I have no idea. Perhaps within another year or so there might be more info out there to attempt to answer that question.But seeing as you raised the question, what do you think explains this "lull" in production?
I have no idea. Perhaps within another year or so there might be more info out there to attempt to answer that question.But seeing as you raised the question, what do you think explains this "lull" in production?
"14.5 construction has started. see you all next year."Is there an English language translation of the information contained within that image?
I have no idea. Perhaps within another year or so there might be more info out there to attempt to answer that question.
Sorry for being daft but what does 14.5 refer to? Is that a date? Or something else?"14.5 construction has started. see you all next year."
I think it's reasonable. It's certainly one of the possible explanations. The overall length of the construction lull will, hopefully, show how plausible that explanation is.Do you think the explanation I described in 4674 is not unreasonable?
Does that mean 14th Five-Year Plan?"14.5 construction has started. see you all next year."
Yes.Does that mean 14th Five-Year Plan?
My belief is that rumours give us the basis to speculate, and then we correlate what we see with rumours.
In terms of the "lull" in new ships launched in these couple of years, I am not sure if there is necessarily any significant more explanation other than "previously ordered ships have had contracts fulfilled, and few new ships were immediately ordered".
If there had to be an overall overarching way of explaining this trend, I would argue that the assessment of the strategic environment and/or emergence of new systems and technologies meant they would have taken a bit of time to calibrate what they wanted to buy in numbers (rather than just plowing ahead).
But seeing as you raised the question, what do you think explains this "lull" in production?
"Some sort of concern" I think isn't the right way of describing it, because virtually all platforms at any stage of their life cycle has "some kind of concern".
A newly developed platform is either too new/unproven in terms of subsystems/hull.... whereas a more mature platform is either lacking in growth capacity or using older technologies/subsystems.
In terms of the PLAN's current ongoing procurement, I think it is too easy to lose the forest for the trees.
That is to say, it is very easy to look at the 054A restarts, prospective 052D production, and newer ships like 055s, and think about the various "compromises" or "immaturities" that they have against a specific sort of weapons system that might be more well adapted to them.