This first one should be a 052B as that's the only PLAN ship with an arm launcher, for the SA-N-12.
PLA Navy news, pics and videos
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
This first one should be a 052B as that's the only PLAN ship with an arm launcher, for the SA-N-12.
Hyperwarp
Captain
I am not an expert either, but here are my guesses:
1: 9K37M1-2 (SA-N-12) fired from 052B
2: YJ-82 fired from 054A?
3: HHQ-16 fired from 054A
JayBird
Junior Member
Chinese Submarine Stalked U.S. Aircraft Carrier
Attack submarine sailed near USS Reagan south of Japan
BY: Bill Gertz
November 3, 2015 5:00 am
A Chinese attack submarine stalked the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan near Japan last month in the closest encounter between a carrier and a People’s Liberation Army Navy submarine since 2006, according to American defense officials.
The Chinese submarine sailed very close to the Reagan during the weekend of Oct. 24, said defense officials familiar with reports of the incident.
The incident occurred as the Reagan sailed from its home port to the Sea of Japan around the southern end of Japan.
Days later, in the Sea of Japan, the Reagan was targeted for a close flyby by two Russian Tu-142 bombers that flew within a mile of the ship at an altitude of 500 feet. U.S. Navy jets were scrambled to escort the bombers away from the carrier group.
The submarine encounter also occurred days before the USS Lassen, a guided missile destroyer, carried out a freedom of navigation operation in the South China Sea.
The Lassen’s passage within 12 miles of a disputed island in the South China Sea on Oct. 26 was fiercely denounced by the Chinese government. Chinese spokesmen, both military and civilian, said the passage was a violation of Beijing’s territorial sovereignty, a claim rejected by the United States, which said the ship was sailing in international waters.
Disclosure of the Chinese submarine encounter comes as Adm. Harry Harris is visiting China for the first time as the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific.
Pacific Fleet and Pacific Command spokesmen declined to comment on the submarine encounter but did not deny that the incident occurred.
Additional details of the encounter—such as the type of submarine involved, whether it surfaced or remained submerged, and how close it came to the ship—could not be learned.
The nuclear-powered carrier is a symbol of U.S. power projection capabilities. China’s military has been attempting to drive the U.S. military out of Asia as part of efforts to assume the sole leadership role in the region.
One defense official said the detection of the submarine set off alarm bells on the Reagan, although it could not be learned whether anti-submarine warfare aircraft were launched to locate and track the vessel.
Other defense officials said the Reagan’s recent submarine encounter appeared similar to China’s stalking of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in 2006.
During that incident, a Song-class attack submarine surfaced undetected within torpedo range of the Kitty Hawk on Oct. 26, 2006—nearly nine years to the day of the recent Reagan encounter.
The 2006 incident also was disclosed during the visit to China by Adm. Gary Roughead, then-commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
China is known to use its military forces to send political messages and it appears that the Reagan incident also was timed to the expected navigation operation in the South China Sea and to Harris’ visit.
Harris has been a forceful advocate within the military for challenging China’s claims to vast areas of the South China Sea. He told a Senate hearing in September that “the South China Sea is no more China’s than the Gulf of Mexico is Mexico’s.”
Harris visited U.S. troops in South Korea over the weekend and took part in the annual U.S.-South Korea Military Committee Meeting and Security Consultative Meeting in Seoul.
On Monday, Harris traveled to Beijing for a three-day visit and talks with Chinese military leaders. He was scheduled to speak at Peking University on Monday.
“Sustained military-to-military dialogue between the U.S. and China is designed to maximize cooperation on areas of mutual interest while candidly addressing and managing disagreements,” the Pacific Command statement said.
Harris’ last visit to China took place in April 2014 when he took part in talks with the Chinese military on a Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea in Qingdao, China. The code, which covers submarine-ship encounters, was approved in 2014.
It is not known whether the Chinese submarine followed safety guidelines outlined in the code during the Reagan encounter. The code is designed to prevent collisions at sea.
The Reagan and four other warships were on the way to conduct joint naval exercises with South Korean naval forces at the time of the Chinese submarine stalking.
The exercises were held Oct. 26 to Oct. 29 in waters around the southern end of the Korean peninsula. The carrier arrived Friday in Busan, South Korea, for a port call.
Accompanying the Reagan are the Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser USS Chancellorsville and the Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers USS Fitzgerald and USS Mustin.
A Pacific Command statement issued Saturday said the Reagan is one of two carrier groups operating in the region. The second is the USS Roosevelt, which departed Singapore Oct. 28 on its way to San Diego.
The Reagan was “operating off the east coast of the Korean peninsula conducting routine bilateral training with the Republic of Korea navy,” the command statement said, adding that anti-submarine warfare training was part of the exercises.
