.

Matching details include:
- Overall (flight deck) length of 200 meters;
- Beam/flight deck width of nearly 40 meters; and
- Twin island superstructures.

View attachment 137926

The only things still unverified as of present are the presence of a well deck to the aft and a hangar deck to the fore of the ship.

More recently, the flatdeck is getting coated. Seen from a satellite photo of the same location earlier this month:

View attachment 137930
No elevator ??? Didn't see outline of one on any pictures even for cargo. Searching better picture of the top but nothing visible on any of them.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Discussion continued in this thread to avoid derailing the original thread.
Drone carrier

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
View attachment 140184
^^^Steel cutting for this ship begin in April, and the ship was launched in November.

Basically China's version of the escort carrier.

That flat-deck research and testing platform ship is built with largely civilian standards, with the ship under the CSSC instead of the PLAN. The location of the smokestack that close to the stern of the ship (i.e. 3rd island superstructure) is an evidence of this.

If the PLAN desires an actual escort carrier that is capable of fighting naval wars on the high seas, they'd need something that is larger, displaces more and built with greater degree of military standards than this ship.
 
Last edited:

pkj

Junior Member
Registered Member
Discussion continued in this thread to avoid derailing the original thread.



That flat-deck research and testing platform ship is built with largely civilian standards, with the ship under the CSSC instead of the PLAN. The location of the smokestack that close to the stern of the ship (i.e. 3rd island superstructure) is an evidence of this.

If the PLAN desires an actual escort carrier that is capable of fighting naval wars on the high seas, they'd need something that is larger, displaces more and built with greater degree of military standards than this ship.

Is (or could) the need for better visual navigation (especially during docking), be the reason for the the clipped starboard bow, near the navigation island?
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Discussion continued in this thread to avoid derailing the original thread.



That flat-deck research and testing platform ship is built with largely civilian standards, with the ship under the CSSC instead of the PLAN. The location of the smokestack that close to the stern of the ship (i.e. 3rd island superstructure) is an evidence of this.

If the PLAN desires an actual escort carrier that is capable of fighting naval wars on the high seas, they'd need something that is larger, displaces more and built with greater degree of military standards than this ship.

What's the displacement?
 
Top