He is probably comparing it with the likes of Tor which only has missiles with range to 12km.What did you mean of "crazy" ? way above/below your expectation ? what range is your expectation for HQ-17AE ?
He is probably comparing it with the likes of Tor which only has missiles with range to 12km.What did you mean of "crazy" ? way above/below your expectation ? what range is your expectation for HQ-17AE ?
Later versions of Tor-M2 have 16 km range. The replacement for Tor the Morphey is expected to further increase range.He is probably comparing it with the likes of Tor which only has missiles with range to 12km.
I remember that, but slant range is whats given on the billboard and it makes no sense to use slant range on the sort of drone munition from the video - and in that case, 30km seems a bit low for a winged drone. Also I've frankly had doubts about that munition for a while, it doesn't seem to make much sense to launch from the HQ-17 platform.I remember there was once advertised a special drone like munition, to be fired from existing missile cells in HQ17. said drone-like munition was advertised to work against other drones, and its graphics featured large wings, it definitely looked subsonic.
Said munition could very well have range of 30 km - against certain target types like slow drones.
Hm, does fd1000 have anything in common with the small form hq9 missile? If not, would it mean yet another separate missile for PLA, assuming a HQ variant of it exists?
Could it possibly be related to the so called HQ-Train station.It probably is the HQ-9B missile.