“The U.S. routinely conducts carrier strike group operations in the waters around the Republic of Korea to exercise maritime maneuvers, strengthen the U.S.-ROK alliance, and improve regional security,” the statement said.
“The U.S. Navy maintains a presence in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region to help preserve peace and security and further our partnerships with friends and allies,” said Rear Adm. John Alexander, the Reagan’s commander. “Our forward presence contributes to freedom of navigation and lawful use of the sea, as well as furthers operational training and enables an exchange of culture, skills, and tactical knowledge.”
Rick Fisher, a Chinese military affairs analyst, said China’s willingness to use submarines to harass U.S. large warship demonstrates that the Navy needs more submarines for escort missions.
It also highlights the need for additional U.S. attack submarines as Los Angeles-class submarines are retired and are not replaced quickly enough by newer Virginia-class vessels.
“The importance of our aircraft carriers was just demonstrated in the South China Sea,” said Fisher, with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.
“While most press attention focused on the freedom of navigation exercise of the destroyer USS Lassen, the larger story was the fact that the destroyer was covered by the presence of the aircraft carrier USS Roosevelt,” he added. “The carrier was deployed to ensure that China was deterred from attacking or substantially harassing the destroyer.”
Fisher said that he expects China’s attack submarine fleet to begin increasing in size.
“The PLA may build up to 14 of their third-generation Type 095 SSN, which might add up to a total SSN fleet of about 20,” he said, using the military designation for attack submarine.
“Inasmuch as the U.S. may only be able to spare about 30 SSNs for its Pacific-based forces, this could greatly stress the U.S. submarine fleet absent new construction,” he added.
A fleet of 30 attack submarines may limit continuous deployment of submarines to around 10, given the need for maintenance and for crew rotations.
Chinese state-run media and military commentators have denounced the deployment of the Reagan, which replaced the carrier group led by the USS George Washington.
“The United States intends to strengthen its military superiority in order to frighten the neighboring countries of the disputed region, such as China, [North Korea], and Russia,” retired Chinese Rear Adm. Yin Zhuo told state television in September.
Attack submarine sailed near USS Reagan south of Japan
BY: Bill Gertz
November 3, 2015 5:00 am
A Chinese attack submarine stalked the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan near Japan last month in the closest encounter between a carrier and a People’s Liberation Army Navy submarine since 2006, according to American defense officials.
The Chinese submarine sailed very close to the Reagan during the weekend of Oct. 24, said defense officials familiar with reports of the incident.
The incident occurred as the Reagan sailed from its home port to the Sea of Japan around the southern end of Japan.
Days later, in the Sea of Japan, the Reagan was targeted for a close flyby by two Russian Tu-142 bombers that flew within a mile of the ship at an altitude of 500 feet. U.S. Navy jets were scrambled to escort the bombers away from the carrier group.
The submarine encounter also occurred days before the USS Lassen, a guided missile destroyer, carried out a freedom of navigation operation in the South China Sea.
The Lassen’s passage within 12 miles of a disputed island in the South China Sea on Oct. 26 was fiercely denounced by the Chinese government. Chinese spokesmen, both military and civilian, said the passage was a violation of Beijing’s territorial sovereignty, a claim rejected by the United States, which said the ship was sailing in international waters.
Disclosure of the Chinese submarine encounter comes as Adm. Harry Harris is visiting China for the first time as the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific.
Pacific Fleet and Pacific Command spokesmen declined to comment on the submarine encounter but did not deny that the incident occurred.
Additional details of the encounter—such as the type of submarine involved, whether it surfaced or remained submerged, and how close it came to the ship—could not be learned.
The nuclear-powered carrier is a symbol of U.S. power projection capabilities. China’s military has been attempting to drive the U.S. military out of Asia as part of efforts to assume the sole leadership role in the region.
One defense official said the detection of the submarine set off alarm bells on the Reagan, although it could not be learned whether anti-submarine warfare aircraft were launched to locate and track the vessel.
Other defense officials said the Reagan’s recent submarine encounter appeared similar to China’s stalking of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in 2006.
During that incident, a Song-class attack submarine surfaced undetected within torpedo range of the Kitty Hawk on Oct. 26, 2006—nearly nine years to the day of the recent Reagan encounter.
The 2006 incident also was disclosed during the visit to China by Adm. Gary Roughead, then-commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
China is known to use its military forces to send political messages and it appears that the Reagan incident also was timed to the expected navigation operation in the South China Sea and to Harris’ visit.
Harris has been a forceful advocate within the military for challenging China’s claims to vast areas of the South China Sea. He told a Senate hearing in September that “the South China Sea is no more China’s than the Gulf of Mexico is Mexico’s.”
Harris visited U.S. troops in South Korea over the weekend and took part in the annual U.S.-South Korea Military Committee Meeting and Security Consultative Meeting in Seoul.
On Monday, Harris traveled to Beijing for a three-day visit and talks with Chinese military leaders. He was scheduled to speak at Peking University on Monday.
“Sustained military-to-military dialogue between the U.S. and China is designed to maximize cooperation on areas of mutual interest while candidly addressing and managing disagreements,” the Pacific Command statement said.
Harris’ last visit to China took place in April 2014 when he took part in talks with the Chinese military on a Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea in Qingdao, China. The code, which covers submarine-ship encounters, was approved in 2014.
It is not known whether the Chinese submarine followed safety guidelines outlined in the code during the Reagan encounter. The code is designed to prevent collisions at sea.
The Reagan and four other warships were on the way to conduct joint naval exercises with South Korean naval forces at the time of the Chinese submarine stalking.
The exercises were held Oct. 26 to Oct. 29 in waters around the southern end of the Korean peninsula. The carrier arrived Friday in Busan, South Korea, for a port call.
Accompanying the Reagan are the Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser USS Chancellorsville and the Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers USS Fitzgerald and USS Mustin.
A Pacific Command statement issued Saturday said the Reagan is one of two carrier groups operating in the region. The second is the USS Roosevelt, which departed Singapore Oct. 28 on its way to San Diego.
The Reagan was “operating off the east coast of the Korean peninsula conducting routine bilateral training with the Republic of Korea navy,” the command statement said, adding that anti-submarine warfare training was part of the exercises.
“The U.S. routinely conducts carrier strike group operations in the waters around the Republic of Korea to exercise maritime maneuvers, strengthen the U.S.-ROK alliance, and improve regional security,” the statement said.
“The U.S. Navy maintains a presence in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region to help preserve peace and security and further our partnerships with friends and allies,” said Rear Adm. John Alexander, the Reagan’s commander. “Our forward presence contributes to freedom of navigation and lawful use of the sea, as well as furthers operational training and enables an exchange of culture, skills, and tactical knowledge.”
Rick Fisher, a Chinese military affairs analyst, said China’s willingness to use submarines to harass U.S. large warship demonstrates that the Navy needs more submarines for escort missions.
It also highlights the need for additional U.S. attack submarines as Los Angeles-class submarines are retired and are not replaced quickly enough by newer Virginia-class vessels.
“The importance of our aircraft carriers was just demonstrated in the South China Sea,” said Fisher, with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.
“While most press attention focused on the freedom of navigation exercise of the destroyer USS Lassen, the larger story was the fact that the destroyer was covered by the presence of the aircraft carrier USS Roosevelt,” he added. “The carrier was deployed to ensure that China was deterred from attacking or substantially harassing the destroyer.”
Fisher said that he expects China’s attack submarine fleet to begin increasing in size.
“The PLA may build up to 14 of their third-generation Type 095 SSN, which might add up to a total SSN fleet of about 20,” he said, using the military designation for attack submarine.
“Inasmuch as the U.S. may only be able to spare about 30 SSNs for its Pacific-based forces, this could greatly stress the U.S. submarine fleet absent new construction,” he added.
A fleet of 30 attack submarines may limit continuous deployment of submarines to around 10, given the need for maintenance and for crew rotations.
Chinese state-run media and military commentators have denounced the deployment of the Reagan, which replaced the carrier group led by the USS George Washington.
“The United States intends to strengthen its military superiority in order to frighten the neighboring countries of the disputed region, such as China, [North Korea], and Russia,” retired Chinese Rear Adm. Yin Zhuo told state television in September.
GreenestGDP
Junior Member
My 2 cents observation ... ...
IMHO ... ...
1): It seems PLAN subs are not as noisy as opfor pundits alleged.
Firstly, if PLAN is using 093-G to shadow the opfor carrier, then ...
it means PLAN are not worry the opfor carrier can record 093-G noise patterns.
2): Consequently, it means the 095 subs have been deployed,
and 095 subs are ready to patrol and prowl the ocean.
3
Consequently, it means PLAN is working on producing 097 sub at this moment.
------------------------------------------------
Soon, after Adm. Harris departs Beijing,
then we will have FON #2, with Japanese warship joining the FON party.
It will be intriguing to hear and read the next PLAN counter reactions.
IMHO ... ...
1): It seems PLAN subs are not as noisy as opfor pundits alleged.
Firstly, if PLAN is using 093-G to shadow the opfor carrier, then ...
it means PLAN are not worry the opfor carrier can record 093-G noise patterns.
2): Consequently, it means the 095 subs have been deployed,
and 095 subs are ready to patrol and prowl the ocean.
3
Consequently, it means PLAN is working on producing 097 sub at this moment. ------------------------------------------------
Soon, after Adm. Harris departs Beijing,
then we will have FON #2, with Japanese warship joining the FON party.
It will be intriguing to hear and read the next PLAN counter reactions.
My 2 cents observation ... ...
IMHO ... ...
1): It seems PLAN subs are not as noisy as opfor pundits alleged.
Firstly, if PLAN is using 093-G to shadow the opfor carrier, then ...
it means PLAN are not worry the opfor carrier can record 093-G noise patterns.
2): Consequently, it means the 095 subs have been deployed,
and 095 subs are ready to patrol and prowl the ocean.
3
------------------------------------------------
Soon, after Adm. Harris departs Beijing,
then we will have FON #2, with Japanese warship joining the FON party.
It will be intriguing to hear and read the next PLAN counter reactions.
1: we have no evidence to suggest that the 093B/Gs are even in commission. We know three have been built and have been launched, but we don't know their in service status. For all we know, it could have been (and likely was) either an 093 or an 091(G) which tailed the Reagan.
2: we have no evidence that any 095s have even began construction, nor any significant rumours to that notion. We know 095 will succeed the 093 family, but we don't know what they will look like as of yet.
3: no 095 means 097 is not even worth thinking about
So to sum up, the present Chinese SSN situation is like so:
In service: a few late 091s, two 093s
Launched/fitting out/or sea trials: three 093B/Gs
Expected/likely soon to be in construction: 095s
it's amazing some of the nonsense that comes out. Every China attack subs get followed around as soon as they leave their port. The fact that they know that a Chinese sub was trailing the carrier should make that pretty obvious.
kwaigonegin
Colonel
I can say with a high degree of certainty that is correct. Any SSN/SSK that is launch will be tailed almost immediately and acoustic signatures recorded and catalogued.
GreenestGDP
Junior Member
Chinese submarine tracked
U.S. aircraft carrier off Japan
Source:
PLAN Kilo picture.
Source: Planeman
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/bluffers-guide-chinese-naval-power.t4865/
It seems the Reagan group was not accompanied by any US submarine,
or even worst, ... the unthinkable ... ...
the US submarines failed to detect PLAN Kilo until it became too close.
If all PLAN submarines are that noisy and they are so easy to
tracked and cataloged, then ... ... why ... ?
the US Defense official broadcast the news, using the carefully
selected words < STALKED >, and so far there is no correction or
denial from the US Navy ??
The US Navy could easily denies and say we have been tracking and
cataloging a PLAN Kilo submarine, and stalking the Kilo for 72 hours
from point A in China, all the way back to point B in China.
And, release the video of the whole tracking events ... ...
With all due respect, ... ...
Just curious ... ...
1) What is the useful and logical purpose of the leaked news
by the US Defense official ?
2) Where are the Los Angeles, Virginia, or Seawolf who are
supposed to protect the Reagan group ?
U.S. aircraft carrier off Japan
Source:
PLAN Kilo picture.
Source: Planeman
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/bluffers-guide-chinese-naval-power.t4865/
It seems the Reagan group was not accompanied by any US submarine,
or even worst, ... the unthinkable ... ...
the US submarines failed to detect PLAN Kilo until it became too close.
If all PLAN submarines are that noisy and they are so easy to
tracked and cataloged, then ... ... why ... ?
the US Defense official broadcast the news, using the carefully
selected words < STALKED >, and so far there is no correction or
denial from the US Navy ??
The US Navy could easily denies and say we have been tracking and
cataloging a PLAN Kilo submarine, and stalking the Kilo for 72 hours
from point A in China, all the way back to point B in China.
And, release the video of the whole tracking events ... ...
With all due respect, ... ...
Just curious ... ...
1) What is the useful and logical purpose of the leaked news
by the US Defense official ?
2) Where are the Los Angeles, Virginia, or Seawolf who are
supposed to protect the Reagan group ?
You are reading far too much into this.
The US simply said a Chinese submarine closely tracked them.
This is not terribly out of the ordinary.
Submarines usually try and shadow major groupings of others vessels...and they generally do it "silently."
IOW, they do not want the other Navy to know they were there.
The US Navy does this all of the time. The Russians, Brits, French, etc. do it.
Reading into such an announcement that there was any significant failure by the US Navy, or that somehow the Ronald Reagan was left unprotected in any way is simply completely unwarranted.
The US announcing it is probably as much about letting the Chinese know that the US knew, without revelaing how they knew, or how soon they knew, or what method the US used to know, than anything else.
The ASW cat and mouse contest is as much a contest of information as it is other things.
Last edited: